pages
1 row where "date" is on date 2005-06-02 and page = 5
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 5 | Vice-Chair Anderson stated that there was too much of a difference between the Historic Theatre and the proposed cineplex and parking structure - not compatible with historic standards. A stronger connection is needed - cited the Livermore example. Secretary Eliason stated that the Planning Boards May 9 preliminary design approval was to provide consistency for the Section 106 findings study. Boardmember Tilos stated that the vertical elements needed work. Chair McPherson suggested making a recommendation requiring clear anodized aluminum. Vice-Chair Anderson would like to ask the architect to design an alternate façade. Chair McPherson stated that the Oak Street façade needs to be looked at. Boardmember Miller stated that it would be a good idea to "Send it back to the drawing board. " Chair McPherson stated that she did not think it was awful but it could be reworked. Boardmember Lynch stated that we began with the preliminary massing design that was a building with a refrigerator box at the corner and now we are presented with a building with a grain silo on the corner. It is still not compatible. She recommended telling Rob Henry to take a look at his design for Livermore. Chair McPherson stated that greater design detail on the façade was needed and the vertical elements needed to be more consistent. Boardmember Lynch stated that true Art Deco moldings and details could be introduced and cited the example of the apartment building on the corner of Shattuck and Haste in Berkeley. Chair McPherson summarized as follows: 1) more attention to the Oak Street façade; 2) use elements like Livermore; 3) use clear anodized aluminum framing; 4) more attention to vertical elements; 5) more Art Deco details; 6) the architect needs to revisit the Livermore project elements for an alternative design. Ms. Ott noted that the Livermore project had been brought up at a previous Planning Board meeting. Mr. Henry had cited the Alameda projects' site constraints compared to Livermore. Chair McPherson noted that Art Deco elements … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );