pages
1 row where "date" is on date 2006-09-11 and page = 5
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard/2006-09-11.pdf,5 | PlanningBoard | 2006-09-11 | 5 | Member McNamara was pleased that the applicant had made changes to address Mr. McCarver's concerns about shading and his quality of life in the main area of the house. She respected the applicant's property rights, as well as the feedback from the neighborhood. She was inclined to deny this project as presented at this time. Member Cunningham did not believe the Municipal Code restricted a two-story extension, and was similarly compelled by property rights and the concerns of the neighbors. He did not believe the elevations had been drawn correctly. He noted that when the bedroom was pulled back, the roof pitch was pulled back as well, affecting the stair. He noted that the shading study for the morning of February 28, the side of Mr. McCarver's house showed two shaded areas, including by the stairs. "The eave ridge line of the main roof had been incorrectly drawn, and was about three feet higher than it should have been above the grade level at that point." He had considered ways to eliminate the shadow cast by the stair. He described the details of his suggestion and displayed them on the overhead screen. Member Kohlstrand agreed with Member Cunningham's assessment, and also understood the interests of the neighbors as well as the property owner. She was uncomfortable with the idea of restricting the ability of anyone on the street from adding a second story to their house in the future. She was encouraged to see redesign of the structure to address the shading issues, and would like to see a solution to further reduce the shading impacts. She did not feel comfortable denying this project because it caused additional shadow on the adjacent property. Member Ezzy Ashcraft appreciated staff's responsiveness to the Planning Board's concerns, and expressed concern about parking. In response to her inquiry about parking, Ms. Eliason confirmed that two off-street parking spaces were required for this property because it is less than 3000 square feet total; it met Code with respect to parking. Member Ezzy Ashcraft note… | PlanningBoard/2006-09-11.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );