pages
1 row where "date" is on date 2009-02-25 and page = 7
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TransportationCommission/2009-02-25.pdf,7 | TransportationCommission | 2009-02-25 | 7 | relatively few recommendations affected Alameda, and that many of the difficulties affected the portions of the line in Oakland and Berkeley. The options for service modifications were a major part of the report, including the possibility of splitting the route into two different routes; possibly having a limited and local service; or the creation of alternating A and B stops. Cory Lavigne, District Service and Operations Planning Manager, noted that the report contained a robust public outreach process. He noted that they would like the input of the Transportation Commission before commencing the public outreach process. He introduced Puja Sarna and Sean Diest Lorgion from his office, who wrote the document. Puja Sarna noted that this route was the source of most of the complaints received by AC Transit. Sean Diest Lorgion presented a PowerPoint presentation on the overhead screen, and described the route. He noted that Line 51 was one of AC Transit's most important routes, and the most heavily used, with close to 20,000 daily riders, almost 8% of the total district ridership. The service operated virtually around-the-clock, covering 13 miles, with service every 8 minutes during peak hours, every 10 minutes during the midday, and every 20 minutes during the evenings. There were roughly 80 stops per direction, providing great accessibility for the passengers. He noted that it generally operated at 9 mph in the PM peak hours, at a daily average of 12 mph; some segments were 6-8 mph. He noted that there was large variability in running times, and that the buses frequently bunched up. He noted that the goals of the task force were increase travel time of the route, improve service reliability, increase passenger comfort, while retaining riders. He noted that they conducted point checks to calculate running time along the route, and that the variability in running times made it difficult to write a schedule for Line 51. Puja Sarna noted that with respect to route-wide improvements, AC Transit recommended having signa… | TransportationCommission/2009-02-25.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );