pages
3 rows where "date" is on date 2005-05-12 and page = 2
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-05-12.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2005-05-12 | 2 | 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. Provide Direction to the Acting Executive Director regarding the term of the lease extension for Building 613 Sublease Agreement between the ARRA and Alameda Point Collaborative. Debbie Potter requested direction on a sublease between the ARRA and APC for building 13 which is currently being used as an office to house the Red Cross. She gave a brief history of the lease and requested extension thru Dec 31, 2006 SO that it coincides with the overall development plan for Alameda Point. Several representatives from APC spoke in support of a lease extension until 2012, including Doug Biggs and Jim Franz. In response to Member Matarrese regarding the time frame for development of that parcel, Bill Norton replied that plans are for the Navy to turn that property over to the City at the end of 2006. Stephen Proud, Alameda Point Project Manager, also noted that if we reach an agreement with the Navy and the developer at the end of 2006, infrastructure and geotechnical work would start in 2007 After discussion from Boardmembers regarding the timing of development, Chair Johnson advised that it would make more sense to have the shorter term now and consider a longer term when we know more at the end of Dec 2006, supporting staff recommendation. Staff recommendation accepted and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes-5; Noes-0 Abstentions-0 5-B. Study Session of the FY 2005-06 ARRA Budget Bill Norton, acting Executive Director, introduced this item with an overview of Part 1 of the Budget Study Session. Leslie Little, Development Services Director, presented Part 2 - a summary of the FY 2005-06 ARRA Budget - by walking the Board through the staff report. She discussed overriding issues: the pro forma and the development assumptions at Alameda Point. Member DeHaan raised the question regarding $1.8M that should be absorbed back into the general fund. Bill Norton confirmed Member DeHaan's comments and advised the Board of a new proposed budget for 05-06 for all city funds, including the general … | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-05-12.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-12.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-12 | 2 | Councilmember Daysog inquired what the outside attorney could do that the Council could not do. Mayor Johnson stated that the Council does not provide attorney services the City Attorney would have a conflict of interest in advising the Council on her contract. Councilmember deHaan moved approval the recommendation predicated on further discussion of the scope of work in closed session. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that a discreet number of issues are of concern; that he was not clear on the conflict. Mayor Johnson stated there would be a conflict if there are legal issues; requested further explanation from the Assistant City Attorney. The Assistant City Attorney stated if Council asks a legal question regarding interpretation of any provision of the City Attorney' S contract or requests the contract be approved as to form, there would be a conflict; the City Attorney would not be able to provide information [legal advice] another attorney's services would be necessary. Mayor Johnson noted that Council has to hire an attorney to sign [approve the form of ] the City Attorney's contract. Councilmember Daysog stated that the City of Oakland requested the City of San Francisco to comment on whether the Oakland City Attorney position should be an elected position. Councilmember deHaan stated the Council needs to understand and clean up the mechanisms of the contract, and ensure the contract language is legal. Mayor Johnson stated when the contract has been changed on a routine basis, outside attorneys have signed [approved the form of ] the contract without communicating with the Council, which is not a very good procedure. Councilmember deHaan stated that the Council is requesting more detailed information. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the Council is trying to determine the history of the current situation and review salary scales; an Special Meeting Alameda City Council 2 May 12, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-05-12 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of Facility Photos/Inventory - (Information Only Item) Justine Highsmith, Senior at Clayton Valley High School, as a senior she needed to do a community project for school and she chose Alameda because she thinks it's a charming City. She worked with the Recreation and Park Department and took pictures of its various facilities. Ms. Highsmith took approximately 1,000 photos and narrowed it down to 300 pictures that were put on a CD and presented to the Commission. Ms. Highsmith provided a Power Point presentation of the photos to the Recreation and Park Commission. B. Proposed Recommendation to Provide Additional Parking (Neptune Park) for Independence Plaza Residents - (Discussion/Action Item) Mike Pucci, Housing Authority Executive Director, requested additional parking for Independence Plaza residents by using part of Neptune Park. The area that will be used will have little impact on Neptune Park. Neptune is not a well used park. It is a gateway to the City and any parking built there will have minimal impact on the visibility of the parking lot. There will be berms around the parking lot with extra landscaping to hide the cars. The Federal Government placed a deed restriction on Neptune Park when it was transferred to the City. The deed restriction limits the use of the land to parkland, but the governemnt will lift the restriction if additional parkland of equal value is put in its place. The Board of Commissioners (who are City Council) recommend that the deed restriction transfer to the EBMUD property adjacent to Towata Park. The funds would come from the Open Space fund. AD Lillard stated that the EBMUD property, in its current condition, is not actual usable park space. Mr. Pucci stated that it is being proposed that the deed restriction be place on the Parrot Mini-Park. The Housing Authority would continue to maintain the park. Commissioner Reeves asked if the parking would be strictly for Housing Authority and Housing Authority employees. Mr. Pucci stated that it would … | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );