pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2021-10-25 and page = 2
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PensionBoard/2021-10-25.pdf,2 | PensionBoard | 2021-10-25 | 2 | City of Alameda Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Pension Board - Monday, July 26, 2021 Page 2 Trustee Soderlund moved to accept the financial statements as presented and Secretary Bronstein seconded. Passed by roll call vote, 3-0. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT): There were no oral communications from the public. 6. PENSION BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARD): Trustee Soderlund asked for an update on finding a police representative for the board. Secretary Bronstein stated Human Resources had identified current police employees qualified to serve on the pension board, one being the Chief of Police. That reach out is going on. Chair Aschaft said surely we will have one committed for the next meeting. 7. ADJOURNMENT: There being no additional items to come before the board, the meeting was adjourned at 4:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, me Nancy Bronstein Human Resources Director | PensionBoard/2021-10-25.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2021-10-25.pdf,2 | PlanningBoard | 2021-10-25 | 2 | Director Thomas discussed the number of revisions they had received and how they had integrated those changes. He said most of the concerns and changes had revolved around housing. He discussed some of the biggest changes and the issues that were being addressed. Board Member Rona Rothenberg thanked the staff for all their hard work. She suggested that staff review the comments and suggestions from the Alameda Architecture Preservation Society (AAPS) and incorporate them if they were relevant. Board Member Xiomara Cisneros also thanked the staff as well for their hard work. She wanted to confirm that the "Housing Growth Opportunity Areas" in the General Plan wasn't final. Director Thomas explained how the Spotlights is the General Plan worked. In that Spotlight, they were trying to see where most of the growth in Alameda would be over 20 years. That map was not inclusive of all the sites they will need to consider for the Housing Element. Board Member Cisneros asked for clarification on where information and plans for bicycle boulevards had gone. Director Thomas discussed how the staff had thought about that term and how it should be defined once it was adopted. They had backed away from ME-7 and focused on Slow Streets. Board Member Alan Teague asked how changes they made would be presented to the City Council. He suggested how the changes could be presented to the council. Director Thomas answered that they would like to bring the board's recommendations to the council and have the council adopt the General Plan with those additional changes but he was open to Board Member Teague's suggestion. Vice President Ruiz asked for clarification between The General Plan and the Housing Element, for the board's and the public's benefit. These are two living documents and she wanted to assure the public that the General Plan could move forward while the Housing Element was still being considered. Director Thomas agreed and discussed the differences between The General Plan and the Housing Element and the unique work that … | PlanningBoard/2021-10-25.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );