pages
3 rows where "date" is on date 2010-01-06 and page = 2
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2010-01-06.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2010-01-06 | 2 | 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) There were no speakers. 6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY Member Matarrese discussed the visit to El Toro and Hamilton bases, particularly that the City of Irvine established a local development corporation to develop the Great Park. Member Matarrese would like to put an item on a future ARRA agenda to evaluate that particular option to see if it has utility for the ARRA or successor to the ARRA. He stated that Hamilton is farther along than most other bases - there are lots of houses; 10 hangars in use, eight of which have been rehabbed for public and private, with two hangars remaining in the Coast Guard. Member Matarrese recommends looking for potential military use for the hangars at Alameda Point. He stated that the most important and striking feature of Hamilton was that they were taking the runways and returning them to wetlands. Member Matarrese discussed that a wetlands option for the west end of Alameda Point might be a superior option to bolster the shoreline with an engineering solution. The wetlands are a carbon sink, and there may be future carbon credits; it filters runoff, provide better habitat for the environment and is a superior buffer to storm or wave action because it doesn't require maintenance. Vice Chair deHaan discussed that some of the dredging from the Port of Oakland was used for establishing that wetlands. Member Matarrese added that levies were built as well. Vice Chair deHaan stated that getting "tipping fees' is extremely important to jumpstart this type of operation. Chair Johnson liked the idea of wetland restoration. Member Matarrese reiterated that the ARRA remain insistent that the Navy scoop and remove Sites 1 and 2. Member Matarrese stated that there was concern expressed by two members of the RAB (one representative from the EPA and one from the Audubon Society) of rumors that the Bay Trail was in jeopardy, either from the Wildlife or the VA. Member Matarrese would like to find the source to the rumor to see if it… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2010-01-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-01-06.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2010-01-06 | 2 | between 23rd Avenue and Oak Street overcrossing would meet CalTrans standards; however; State funding needs to be invested right away. Mayor Johnson stated the Fruitvale Bridge is underutilized; diverting traffic from the Fruitvale Bridge is not good for Alameda; encouraged CMA to figure out solutions to the problems. Councilmember Matarrese stated clearances need to be addressed; having a cue going across the bridge is not acceptable; utilization of the Fruitvale Bridge crossing needs to be revisited. Councilmember Gilmore stated sometimes Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) have impacts that cannot be mitigated and a statement of overriding considerations needs to be adopted; inquired what entity would adopt the statement of overriding considerations. Mr. Todd responded an Environmental Assessment Initial Study (EAIS) is being performed, not an EIR; stated CalTrans would be the final signatory. Councilmember Matarrese questioned whether CalTrans could impose things on Alameda unilaterally. Mr. Gritz stated typically, CalTrans does not force things onto local agencies; the issue would need to be revisited if the unmitigated impact would delay the project. Mayor Johnson stated CMA needs to go back and figure something out. Mr. Gritz stated CMA has reviewed a tremendous amount of options; CMA wants to utilize the Fruitvale Bridge rather than impact Park Street; the cue back up along the 23rd Avenue/Park Street corridor is attributed to development forecasted to occur in Oakland and Alameda. Mayor Johnson stated the current design makes diverting traffic back to the Fruitvale Bridge from the freeway very difficult; a huge obstacle would be created. Councilmember Matarrese stated cars have already exceeded capacity on I-880; something different needs to be considered; that he is not sure the problem has an engineering solution. The Public Works Director stated that staff thought that an agreement was reached with CMA and would be included in the environmental documents, but it was not; the purpose of the presentation… | CityCouncil/2010-01-06.pdf |
CivilServiceBoard/2010-01-06.pdf,2 | CivilServiceBoard | 2010-01-06 | 2 | City of Alameda Page 2 of 3 Civil Service Board Agenda Regular Meeting of January 6, 2010 Member McHugh asked about the list of names for Police Officer and why this list was being presented to the Board in this manner. Chris Low stated that this is the first time the City has used the new system regarding the continuous postings of police officer positions. Executive Secretary Willis asked if in the future as new names are added, what would the Board see, the entire list or only the newly certified names? Chris Low responded that only the new names would be certified to the Board. Member McHugh stated that she thought this seemed like a good list. Chris Low stated that it is a good list but there are other steps that must be taken such as the background check which may potentially eliminate many of the names. Vice President Horikoshi moved to accept the consent calendar. Member McHugh seconded and the motion passed by a 4-0 vote. 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A Activity Report Period of September 1, 2009 - November 30, 2009 Executive Secretary Willis explained that she had inadvertently left out the Activity Report from their packet. It was handed out to the Board. Member McHugh asked about the reason for the two separations. Staff responded that one was due to a resignation and the other due to a death. 5-B Civil Service Ordinance Executive Secretary Willis told the Board that the Civil Service Ordinance was passed by Council and had a new number. It has since been placed on the City website. General discussion ensued regarding the process and how long it had taken for this ordinance to be updated. 5-C Update on Reduction-In-Force Executive Secretary Willis updated the Board on the status of the lay-offs at the Golf Complex. She stated that eight employees were separated, one got another job with the City and one decided to retire. There is a job opening with Public Works and the City is hopeful that will result in someone else being able to get a position with the City. Those employees laid off are eligible to app… | CivilServiceBoard/2010-01-06.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );