pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2018-12-17 and page = 3
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission/2018-12-17.pdf,3 | OpenGovernmentCommission | 2018-12-17 | 3 | Commissioner Foreman stated his motion included dismissing the reconsideration of the matter. Chair Little inquired whether the motion should also include having the item re-noticed by City Council, to which Commissioner Foreman responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Foreman stated that he thinks staff report Attachment B would suffice with some changes. The Interim City Attorney stated Attachment B could be easily word-smithed to carry out what the Commission would like with respect to the matter; further stated that he is not going to agree with Commissioner Foreman's position that the ordinances in question are null and void; the decision will have the effect of providing direction to the Council to have said result come about; as indicated in his memo to the Commission, he does not think the Commission has the legal authority to render a legally adopted ordinance null and void. Chair Little stated the Commission was told that the timing of their deliberations and delaying the second reading of the ordinances in order for the Commission hearing to take place first did not matter; inquired whether the issue came about because the Commission deliberated on the issue after the second reading of the ordinances. The Interim City Attorney responded the matter proceeded on November 7th; at the October 16th meeting, the City Attorney advised the City Council that it was appropriate to introduce the ordinance with the amendment in question and that it did comply with the Sunshine Ordinance; Council relied on said advice and made the decision to proceed on November 7th notwithstanding the fact that a complaint had been filed on October 30th Council adopted the ordinances on November 7th which went into effect on December 6th. it is his understanding that the Commission would like to have the ordinances re-noticed, and the two ordinances would be repealed. Commissioner Dieter made a friendly amendment to the motion that the Commission affirm its November 7th decision. Commissioner Foreman stated that is basically his… | OpenGovernmentCommission/2018-12-17.pdf |
RentReviewAdvisoryCommittee/2018-12-17.pdf,3 | RentReviewAdvisoryCommittee | 2018-12-17 | 3 | Approved Minutes December 17, 2018 7-D. CASE 1179 - 1845 Poggi St., Apt. D223 Tenant: Tam Trung Nguyen Landlord: Andy King Proposed rent increase: $169.00 (10.0%), to a total rent of $1,864, effective December 1, 2018 Using a speaker phone Staff called a translation service to obtain a Vietnamese translator for Mr. Nguyen. Vice Chair Murray explained the meeting procedure to Mr. Nguyen. Mr. King stated that his company purchased the property over a year ago and have made $3 million in improvements, as the prior owners had neglected maintaining and improving the property. Mr. King detailed the improvements made to the property, which included seismic retrofitting, security improvements, and the addition of amenities. He said the property tax bill was approximately half a million dollars more than the previous owner. Mr. Nguyen said he had lived in the unit for two years, and is paying more than many current residents. He said that he could afford a 5% increase but not the 10% the landlord was requesting. He said that there have been improvements to the property but not the inside of his unit. Member Johnson asked Mr. King how many units were currently vacant and he provided an approximate number. She asked how much current units were renting for and Mr. King provided a range of current market rate rents. Mr. Nguyen said he was a baker for Sugar Bowl Bakery and his son attended a high school in the City of Alameda. He said his wife worked part-time in a local spa as a nail technician. Member Sullivan-Cheah asked Mr. Nguyen how much of a rent increase he could afford. Mr. Nguyen said he could afford a maximum increase of $80. He said an increase above that would make their budget very tight considering their other expenses. The parties were not able to make an agreement and the Committee began deliberations. Member Johnson said she thought an increase of about 5% was reasonable as the landlord acquired the property knowing the improvements that needed to be done and how much the current tenants' rents were. Member S… | RentReviewAdvisoryCommittee/2018-12-17.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );