pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2013-01-28 and page = 3
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2013-01-28.pdf,3 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2013-01-28 | 3 | Chair Lord-Hausman asked Commissioner Tam to work with Alameda Police Department regarding sensitivity training for the Capon Housing Project to which he agreed. The Chair stated the Universal Design Ordinance is moving forward along with Park Street Bench Project and working with Mastick Senior Center. Vice-Chair Harp stated there has been an increased interest in the CDI. 5-B. Universal Design Work Group Update (Vice Chair Harp) Vice-Chair Harp stated the work group met on January 14th and will have the final draft available in February. 5-C. Park Street Bench Project (Chair Lord-Hausman) Chair Lord-Hausman stated the project is moving along slowly. Chair Lord-Hausman will check with Public Works Director, Matt Naclerio on the progress. Chair Lord- Hausman asked Commissioner Warren to be the liaison with Public Works on the project. 5-D. City Council Meeting Report (Commissioner Fort) Commissioner Fort stated that there is nothing to report. 5-E. Planning Board Meeting Report (Chair Lord-Hausman) Chair Lord-Hausman stated there is a lot of development going on including Alameda Landing Boat Works. The development of the Universal Design Ordinance is paramount to the timing of their development projects. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS (Secretary Akil) Secretary Akil requested that the CDI decide the meeting schedule for 2013. The CDI agreed that the next meeting will be Monday, April 22, 2013 and will decide on future meetings at that time. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS 7-A. Commissioner Deutsch stated that the Market Place on Park Street installed automatic doors. 7-B. Chair Lord-Hausman stated there will be community meetings and there is an online survey regarding the Alameda Belt Line open space project. 7-C. Chair Lord-Hausman stated she and Commissioner Fort have attended the Risk Based Pilot Project held at Mastick in order to develop a Pilot Project Program to reach the vulnerable population in Alameda in the event of a disaster. 3 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2013-01-28.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2013-01-28.pdf,3 | PlanningBoard | 2013-01-28 | 3 | Chuck Kapelke, resident, stated the project should include an urban forest between various neighborhoods to provide corridors for wildlife. He feels the existing condition at Alameda Point has "interesting" aesthetic qualities and he sees value in the historic buildings. He supports coordination with the VA NEPA process and questions the "loss" of the wildlife refuge on the maps. Larry Tong, East Bay Regional Park District, stated that the East Bay Regional Park District owns the Bay Trail within the AP project site, along with other facilities south of West Hornet Avenue. EBRPD looks forward to working with the City and participating in the plan. Laura Thomas, Renewed Hope, reiterated that the plan should provide more housing, a minimum of 4,500 units stating that the development will depend on housing because the employment aspect is uncertain. She stated that multifamily housing generates less greenhouse gases than single-family units and the streets should be narrow with more bikeways, transit, and parks. Jon Spangler, resident, stated the EIR must evaluate hazardous materials because Alameda Point is a Superfund site. He agrees that the plan should have more housing and while he supports the 4,500 units others have suggested, he could live with 3,000 to 3,500 units if carbon emissions are shown to be lower. He is concerned that the Navy's cleanup of Alameda Point is not good enough as the members of the Alameda Point Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) have mentioned, and with regards to future parks and housing people need the ability to garden in the ground and not in pots. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 32, Alameda Point should reduce the City's carbon footprint. He believes the development should meet LEED standards, as per the Calthorpe Plan which should be an alternative in the EIR. The City will have to find other sources of funding to provide Bus Rapid Transit to Fruitvale BART and downtown Oakland. He supports coordination with the VA NEPA process and questions the "loss" of the wildlife refuge on the maps.… | PlanningBoard/2013-01-28.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );