pages_fts: 116
This data as json
rowid | text |
---|---|
116 | The Economic Development and Community Services Manager stated the funding could span over a couple of years; flexible funds would extend over a longer period of time. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the proposed time period. The Economic Development and Community Services Manager responded the current funding will likely last one to one and a half years; stated if Council extends the funding, the program will last approximately two years. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she is unsure whether Alameda Family Services (AFS) providing mental health services has been reviewed; noted AFS offers substantial counseling; inquired whether AFS would be eligible to help with the mental health services recommendation. The Economic Development and Community Services Manager responded staff can create a Request for Proposals (RFP); stated the City does not have to work with the proposed entity; AFS is interested in providing services, but not of the type proposed. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated AFS has the capability to perform 24/7 service; inquired whether the allocation of funds is the best use; stated that she is unsure since she does not know the basis of the formula used; expressed support for flexible funds; inquired whether the City can reallocate any funds received based on costs and needs. The Economic Development and Community Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the proposed cost for services would be $1,250 per week based on a full weekly schedule, including weekends. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the length of the term, to which the Economic Development and Community Services Manager responded the term would span one year. Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for some flexibility and for keeping people in their homes. Vice Mayor Vella stated the unhoused population has grown; there is a significant need for members of the day shelter; many people do not have a place to go at night; the recommendation is a good opportunity; the proposal will likely be substantially insufficient to serve the need; expressed support for the staff recommendation; stated the matter is maximizing the space at the day center, while still addressing needs with dignity; she is prepared to support the proposal; she would like to remain cognizant of staff time; staff is working on a number of different issues; she does not support having staff go back and perform work multiple times; existing providers are currently operating in the space; Council needs to honor the work being done; an RFP would further delay the process of providing needed services. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 20, 2021 13 |