pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2006-10-04 and page = 3
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2006-10-04.pdf,3 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2006-10-04 | 3 | Page 3 forward in negotiating a lease for these specific areas. Member deHaan expressed his desire that EBRPD continue to be involved in the area and asked how the funding stream would be maintained in the future. Mr. Anderson indicated that possibly a small assessment district would have to be established if the project becomes larger. Member Matarrese stated that he would like a long-term commitment from EBRPD for the area. The consensus among ARRA members and EBRPD was the first priority is extending the Bay Trail from the boat ramp along the beach to the Hornet; if additional funds remain, the other areas will be considered. Member Matarrese motioned that EBRPD make improvements on the Bay Trail from the existing boat ramp as far north as possible, including cleaning up the beach. If additional funds remain, they would be used for the picnic area and former RV parking lot. Staff was directed to negotiate a lease with EBRPD to accomplish this. Member Daysog seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. 3-B. Alameda Point Project Update. Debbie Potter, Acting Alameda Point Project Manager, gave an Alameda Point update presentation to the Board. The presentation included a chronology of the ARRA's negotiations with the Navy and an explanation to the community on how we went from "no cost" to paying $108.5 million for the Navy property. Ms. Potter also discussed the master developer, APCP's, election not to proceed with the project and presented staff's recommendation for an initial next step. Ms Potter summarized the genesis of how we got from a no cost EDC to a 108.5 million dollar purchase price: She explained how the ARRA's PDC and the general plan call for over 3 million square feet of commercial development. In January 2004, however, the Navy sent a letter requesting that we submit a formal amendment to our "no-cost" EDC application to formerly make the case about why we felt like we continued to be eligible for a "no-cost" EDC. The Navy's letter further stated that it could not continue to work w… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2006-10-04.pdf |
CivilServiceBoard/2006-10-04.pdf,3 | CivilServiceBoard | 2006-10-04 | 3 | City of Alameda Page 3 Civil Service Board Minutes Regular Meeting of October 4, 2006 agreement. Board President Robles-Wong asked whether the new classifications created a competitive situation for the individuals who were re-assigned into a new job title, and questioned whether or not those individuals were required to re- test. Executive Secretary Willis stated that none of the individuals involved were required to re-test for their positions. Board President Robles- Wong expressed concern that if the Civil Service Rules were not followed, the employees who were re-assigned were not being protected by the system that was designed to do just that. He suggested that there should be a special meeting called in cases when individuals are involved. Member Rich also requested a special meeting to discuss personnel actions and procedures, and Member Peeler agreed. The Board agreed that a special meeting would be scheduled for mid- November. Member Rich moved to approve item 4-D with the understanding that staff will agendize a separate item on the next agenda to provide procedural background on the reclassification process. Member Peeler seconded the motion and was carried by a 3-0 vote. 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A Activity Report - June 1, 2006 through August 31, 2006. Executive Secretary Willis presented the Board with Turnover Statistics as requested by Board Member Rich at the July 12, 2006 meeting. She stated that the report showed percentages of resignations, retirements and other separations for Miscellaneous and Safety employee groups back to the year 2001. She explained that resignations had risen significantly in the last two years. Member Rich asked if there was any idea why. Executive Secretary Willis stated that some employees obtained jobs in other cities for better retirement or due to the fact that they had not gotten a pay increase with the City, and others had resigned for personal reasons. 5-B Proposed Change to Civil Service Ordinance, Section 2, Merit Principal 3. Executive Secretary Willis state… | CivilServiceBoard/2006-10-04.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );