pages
18,746 rows
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-09-07.pdf,1 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-09-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, September 7, 2011 The meeting convened at 7:12 p.m. with Chair Gilmore presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) None. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR (*11-063) Approve the Minutes of the Special ARRA Meetings of July 13, 2011 and July 19, 2011. Member Tam moved for approval of the Consent Calendar. Member deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS None. 5. ORAL REPORTS (11-064) Oral Report from Member deHaan, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) Representative - Highlights of August 4, 2011 RAB Meetings. Member deHaan stated that Site OU-2C, a major contamination area, was discussed. The site has been worked on in many phases. The RAB has set an alternative for Site D-6 which is $16M, stating that the Navy wants to go with the $5.8M. The issue is still being discussed and under evaluation. 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) None. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS (11-065) Provide Update on Status of Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Process and Redevelopment of Alameda Point. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated that LBNL members visited the site and were given a guided tour and presentation. LBNL and consultants are currently reviewing site submittals. In Sept/Oct staff will compile one final response. LBNL stated that they will review final submittals and make a recommendation to the UC Regents in Regular Meeting ARRA September 7, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-09-07.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-09-07.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-09-07 | 2 | November. Regarding the larger redevelopment of Alameda Point, there are ongoing negotiations with the Navy re: conveyance of property, continuing conversation with State Lands re: Tidelands Trust Exchange. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point will come back to the ARRA with updates in the next couple of months. Member deHaan asked to confirm the LBNL timeline. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point explained that the UC Regents meets every two months, if the timeline were to slip, or if they were not ready to make a selection in November, the issue will slip to the next meeting in January. The City Manager informed the Board that staff has informally heard that the selection may indeed slip to January, but reassured the Board that staff is completely ready and has not asked for any extension as others have. Alameda is on time, on budget, and will be ready for a November meeting if it happens. Staff is urging a prompt decision. 8. REFERRALS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 9. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY Member deHaan discussed that the Associated Community Action Plan (ACAP) will have their last meeting next week. He recommends that community members view their audit, which was released to the public. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:19 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary Regular Meeting ARRA September 7, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-09-07.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-10-05.pdf,1 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-10-05 | 1 | 80 UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, Ocotber 5, 2011 The meeting convened at 7:07 p.m. with Chair Gilmore presiding. Chair Gilmore requested that the Pledge of Allegiance be added to the ARRA agenda. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) None. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR (*11-069) Approve the Minutes of the Special and Regular ARRA Meetings of September 7, 2011. Member deHaan moved for approval of the Consent Calendar. Member Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (11-070) Approve Term Sheet between United States Navy and the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority for No-Cost Conveyance of Alameda Point. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point summarized the Term Sheet. Pursue no-cost conveyance for LBNL, Navy Comprehensive conveyance strategy for entire base - discussed the major terms. Next steps to negotiate amendment to existing economic development conveyance memorandum of agreement bring back to ARRA for approval. The Acting City Attorney asked the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point to explain the Environmental Review of the term sheet. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point explained that Alameda Point does not constitute a project under CEQA, therefore the Board is able to approve the term sheet without conducting additional environmental review. Speaker: Diane Lichtenstein, HOMES, congratulated staff on a job well done after 14 years. Ms. Lichtenstein discussed hope for the housing plan to move ahead, and hopefully with LBNL at the Point. Regarding the enforcement provision of the market rate residential, Chair Gilmore requested confirmation that the City will not have to pay the $50,000 fee per unit to the Navy. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in t… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-10-05.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-10-05.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-10-05 | 2 | 81 Member Tam discussed the City's other obligation to provide work-force and affordable housing. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point informed the Board that since staff has been receiving a lot of inquiries regarding remediation, there will be a presentation from the Environmental Consultant, Peter Russell, at the November ARRA meeting. Chair Gilmore stated that, in addition to the no-cost conveyance, the City gets control over the land. This is a valuable opportunity to develop more long term leases because we can provide tenants with certainty. Member deHaan recognized and thanked the members of the BRAG and other numerous community organizations over the past 15 years. Chair Gilmore joined Member deHaan in recognizing the community organizations that brought us to this point. Member Bonta moved to approve the Term Sheet. Member Tam seconded the motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by a roll call vote: Member deHaan - Aye, Member Johnson - Aye, Member Tam - Aye, Vice Chair Bonta - Aye, Chair Gilmore - Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0. Abstentions: 0 5. ORAL REPORTS (11-071) Oral Report from Member deHaan, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) Representative - Highlights of September 1, 2011 RAB Meetings. Member deHaan introduced Richard Banger, RAB member, who was present in the in audience. Mr. Banger compiled a great amount of information on the history and activity regarding the remediation of Alameda Point on his website: www.alamedapointenvironmentalreport.com The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point added that, with Mr. Banger's help, key information about remediation will be included on the City's website. Staff is also working with the Environmental Consultant, Peter Russell, to provide a less technical, shorter executive summary, but have technical minutes still available. 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) Carol Gottstein, Alameda citizen, spoke about the base cleanup and informed the public about the repository at City Hall West which includes a large amount of inform… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-10-05.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-10-05.pdf,3 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-10-05 | 3 | 82 None. 9. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary Regular Meeting ARRA September 7, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-10-05.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,1 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, November 2, 2011 The meeting convened at 7:32 p.m. with Chair Gilmore presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) None. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR (*11-073) Approve the Minutes of the Special Meetings of September 20, 2011 and the Special and Regular Meetings of October 5, 2011. (*11-074) Approve a 47-Year Legally Binding Agreement with Alameda Point Collaborative for Buildings 802, 803, 806, 809, 810, 811 and 812 (30 Units of Housing) and Authorize the Executive Director to Execute the Agreement and any Related Documents. Chair Gilmore pulled Item 3-A (minutes) to make a correction. Member Tam moved for approval of the balance of the Consent Calendar. Vice Chair Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Member Tam moved for approval of Item 3-A with the corrections. Vice Chair Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (Note: Chair Gilmore and Member Johnson abstained from approving the Minutes of Sept. 20, as they were not present at that meeting). [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (11-075) Presentation on Status Report of Environmental Conditions of the Alameda Point Site. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point introduced the Environmental Consultant of the Alameda Point Project, Peter Russell, Russell Resources. Dr. Russell provided a powerpoint presentation on the status of the remediation and environmental issues of Alameda Point. Dr. Russell's remediation experience includes numerous sites: Fort Ord, Tustin Air Station, Benicia Arsenal, Mission Bay clean up, and the Southern and Union Pacific rail yards in Sacramento. Member deHaan commended Dr. Russell and the RAB for all their efforts in the environmental program of Alameda Point. Speakers: Dale Smith, Community Cha… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 2 | Chair Gilmore thanked Dr. Russell and members of the RAB for their technical expertise and diligence over the decade and more. 5. ORAL REPORTS (11-076) Oral Report from Member deHaan, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) Representative - Highlights of October 6, 2011 RAB Meetings. Member deHaan echoed the statements from Dr. Russell's presentation and reminded the public that the remediation is ongoing, and that a vast majority of property will be given to the ARRA with certain restrictions. 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) None. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS None. 8. REFERRALS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 9. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary Regular Meeting ARRA November 2, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,3 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 3 | Response to Comments on Status Update for the ARRA Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting - November 2, 2011 Time Comment Marker Response Comments by Dale Smith, Alameda Point Restoration Advisory Board Community Co-Chair 33:49 The residential standards are for groundwater only, and they At Alameda Point, cleanup to residential standards means are not for soil. So the soil has high levels of lead, mercury, that the health risk and health hazard from both soil and cadmium, vanadium, and other toxic metals in the soil that is groundwater (combined) are health-protective for single- not being addressed. family residential land use; which is the most stringent land- use standard. This principle applies to both the CERCLA (Full Comment: The talk of residential standards, when I talk and Petroleum Programs. Accordingly, the concentrations of to community members, they seem to get confused because toxic metals in soil are explicitly considered by the Navy the residential standards are for groundwater only, and they and the environmental regulatory agencies in deciding are not for soil. So the soil has high levels of lead, mercury, whether soil remediation is needed to allow residential land cadmium, vanadium, and other toxic metals in the soil, and use and, if so, the type and extent of that remediation. that is not being addressed as far as we can tell.) 34:14 Slide 13 represents the CERCLA sites only. There are Contamination in soil and groundwater at Alameda Point is petroleum sites that move in and out of CERCLA. One addressed by either the CERCLA or Petroleum Program, month they'l be in, and the next month they'l be out. For whichever appears to be most appropriate. For example, a example, the plume under Kollmann Circle originally was in site with petroleum contamination is typically managed the petroleum site, got put in the CERCLA site. under the Petroleum Program, unless non-petroleum contamination also is present. Occasionally, management of (Full Comment: The graphs in the document, according to a … | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,4 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 4 | Response to Comments on Status Update for the ARRA Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting - November 2, 2011 Time Comment Marker Response remediation. However, the cleanup is going on for much contamination. The remediation of many Alameda Point longer than that. For example, the RAB had a presentation groundwater contamination sites follows two principal on one site (groundwater at OU-2B), where the cleanup was steps. The first is an initial phase, during which the going to take 22 to 35 years, and there'll be severe contamination, especially the source area, is treated, for restrictions on the use of that site. example by injection of chemicals or by heating. The second phase typically consists of periodic groundwater (Full Comment: Cleanup as defined in the presentation, as I sampling to monitor progress of natural processes in further read it or I hear it, means the active remediation done by the reducing contamination concentrations. The first phase often military, meaning trucks and things are out there. Scoops are takes three years or less. The second phase lasts until clean- digging up dirt. Otherwise the cleanup is going on for much up goals are reached. The commenter is correct in that the longer than that. We had a presentation on one site two second phase can last for several decades, as in the example months ago where the cleanup was going to take 22 to 35 of Operable Unit 2B (OU-2B). years, and there'll be severe restrictions on the use of that site. So bear that in mind.) During the second phase, land-use restrictions may be applied to protect monitoring wells and to prevent use of the groundwater. Depending on the type of groundwater contamination, land-use restrictions may also require that building designs include vapor barriers, special ventilation, etc. to safeguard public health. Land-use restrictions during the second phase typically do not preclude most uses of the site. Thus, "severe restrictions" on land use typically apply only to the first few years of cleanup. 35:44 Quite a … | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,5 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 5 | Response to Comments on Status Update for the ARRA Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting - November 2, 2011 Time Comment Marker Response technologies, which eventually don't work, and cost a lot of Alameda Point. In such cases, a pilot test (a form of money. So, but they, the Navy then is able to make experiment) typically is conducted to evaluate how well the presentations to scientific boards saying that they tried this technology would work. A pilot test of in-situ thermal technology and it did not work.) treatment to treat groundwater was tried at OU-2C and found to be very cost-effective. Alternatively, a pilot test of nano-zerovalent-iron injection was tried at OU-2B and found not to be effective. In both cases, the Navy and the environmental regulatory agencies unanimously agreed the pilot testing (experimenting) was a prudent way to evaluate the promising technology. The principal instance where experimentation with technologies has occurred at Alameda Point is regarding groundwater in another area of OU-2B. In this case, a university and an EPA national laboratory approached the Navy for permission to conduct an experiment on groundwater contamination. The experiment was primarily funded externally, and the information obtained by the project has improved clean-up decision making for OU-2B groundwater. 36:16 An "active cleanup" site on Slide 13 means a site for which The "Active Cleanup" column in the graph on Slide 13 the regulators have signed off on site characterization and includes sites which have completed their RODs and design remedial investigation, and is to move on to Proposed Plans, or implementation of the active remediation is in progress. RODs, and Work Plans. So a lot of sites in that category Sites that are in the Proposed Plan or draft ROD stages are don't have those in place yet, but they're put in the active categorized on Slide 13 as "Under Investigation" CERCLA cleanup column anyway. requires that remedial activities in the field begin within fifteen months of completing… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,6 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 6 | Response to Comments on Status Update for the ARRA Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting - November 2, 2011 Time Comment Marker Response there are Proposed Plans, RODs, and Work Plans. So a lot of it doesn't have those in place yet, but they're put in the active cleanup column.) 36:46 The presentation (Slide 15) indicated portions of the The IR Site boundaries on Slide 15 accurately reflect the Northwest Territories are white (outside of IR Sites). But BCT's current understanding of the extent of radium in soil most of these areas have recently been found to have radium at Northwest Territories. Within the last few years, the contamination in soil. There is no plan for remediation of boundaries of the site in the area the comment references this contamination. (IR Site 32) were expanded to account for low-level radium contamination in soil extending over a greater area than was (Full Comment: The map showed the Northwest Territories originally recognized. The Navy is currently completing an to be white, but they have recently been found to be covered extensive radiological survey of soil in this area. The with radium to a depth of a half foot to a foot and a half, as I preliminary results from this investigation indicate that the recall, in most of it. And there has been no plan as to how extent of radium in soil does not extend beyond the current that's going to be remediated, as far as we know.) IR Site boundaries (into the white areas shown on Slide 15). 37:09 Natural attenuation hasn't occurred for 60 years. Why expect Natural attenuation consists of a variety of natural processes it to occur in the next five or ten years? that reduce contaminant concentrations over time, usually relatively slowly: biochemical degradation, dispersion, (Full Comment: And one of, George Humphries, who is my volatilization, etc. These are commonly effective in cohort in this battle, likes to point out that natural attenuation reducing contaminant concentrations to remedial goals after hasn't occurred for 60 years. Wh… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,7 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 7 | Response to Comments on Status Update for the ARRA Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting - November 2, 2011 Time Comment Marker Response First, underground bacteria and other microbes degrade many contaminants, often an important component of natural attenuation. However, initial site conditions may include contaminant levels that are so high that they are toxic to the very microorganisms that, with more dilute concentrations, would readily consume the contamination as food. Thus, following an initial phase of active cleanup of the higher concentration zones, natural attenuation can proceed more effectively. Second, with initial high contaminant concentrations, the effect of natural attenuation often is not discernible. This is because of the inherent variability of sampling and analysis. A simple example illustrates this point. With an initial contaminant concentration of 10,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L) and an inherent sampling variability of plus or minus ten percent, duplicate sampling and analysis of the same groundwater could yield analytical results anywhere between 9,000 ug/L and 11,000 ug/L. Say for discussion purposes, that natural attenuation reduces the contaminant concentration by 10 ug/L each year. This rate of natural attenuation would be difficult to detect in a reasonable period of time by sampling. On the other hand, after an initial phase of active remediation that reduces contaminant levels, to say 300 ug/L, then analysis of duplicate samples would yield results between 330 ug/L and 270 ug/L (+/- 10%). Now, natural attenuation at a rate of 10 ug/L would be both meaningful and discernible by sampling and analysis. 37:25 Planting trees will not be allowed. Gardening and fruit Restrictions on digging are used sparingly at Alameda Page 5 of 5 November 7, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf,8 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-11-02 | 8 | Response to Comments on Status Update for the ARRA Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting - November 2, 2011 Time Comment Marker Response growing will be allowed, but digging a hole in the soil will Point: in only three instances. not. First, the Marsh Crust Ordinance restricts digging below the (Full Comment: And then to answer, I think, your question Threshold Depth, unless a permit is obtained first. about planting trees: no, you will not be able to plant trees. You'll be able to plant You'l be able to have a garden, Second, soil cleanup at North Housing (IR Site 25) was and you' 'll be able to grow fruit, but you will not be able to conducted in landscaped areas, but not under buildings or dig a hole in the soil.) pavement. Accordingly, major site work is restricted without first obtaining approval from the BCT. Additionally, digging deeper than four feet below ground surface at North Housing is prohibited without approval from the BCT. These restrictions may affect tree planting. In any case, BCT approval would be granted provided digging were conducted while following a site management plan that appropriately manages potential encounters with contaminated soil. Third, at Todd Shipyards (IR Site 28), a non-residential area, digging deeper than two feet below ground surface is restricted without first obtaining approval from the BCT. Page 6 of 6 November 7, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-11-02.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-12-07.pdf,1 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-12-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, December 7, 2011 The meeting convened at 7:21 p.m. with Chair Gilmore presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) None. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR (*11-081) Approve the Minutes of the Special and Regular Meetings of November 2, 2011. Member Tam moved for approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Chair Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (11-082) Presentation on Status of Disposition and Development Strategy for Alameda Point. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a power point presentation summarizing the next steps for moving forward with the no cost reconveyance and development strategy for Alameda Point. Staff is providing the update to the Board before moving into the next phase of making recommendations. The summary focused on entitlement, transportation infrastructure, solicitation and transaction. Speakers: Carol Gottstein discussed maximizing the land value of Alameda Point, specifically Building 94, Chapel. Chair Gilmore stated accountability issues are a downside to Phased Development. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point explained the key is to have really good design up front, and guiding documents that dictate how larger engineering and structure will work globally, so that the design is solid. There is concern about different developers doing backbone infrastructure for small pieces. Having a uniform developer for larger, 100- acre parcels, would narrow accountability issues with fewer people. Member Tam discussed concerns about funding of predevelopment costs, backbone infrastructure, and that the days of tax increment bond funding may not be available because of the elimination of redevelopment. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Poi… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-12-07.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-12-07.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-12-07 | 2 | With reasonable costs, a developer can provide ideas to test assumptions. ARRA has a fund balance, with a certain amount spent on planning. Options will be explored to find ways to leverage for upfront costs. Staff is exploring other sources of low cost capital with contingencies built into the costs, with the same analysis used for other options. Vice Chair Bonta inquired about the developer role as an advisor to ARRA. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point explained that ARRA would be the property owner and maintain control over entitlement process. With the understanding that ARRA is not a developer, put out an RFQ for a development advisor, with a recommendation that the advisor actually be a developer with experience working on large-scale projects, not just a consultant. In this advisor role, the developer would actually work for the ARRA, are paid a monthly fee, but their contract can be terminated by the ARRA. The advantage from a transaction standpoint is that it would be a simple contract; the advisor has no actual rights to development or land. The concept is that the ARRA maintain control, work in a partnership, but ARRA would be the leader. Vice Chair Bonta inquired if there are any examples of that type of partnership. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated that Hamilton AFB is a similar example. Hamilton hired a team of advisors, which included attorneys and economic consultants who planned and entitled all of Hamilton. They did an RFQ with developers and negotiated purchase and sale, but had entitlements all upfront. Member Johnson expressed concern about handling the most difficult parcels or areas that will take longer to clean up. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point discussed starting up efforts and creating value will make the property more valuable. Less money is taken out of the project by a master developer, which leaves more money in the project for development itself. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point informed the Board that staff would be coming back to… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-12-07.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-12-07.pdf,3 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2011-12-07 | 3 | 9. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY Member deHaan gave a brief report on the December 1 RAB meeting. The main issue was the RAB's plan for ongoing years, specifically the schedule and frequency of meetings. The Navy proposed to meet on a quarterly basis to cut back on operations costs. Various options are still being explored, including teleconferencing capabilities. The RAB elected Dale Smith as Co-chair and Carol Gottstein as Vice Co-chair. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary Regular Meeting ARRA November 2, 2011 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-12-07.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,1 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, January 4, 2012 The meeting convened at 7:10 p.m. with Chair Gilmore presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) (12-001) Cara Kuhlman, Alameda, discussed starting dialogue with the ARRA to open a community sailing center program at Alameda Point. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR (*12-002) Approve the Minutes of the Special and Regular Meetings of December 7, 2011. (*12-003) Authorize the Executive Director to Execute an Amendment to an Agreement with Russell Resources for Environmental Consulting Services for Alameda Point Extending the Term for 12 Months and Adding $165,000 to the Budget. (*12-004) Authorize the Executive Director to Execute an Amendment to an Agreement with Carlson, Barbee & Gibson for Civil Engineering and Surveying Consulting Services for Alameda Point Extending the Term for 24 Months and Adding $74,400 to the Budget. Member Tam moved for approval of the Consent Calendar. Member deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (12-005) Award Contract in the Amount of $225,000 to Keyser Marston Associates to Prepare an Economic Development Strategy for Alameda Point. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point discussed the Office of Economic Adjustment $225,000 award to the ARRA to conduct economic development strategy. Member Johnson expressed concern that any economic strategy or plan may be irrelevant because of the elimination of the redevelopment agencies. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point explained that it is even more important to have a strategy in place and be prepared to attract industrial and commercial users that can help bring in the infrastructure. Member Tam inquired if there will be an increased dependency on private funds because of the… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,2 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 2 | Member deHaan expressed concern about how to address the community process. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point explained that there was feedback from the community that there is a bit of fatigue on community meetings. The focus now is to engage the tenants. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point agreed with Member deHaan that the Economic Development Commission and other formal bodies should be engaged. Vice Chair Bonta moved for approval of the staff recommendation. Member Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (12-006) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Memorandum of Agreement between the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and the United States Navy for the Economic Development Conveyance of Portions of the Former Naval Air Station Alameda. Chair Gilmore stated that although the No-Cost Economic Development Conveyance is overshadowed by the redevelopment news, it is still amazing and exciting news. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point agreed and provided a summary of events. The ARRA approved a term sheet with the Navy on October 5, 2011. The term sheet contemplated a no-cost conveyance of Alameda Point from the Navy to the ARRA consistent with the 1996 Reuse Plan. The Term Sheet became the final amendment to the existing 2000 Memorandum of Agreement with the Navy. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point discussed the changes, including the conveyance schedule, the enforcement mechanism, use of proceeds, and the addition of submerged lands. The conveyance schedule contemplates a vast majority of the property coming to the ARRA by the end of 2012. Chair Gilmore thanked staff for working tirelessly and effortlessly over the years to make the No- Cost Economic Development Conveyance happen. Proponent: Helen Sause, Housing Opportunities Make Economic Sense (HOMES). Member Tam moved for approval of the staff recommendation. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Chair Gilmore requested a roll-call vote be conducted: Vice Chair Bonta - aye, Member deHaan - aye… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,3 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 3 | 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS The Executive Director re-emphasized the news of the ARRA receiving portions of Alameda Point at a No-Cost Conveyance. 8. REFERRALS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 9. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY None. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary Regular Meeting ARRA January 4, 2012 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,4 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 4 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY- -JANUARY 4, 2012--6:00 P.M. Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 6:05 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to closed session to consider: (12-015) Conference with Labor Negotiators (54957.6); Agency Negotiators: Human Resources Director and Masa Shiohira; Employee Organizations: Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA), Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA), International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), and Police Officers Non-Sworn (PANS). Following the closed session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore announced that the labor negotiators provided the status of negotiations with four bargaining units: IBEW, ACEA, PANs, and MCEA. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council January 4, 2012 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,5 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 5 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (HABOC) MEETING WEDNESDAY- -JANUARY 4, 2012- -7:02 P.M. Mayor/Chair Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:51 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Allen, Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor/Chair Gilmore - 6. Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. AGENDA ITEM (12-017 CC) Resolution No. 14634, "(1) Determining It Will Serve as a Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda ("CIC"); (2) Electing Not to Retain the Housing Assets and Functions Previously Performed by the CIC; (3) Authorizing Assumption by the Housing Authority of the City of Alameda ("Housing Authority") of the Rights, Powers, Assets, Liabilities, Duties, and Obligations Associated with the Housing Activities of the CIC; and (4) Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with the Housing Authority to Fund Costs Associated with the Transferred Housing Activities." Adopted; and (12-001 A HABOC) Resolution No. 836, "(1) Agreeing to Assume the Rights, Powers, Assets, Liabilities, Duties, and Obligations Associated with the Housing Activities of the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda; and (2) Authorizing the Executive Director to Enter Into an Agreement with the City of Alameda to Fund Costs Associated with the Transferred Housing Activities." Adopted. The Housing Development and Programs Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Gilmore stated redevelopment agencies would cease to exist on February 1st, but agreements for 400 redevelopment agencies would not suddenly come into existence on February 2nd The Housing Development and Programs Manager stated agreements would exist because of each agency's enforceable obligation schedule. In response to Mayor/Chair Gilmore's inquiry, the Housing Development and Programs Manager stated the County Auditor-Controller would need to audit each agency's enforceable obligation schedule by July 1st. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam inquired wheth… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,6 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 6 | automatically established by ABX1 26, to which the Housing Development and Programs Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Gilmore stated on February 1st, responsible agencies would start expending funds in the normal course of business; hopefully, reimbursement would be set in place on July 1st. The Housing Development and Programs Manager stated an administrative budget needs to be presented for each successor agency by February; the legislation has some inconsistencies; last year, an obligation schedule was done which predicted payment obligations pursuant to enforceable obligations; the next one would be due March 1st, which would cover January 1st to June 30th; schedules would need to be approved by the Oversight Board that would review work of the successor agency; the Oversight Board would not come into existence until May 1st; suggested amending Section 7 to read: "This resolution shall take effect and be enforced as of the deadline for adoption of this resolution established pursuant to State law as may be amended from time to time". Councilmember/Commissioner Tam's inquired whether the City could recover money, to which the City Manager/Executive Director responded the money has not been submitted yet. Mayor/Chair Gilmore stated the State was not hitting budget targets before the ruling; it appeared that automatic cuts would go into effect; the State will not receive $1.7 billion due to legislation being declared unconstitutional. The City Manager/Executive Director stated that the State has centralized what the payments would be but has created chaos throughout the system. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Bonta stated things are moving very quickly; that he wants to ensure that the City does not do something it will regret later; inquired what precautions would be taken if another legislative remedy caused the City's successor agency role to not be advantageous, to which the City Manager/Executive Director responded the resolutions could always be amended. In response to Vice Mayor/Commissioner Bonta… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,7 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 7 | affordable housing; stated the need would not go away. Councilmember/Commissioner Johnson stated the City receives allocations from the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG); without said money, houses cannot be built regardless of the allocations. The City Manager/Executive Director stated redevelopment has been the primary economic development program in California; without economic development, there is no money for schools or work force housing; that he predicts the State would replace some functions but would do so in a centralized, clunky way rather than in a flexible, nimble, and local manner. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired how other municipalities are handling the issue, to which the Housing Development and Programs Manager responded Alameda would be the first to act on the matter. The City Manager/Executive Director stated that redevelopment pays for police officers, half of the Mayor, Council, and Auditor's salary, which otherwise would need to come from the General Fund; everything would have to made up from the General Fund; the City has never honeycombed redevelopment. Mr. Mandelman stated the landscape is rapidly changing and the law is drafted poorly; there will be many messy situations over the next months; the City would be taking on responsibility to manage some of the chaos by becoming the successor agency; management would be done by an unfriendly Oversight Board. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Bonta inquired whether another path or second best approach might be adequate but would not be as good as the one recommended tonight. Mr. Mandelman responded tonight's recommendation is the only way to go if the City wants to be a successor agency; stated otherwise, the Governor would appoint County residents. Mayor/Chair Gilmore stated Council has tried for a number of years to get Alameda Point from the Navy so that the City could have local control and have a say in how things move forward. The Housing Development and Programs Manager stated the City would want local control over the Alame… | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,8 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 8 | housing marketing objectives; the City would have to find some way to be more marketable and needs to fight fiercely. The Acting City Attorney/Legal Council stated a lot of new ideas would be forthcoming. Mr. Mandelman stated the California Redevelopment Association and League of California Cities are actively focusing on State goals but would include goals important to Alameda such as Base reuse and housing. In favor of resolutions: Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, and Jon Spangler, Alameda. Mayor/Chair Gilmore expressed appreciation to staff for acting so quickly on the matter; stated the recommendation is viable. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Bonta inquired whether tonight's recommendation would be the only way to exercise local control, to which Mr. Mandelman responded that he thinks so. In response to Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan's inquiry, Mr. Mandelman stated the deadline for dissolution is February 1st; up to that time, the legislature would have an opportunity to come up with something that would work for communities that have bases that need to be redeveloped; the deadline for deciding whether to be a successor agency is January 13th The Chief Operating Officer stated that she has a conference call scheduled for 8:30 a.m. tomorrow with base reuse communities. Councilmember/Commissioner Johnson moved adoption of the resolutions with noted amendment to Section 7. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners 4 January 1, 2012 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,9 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) MEETING WEDNESDAY- -JANUARY 4, 2012--7:01 P.M. Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:49 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Boaro Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor/Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmembers/Board Member Johnson moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Board Member Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (12-016 CC) Resolution No. 14642, "Appropriating $379,000 in Federal HOME Funds and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Necessary Documents to Complete the Loan to the Alameda Point Collaborative for Acquisition of 240 Corpus Christi, 230 Corpus Christi, 2471 Orion, 2451 Orion, 201 Stardust, 251 Stardust, and 271 Stardust ("Property").' Adopted; and (12-008 ARRA) Recommendation to Approve Financing on the Property in the Amount of $2,279,000. Accepted. AGENDA ITEM None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority January 4, 2012 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -JANUARY 4, 2005 - -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 7:53 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS ( 05-003 - ) Presentation on the basic requirements for an Indian Tribe to operate a Casino in California. The Assistant City Attorney provided a brief report on the basic requirements to conduct tribal gaming. Mayor Johnson stated that the purpose of the presentation was to inform the public on the required process for the Koi Tribe to obtain approval for a casino; stated that presentation tapes would be available for public review and that the public should direct questions to the City Attorney's office. Michael Scholtes, Bay Isle Pointe Home Owners Association, stated that he opposes the proposed casino. Mayor Johnson requested staff to place a resolution opposing the proposed casino on the next City Council agenda. Rosemary Cambra, Mowekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, submitted a handout and cautioned the Council on taking a stance against the proposed casino. Councilmember Daysog stated that Council would need to exert pressure and fight on behalf of the City. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to approve Agreement between the Alameda Unified School District and the City of Alameda [paragraph no. 05-010], the Resolution Authorizing Open Market Purchase [paragraph no. 05-012], and the Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code [paragraph no. 05-016] were removed from Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 2 | the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*05-004) - Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on December 21, 2004. Approved. (*05-005) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,037,089.03 (*05-006) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $127,102.65 to Stewart & Stevenson for Ferry Vessel Reduction Gears, No. P.W. 10-04-15. Accepted. (*05-007) Recommendation to terminate the Contract with J.W. Riley & Son, Inc. for Alameda Point Multi Use Field, No. P.W. 12-02-18 and authorize project completion. Accepted. (*05-008 - ) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $45,000 to Maze and Associates for Financial Modeling Services. Accepted. ( *05-009) Recommendation to accept Annual Review of the Affordable Housing Ordinance. Accepted. (05-010) Recommendation to approve Agreement between the Alameda Unified School District and the City of Alameda for Use and Development of Real Property at the K-8 School and Park site in the Bayport Residential Development Project. Mayor Johnson stated that the Agreement facilitates the goal for having the school and the park built near the Bayport residential area. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is funding for the Preschool and Tiny Tots at the Community Building, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*05-011) - Recommendation to accept the Bayport Residential Interim 115Kv overhead power line improvements and authorize recording a Notice of Completion. Accepted. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 3 | (05-012) - Resolution No. 13807, , "Authorizing Open Market Purchase from Allied Sweepers, Inc., Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter, of Green Machine Sidewalk Cleaning Equipment. " Adopted. Sherri Stieg, West Alameda Business Association (WABA) thanked the Council for their efforts with the Webster Street project. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she was happy to see the project progressing; she would like to see the trees replaced as soon as possible. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is pleased with the progress; requested periodic progress reports on the Streetscape Project. Mayor Johnson stated schedule updates should continue to be provided. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( *05-013 - ) Resolution No. 13808, "Approving Parcel Map No. 8401 (2340 and 2350 North Loop Road). " Adopted. (*05-014) Resolution No. 13809, "Reappointing T. David Edwards as Trustee of the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District. " Adopted. (05-015) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Subsection 3-28.9 (Payment In-Lieu of Taxes - PILOT) ; Adding a New Subsection 3-28.10 (Return on Investment in Enterprise Funds) of Section 3-28 (Payment of Taxes) of Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) and Adding a New Subsection 18-4.10 (Exemptions) of Section 18-4 (Sewer Service Charge) of Article I (Sewers) of Chapter XVIII (Sewer and Water) . Introduced. Councilmember Daysog stated that increasing the Return on Investment (ROI) to 3% could cause some impacts; encouraged the Council not to vote tonight and place the matter as an action item for the next City Council meeting; $782,000 would be received from Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) by staying at the original proposal of 1% ROI; if the $782,000 is relayed back to the rate payer, the monthly bill could be increased from $1.53 to $2.03. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 4 | Councilmember Daysog moved introduction of the ordinance with direction that the matter be brought back to Council if there would be any cause for rate increases. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*05-016 - ) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding a New Section 3-91 (City of Alameda Community Benefit Assessment Procedure Code) to Article VI (City of Alameda Improvement Procedure Code) of Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) . Introduced. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (05-017) Recommendation to reappoint Mary Rudge as Alameda's Poet Laureat. The Recreation and Parks Director outlined the nomination process. Lisa Piatetsky, Executive Director Alameda City Art Council, stated that she looks forward to having Ms. Rudge continue as Alameda's Poet Laureat. Mary Rudge, Alameda, submitted a handout i outlined poet activities; thanked the Council for acknowledging and encouraging poetry. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 5 | Nina Serrano, Alameda County Arts Commission, commended the Council for having a Poet Laureat. Mosetta Rose London, Alameda, thanked the Council for the dedication of the O'Club to Al DeWitt and for placing her poem on a plaque at the O 'Club; read a poem that she wrote. Nanette Bradley Deetz, Alameda Island Poets, read a poem that she wrote about Alameda. Ken Peterson, Vice President, Alameda Island Poets, stated the program has been a tremendous success for poetry and for the City. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-018 ) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board's denial of Major Design Review DR04-0013 and Variances V04- 0005, V04-0015, V04-0016, V04-0017 to permit the construction of a rear deck and garage addition that was completed without City permits. The rear deck measures thirty inches in height from grade to the top surface of the deck and is built up to the south (left side) and west (rear) property lines. The garage addition is an expansion of the existing single-family dwelling up to the north (right side) and west (rear) property lines. The Applicant is requesting four (4) Variances to permit the construction of the work completed without permit including: 1) Variance to Alameda Municipal Code (AMC) Subsection 30-5.7(c) (2) (6) to construct a rear deck that measures thirty inches in height and is constructed up to the south side and rear property line with zero setback, where a minimum three foot setback is required for decks measuring twelve to thirty inches in height; 2) Variance to AMC Subsection 30- 5. 7 (e) (1) to construct an unenclosed stair and landing up to the south side property line with zero setback, where a minimum three foot setback is required for unenclosed stairs and landings 3) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-4.4(d) (7) to construct an attached garage addition that extends the main dwelling up to the rear property line with zero setback where a… | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 6 | (05-018A) Resolution No. 13810, "Upholding the Planning Board's Denial of Major Design Review DR04-0013 and Variances, V04-005, V04-0015, V04-0016, V04-0017 for the Structural Expansion of a Single-Family Residence and Construction of Rear Deck at 913 Oak Street. " Adopted. The Supervising Planner provided a presentation on the background of the project. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the garage was a two-story structure connected to the house, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the garage was intended to be more than a one-car garage, to which the Supervising Planner responded that the plans indicate a one-car garage with storage on the left side. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there was a proposal for the upstairs portion of the garage, to which the Supervising Planner responded the photographs show an attic with a couple of chairs and table. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the garage doors are smaller than the width of the driveway there is a vent pipe that comes down along the side of the house and protrudes into the driveway which would make it very difficult for a car to enter the garage. The Supervising Planner stated many driveways are challenging in terms of access. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she is concerned with the intent of using the garage for the proposed use. The Supervising Planner stated that the Parking Ordinance requires that garages be kept free of structures to accommodate a vehicle. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the garage could abut the property line if detached from the house; once the garage is attached to the house, there are side and backyard setback issues. The Supervising Planner stated the Code allows for garages to abut both the side and rear property lines under certain circumstances the front of the garage needs to be 75 feet from the front property line and there needs to be a 5-foot separation between the main house and the garage a detached garage could comply with the 75- foot regulation; she is not sure… | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 7 | separation because there is a small addition at the rear of the house which might result in less than a 5-foot separation; a smaller detached garage might require a modest variance. Mayor Johnson inquired what was the square footage of the garage, to which the Supervising Planner responded approximately 300 square feet. Mayor Johnson inquired what was the square footage of a typical garage, to which the Supervising Planner responded a one-car garage would be approximately 200 square feet. Mayor Johnson inquired why the garage was larger than a typical garage, to which the Supervising Planner responded that the residents wanted storage. Mayor Johnson inquired when the original garage was demolished, to which the Supervising Planner responded possibly a few years ago. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there was a deck variance involved. The Supervising Planner responded that the deck required a variance because it is 28 inches from the grade decks 12 inches from the grade or less are allowed to encroach into yards decks between 12 and 30 inches require a -foot separation from the side and rear property line; there is an opportunity to modify the deck by either reducing the height, which would result in a deck that is not level with the house, or by reducing the size of the deck to provide the required set back. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there was a height limit on backyard fences, to which the Supervising Planner responded the limit is 6 feet for a solid fence and 8 feet for a fence with 2 feet of lattice on top. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there was an 11-foot fence in the yard, to which the Supervising Planner responded that staff is not clear who owns the fences that surround the property. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the fence issue would be pursued regardless of tonight's decision, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. Proponents (In favor of appeal) : Fred Hogenboom, Alameda, and Ursula Hogenboom, Alameda. Regular Meeting Alame… | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 8 | Opponents (Opposed to appeal) : Raymond A. Pacovsky, Sr., Alameda; Raymond S. Pacovsky, Jr., Alameda, and Barbara Kerr, Alameda. Mayor Johnson stated the initiation of construction without permits makes the permitting process difficult; inquired whether the Appellant informed the Planning Board that the structure was over his property line. The Appellant responded in the negative; stated that the structure is well within the property line; the structure was moved 2 inches inward from the original garage. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how tall the spa was from the floor of the deck to the top of the spa, to which the Appellant responded three and a half feet at the most. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the Planning staff recommended dropping the deck approximately 12 inches; inquired whether the 12 inches would equate to two steps. The Appellant stated that he would need to put in three steps to lower the deck 12 inches. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether accommodating his wife was part of the reason for having the deck the same level as the house. The Appellant responded that his wife has had two back surgeries and three hip replacements; stairs are difficult for her. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there is a two-foot hop to get into the spa which appears to be more difficult to navigate than the stairs out of the house. Mayor Johnson stated that one of the reasons for deck height limits is because high decks and spas are an intrusion into neighbors' backyards inquired how the footprint of the original garage was established. The Supervising Planner responded that the Appellant submitted plans in 1991 for foundation work at the front of the house which indicate that there is a separation between the back of the house; the then existing garage did not seem to be as close as the current plans show. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Appellant put siding on the neighbors' structures, to which the Appellant responded that he put sheet metal up to prevent rotting. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 9 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Appellant asked the neighbors before putting up the sheet metal, to which the Appellant responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson inquired what would happen if the variances are denied, to which the Supervising Planner responded that two things could happen; the Appellant could work with staff for a solution that would allow a garage and deck that is either fully in compliance or would require a more modest variance or the Appellant could file a lawsuit against the City. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Appellant has paid fines, to which the Supervising Planner responded investigative fees and fees for working without the proper planning permits have been charged. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the Hearing. Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution upholding the Planning Board's decision and denying the Appeal. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated there was only one decision that the Planning Board could have made given the circumstances; encouraged the owner to work with the Planning Department to salvage the intent of the project within the requirements of the Code. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she assumes that the Appellants had the best of intentions; the Code clearly specifies detached garage and addition requirements; the project is attempting to be both an addition to the house and a garage stated future owners could convert the garage into a living space. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-019) - Discussion regarding assistance for tenants at Harbor Island Apartments. Mayor Johnson stated that rent control issues are not on the agenda tonight but that the public is free to speak under Oral Communications The Housing Authority Executive Director gave a brief presentation regarding the assistance provided to the Harbor Island Apartment Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 10 | tenants. Speakers John Sullivan, San Leandro, Mark Harney, Fifteen Asset Management Group; Kathy Lautz, Apartment Owners' Association; Lorraine Lilley, Harbor Island Tenant Association; Eve Bach, Arc Ecology Tom Matthews, Renewed Hope; Steve Edrington, Renal Housing Association; Delores Wells, Harbor Island Tenant Association (submitted letter) ; Modessa Henderson, Harbor Island Tenant Association; Mary Green-Parks, Alameda; Gen Fujioka, Asian Law Caucus; Reginald James, Alameda; Michael Yoshii, Alamedal; and Bill Smith, Alameda. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there are a total of 17 units currently occupied, to which Mr. Harney responded there are 17 units that are occupied by tenants with leases; there are 9 units occupied by tenants who have stopped paying rent. Mayor Johnson inquired whether relocation assistance would still be available to the remaining tenants with leases, to which Mr. Harney responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how many Harbor Island Apartment tenants remained in Alameda, to which Mr. Harney responded that he was not certain; not all tenants provided forwarding information. Councilmember deHaan requested information on the number of Section 8 tenants that remained in Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese stated that Council wants to know what the immediate issues are in dealing with individuals who are still occupying units at the Harbor Island Apartments and what assistance can be provided; inquired whether there are housing assistance opportunities for the remaining tenants through Community Development programs or Sentinel Fair Housing. The Community Development Manager responded that the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program contracts with Sentinel Fair Housing and the Red Cross; Sentinel Fair Housing has been involved with a number of the tenants; CDBG funds are also being used to produce new affordable housing units through the Substantial Rehabilitation Program; several of the units would be available to applicants who previously resided at the Harbor Isla… | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there was a way to work with the Apartment Owners' Association to help the remaining tenants. The Community Development Manager responded there could be some coordination for specific interventions that may help the tenants the cash to provide deposits is a longer-term consideration and might be more difficult without reprogramming of funds. Mayor Johnson requested staff to review loan possibilities. The City Manager stated that he would work with staff to find solutions. Councilmember Matarrese stated aggressive action is needed to help the remaining tenants. Councilmember Daysog stated that most families would like to remain at the Harbor Island Apartments but the courts have ruled otherwise and they must move; the City needs to see what can be done to facilitate the situation in a manner that dignifies the tenants. the Council needs to pursue the best policy that prevents the Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-020 - ) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated that the Webster Street construction has posed a danger to bus passengers at the bus stops. The Assistant City Manager stated that the construction work has been delayed because of the rain; stated he would discuss the situation with the Public Works Director. (05-021) Reginald James, Alameda, encouraged the reappointment of Mary Rudge as Alameda's Poet Laureat; stated that he was concerned about a sign stating that there may be a possible reproductive harmful environment at the Harbor Island Apartments ; stated that there should be another meeting of the Harbor Island Task Force. (05-022) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed earthquakes. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-023) Councilmember Matarrese welcomed Interim City Manager, Bill Norton. Mayor Johnson welcomed the Interim City Manager to his first Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 12 | Council Meeting. ADJOURNMEN'T (05-024) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular City Council meeting at 11:15 in a moment of silence and sympathy for the tsunami victims in Southeast Asia. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 13 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -JANUARY 4, 2005- - -6:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-001) Public Employment; Title: City Manager. (05-002) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Title: City Attorney. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that the Council discussed Public Employment and recruitment of the new City Manager, and Public Employee Performance Evaluation of the City Attorney. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-05.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING WEDNESDAY - - - JANUARY 5, 2005 - - - 5:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 6:05 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers / Commissioners / Authority Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Joint Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (05-025CC/05-001CIC Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property : Alameda Naval Air Station, Fleet Industrial Supply Center; Negotiating Parties City of Alameda, Community Improvement Commission, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Alameda Point Collaborative; Under Negotiations Price and terms. Following the Closed session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Council/Commission/ Authority gave direction to follow the negotiating approach recommended by the real property negotiator. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority January 5, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 18, 2005 - -7:30 P.M. Acting Mayor Gilmore convened the Regular Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Roll Call - Present Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. [Note: Mayor Johnson was present via teleconference from The Capital Hilton, 16th and K Street NW, Washington DC only for the Resolution Opposing the Proposed Casino paragraph no. 05-037]. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES (05-027) Councilmember Matarrese moved that the Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of J. Barni [paragraph no. 05-034]; the Public Hearing to consider amendment to Zoning Map [paragraph no. 05-035]; and the Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of Rita Mohlen [paragraph no. 05-036] be moved to the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Louncilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese and Acting Mayor Gilmore - 4. [Absent Mayor Johnson - 1. ] (05-028) - Councilmember deHaan moved that discussion regarding options for relocation assistance legislation [paragraph no. 05- - 040] be heard first on the Regular Agenda. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes Councilmembers Daysog and deHaan -2. Noes : Councilmember Matarrese and Acting Mayor Gilmore - 2. [Absent : Mayor Johnson - 1. ] PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (05-029 ) Proclamation declaring January as Blood Donor Month in the City of Alameda. Acting Mayor Gilmore read and presented the proclamation to Beth Wren, Donor Recruitment Account Manager. Ms. Wren thanked the Council for their support of the Red Cross and announced that there will be a blood drive on Friday in San Leandro at the Creekside Community Church. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 2 | Michael John Torrey, Alameda, commented on the importance of donating blood. (05-030) Presentation by Peter Simon, Dean, College of Alameda and Liz Sullivan, Organizer with Oakland Community Organizations regarding the proposed Oakland Aviation High School at the Oakland Airport. Withdrawn by presenters. (05-031) Presentation of letters of appreciation to members of the Alameda Police Department by NC1 Danielle Carter, Recruiter, Naval Reserve Recruiting Area Pacific. NC1 Randy Montrose, Recruiter in Charge, Naval Reserve Recruiting Area Pacific, presented letters of appreciation to members of the Alameda Police Department ; Sergeant Jill Ottaviano, Alameda Police Department, accepted the letters of appreciation on behalf of the Alameda Police Department. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar, including continuing the Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of J. Barni to February 1; continuing the Public Hearing to consider Amendment to Zoning Map to February 1; and noticing the Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of Rita Mohlen for a later date. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent Mayor Johnson - 1. ] [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*05-032) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meeting of December 21, 2004; the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on January 4, 2005; and the Special Joint City Council, CIC and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of January 5, 2005. Approved. (*05-033) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,049,755.31. (05-034) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board's approval of Design Review, DR04-0101, to allow a 5,300 square foot new commercial building (veterinary hospital) to replace approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial buildings, with a parking lot expansion to 23 spaces; and adoption of related resolution. The property is located at 1410… | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 3 | (*05-035) Public Hearing to consider Amendment to Zoning Map to rezone approximately 7,800 square feet (1/5 acre) at 1410 Everett Street, APN 070-170-15, from R-5 Hotel Residential to C-C Community Commercial and (*05-035A) - Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map to Designate APN 070-170-15, Approximately One-Fifth Acre, from R-5 Hotel Residential to C-C Community Commercial, on Central Avenue at Everett Street. Continued to February 1, 2005. (*05-036 - ) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board's denial of Variances, V04-0006, 0007, 0008 and 0010, and denial of Major Design Review, DR04-0026, for all development projects at 3017 Marina Drive; and adoption of related resolution. The site is located within an R-1, Single-Family Residential Zoning District. The development project includes expansion of the residence into the estuary and installation of rear yard decks. Approval is being sought for the following: 1) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-4.1(d) (3) (Maximum Main Building Coverage exceeding 48%) i 2) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-4.1(d) (7) and Section 30-2 (Rear Yard) because the building extends across the rear property line into the estuary 3) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-5.7(a) (Roof Eaves) and 30-5.7(d) (Bay Windows) because the roof leaves above the bay windows encroach to within 3 feet from the side property line and bay windows are not permitted to encroach into side yards; 4) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-5.7(c) (1) (Rear Yard) , Subsection 30-2 (Definitions) (Yard-Rear) and Subsection 30- 4. 1 (d) (7) (Rear Yard) because decks over 36-inches in height extend into the required side and rear yard setbacks 5) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-5.14(c) (Barrier Heights) because the windscreens around the patios exceed the maximum permitted - -foot height. The Planning Board found that the Variance for the bay window encroachment be withdrawn because encroachment is in compliance, subject to Design Review approval. Applicant/Appellant: Rita Mohlen. To be noticed for a later date… | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 4 | Chamber's Town Hall Meeting. Mayor Johnson stated that the Council needs to send a strong message in support of the Resolution opposing the Rancheria-Koi - Nation proposed casino; Alameda's vote, along with the City of San Leandro, Alameda County, and the City of Oakland, will send a strong message to the Bureau of Indian Affairs stated she had the opportunity to speak with Congressman Stark and that he will support Alameda in their efforts. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the casino proposal is not good for Alameda, the adjoining wildlife refuge, the City of Oakland and is a false economy that he would oppose any casino by any tribe in any urban area; he hopes that there is unanimous support of the Resolution. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he joins his colleagues in opposing the casino; Council should consider joining the City of Oakland in pursuing legal issues. Mayor Johnson stated that she has spoken to the Interim City Manager and meetings have already taken place Alameda is working with San Leandro to jointly respond to the environmental documents; staff is working with the City of Oakland; Alameda County should be included in pooling resources to save money in the battle opposing the casino. Councilmember Daysog stated that there should be an amendment to the Resolution which would include directing the City Attorney to work with colleagues in the surrounding jurisdictions to actively oppose the proposed casino. Mayor Johnson stated that the Resolution should be very strong, clear and precise regarding Alameda's position on the casino; that she would prefer to give separate direction to staff to work with the surrounding communities and Alameda County. Acting Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Councilmember Daysog was amicable to giving staff direction, to which Councilmember Daysog responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated that he commends the Council in taking the lead;… | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 5 | Counci lmember Daysog stated that he opposes the proposed casino for a number of reasons, including crime and the urban planning impacts on Alameda and other cities. the proposed casino is only one of a wave of casinos to come which are inappropriate for the area. Councilmember deHaan stated that the Oakland City Council wanted to ensure that Alameda has no desire to have a casino. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( 05-038) Public Hearing on Housing and Community Development needs for Community Development Block Grant Annual and Five-Year Plans. The Community Development Manager gave a brief presentation on the housing and community development needs. Councilmember Daysog requested an Off Agenda Report update on the Section 8 funding. Jim Franz, American Red Cross, urged the Council to encourage the continuation of a balance of service provisions that provide a safety net in the community. Hugh Cavanaugh, Alameda Food Bank, stated there has been a 50% growth in the past three years and that he expects the growth to continue over the next few years. Steven Currie, Social Services Human Relations Board (SSHRB), read a letter from SSHRB encouraging the Council to continue the safety net services and programs that empower and support residents' efforts toward self-sufficiency. Councilmember Matarrese thanked the Social Services Human Relations Board for their work; stated that he looked forward to receiving the Board's recommendations. (05-039) Report regarding Corrective and Preventive Plan in response to the Memorandum on Internal Control Structure. Acting Mayor Gilmore stated that the matter was being discussed because Council requested staff to respond to questions resulting from the City's annual audit. Councilmember Matarrese requested information on the amount of the fund balance deficit ; inquired whether the list of items in the audit recommendation regarding the budget represents surplus or Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 6 | deficit. The Finance Director responded that she would provide the information to Council. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to have the requested information coordinated with the budget information provided in the first week of February. Acting Mayor Gilmore stated that the City has become dependant on Information Technology services system failure would result in countless hours of lost productivity; Council should carefully review the costs of addressing the issue and prioritize accordingly. Councilmember Daysog stated that the Plan makes a lot of the internal mechanisms of the City transparent; requested information on the debt reserve compliance issues. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether bonds are typically refinanced without the qualification process. The Finance Director responded there would be a competitive bid process if a bond is straight forward and uncomplicated; complicated bonds would be negotiated; the underwriters would respond to the Request for Proposal (RFP) stating what could be done at what price; staff would then recommend a selection to the governing body. Councilmember Daysog requested that the bond bidding process be placed on a future agenda for discussion; stated that it is important for Council to be involved in the bidding of bonds and in the decision not to bid. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the City's retirement and health benefit costs have increased dramatically; the City's Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) contribution increased 615% from 2002 to 2004. (05-040) Discussion regarding options for relocation assistance legislation and a temporary moratorium on all new construction, demolition and condominium conversion in the "West End Atlantic Corridor Area" (bounded by Webster Street, Main Street, Pacific Avenue and Ralph J. Appezzato Memorial Parkway). The Interim City Manager provided a brief outline of the Harbor Island Apartment eviction process and staff's coordinating efforts to financially help the remaining tenants move. Regular Meeting Alam… | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 7 | Acting Mayor Gilmore stated that the Council would not be taking action tonight; public testimony would be taken and the matter would be continued to the February 1, 2005 City Council Meeting ; the two meeting nights constitute one meeting; stated speakers can speak at tonight's meeting or on February 1, but not at both. Proponents: Regina Tillman, Alameda; Steven Garner, Alameda; Frank Skiles, Alameda Gretchen Lipow, Alameda; Ron Salsig, Alameda; Wendy Horikoshi, Alameda; Janet Gibson, Alameda Unified School District; Reginald James, Alameda; Eve Bach, Alameda; Carl Halpern, Alameda;Mary Green Parks, Alameda. Opponents: Dominic Pasanisi, Alameda; Barbara Kerr, Alameda; Fern Wallace, Alameda; Bernie Fitzgerald, Alameda; Melinda Samuelson, Alameda; Steven Edrington, Alameda [submitted handout] ; Carol Martino, Realty World Martino Associates; John Sullivan, San Leandro; Kathy Lautz, Apartment Owners Association; Thomas S. Cooke, Manager, Bonanza Apartments; Carmen Lasar, Alameda: and, Monica Getten, Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the City Attorney provide an analysis of existing State law which might overlap with the proposed ordinance, particularly landlord and tenant relationships stated that there is plenty of State law protecting individual tenants in contracts with landlords; he is concerned that there is not much protection for the community; there is significant impact on the community and the schools when owners choose to wipe out a large complex; the matter is not about rent control he has never supported rent control, which has always been a failure; there has never been a complaint about rent being too high, only complaints that rent is too high for the services not being delivered. Acting Mayor Gilmore requested information on how many properties have 40 units or more and the total number of units in the "West End Atlantic Corridor Area", and requested staff to provide information on how the ordinance would work in the absence of rent control. (05-041) Ordinance No. 2934, "Amending the… | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 8 | close the gap in the budget shortfall; moved final passage of the Ordinance. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion Councilmember Daysog, stated that he was concerned about the possibility of a charge on either cable or electric bills; it is important to be upfront with the public regarding the $750,000 and the possibility of recouping the money through rate charges. The Interim City Manager stated impacts would be determined through the Alameda Power and Telecom (AP&T) budget processi stated that there are always trade offs in the budget. Councilmember Daysog stated that he supports the Ordinance, which is the more conservative approach given the different options presented. Councilmember deHaan stated that there is a good likelihood that something would need to be massaged; AP&T should not go through a disproportionate adjustment. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Mayor Johnson - 1. ] (05-042) Ordinance No. 2935, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding a New Section 3-91 (City of Alameda Community Benefit Assessment Procedure Code) to Article VI (City of Alameda Improvement Procedure Code) of Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) . " Finally passed. Councilmember Matarrese moved final passage of the Ordinance. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Mayor Johnson - 1. ] ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-043 - ) Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the budget review process would take two months. The Interim City Manager outlined the budget adoption process and stated the mid-year budget review addresses expenditures and Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 9 | revenues through the end of December and should be addressed at the first or second meeting in February. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Acting Mayor Gilmore adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:02 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 10 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 18, 2005 - -6:30 P.M. Acting Mayor Gilmore convened the Special Meeting at 6:33 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, and Acting Mayor Gilmore - 4. Absent : Mayor Johnson - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-026) - Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Human Resources Director and Craig Jory; Employee Organizations : Management and Confidential Employees Association and Police Association Non-Sworn. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Acting Mayor Gilmore announced that the Council gave directions to labor negotiators. Adjournment There being no further business, Acting Mayor Gilmore adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JANUARY 18, 2005 - - - 6:55 P. M. Acting Chair Gilmore convened the Special Meeting at 7:15 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, and Acting Chair Gilmore - 4. Absent : Chair Johnson - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-002) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.91 Number of cases: One. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Acting Chair Gilmore announced that the Commission obtained briefing from staff. Adjournment There being no further business, Acting Chair Gilmore adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 12 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JANUARY 18, 2005 - - - 7:25 P. M. Acting Chair Gilmore convened the Special Meeting at 7:42 p.m. Commissioner Daysog led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, and Acting Chair Gilmore - 4. Absent : Chair Johnson - 1. MINUTES (05-003) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meetings of December 7, 2004; the Special Joint City Council and CIC Meeting of December 21, 2004; and the Special Joint City Council, CIC and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of January 5, 2005. Approved. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent : Chair Johnson - 1. ] Note: Commissioner deHaan abstained from voting on the December 7 and 21, 2004 Minutes. AGENDA ITEM (05-004) Recommendation to approve a contract with Michael Stanton Architecture for design review services for the proposed Historic Alameda Theatre, Parking Structure and Cinema Multiplex Project in an amount not to exceed $92,500. Commissioner Matarrese stated the contract is one step closer to getting the theatre; moved approval of the staff recommendation. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent Chair Johnson - 1. ] ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Acting Chair Gilmore adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary Agenda for meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 17, 2006--7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:11 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (06-029) - Mayor Johnson encouraged the Alameda High School students and Troup 73 Boy Scouts attending the meeting to learn about local government; stated the City has good job opportunities. (06-030) Proclamation declaring February 3, 2006 as "Wear Red for Women" Day in Alameda. Mayor Johnson read the proclamation; stated the proclamation would be forwarded to the American Heart Association. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. . ] ( *06-031) - Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on January 3, 2006. Approved. ( *06-032) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,585,271.93. ( *06-033) Recommendation to accept the City of Alameda Investment Policy. Accepted. (*06-034) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to execute the fifth amendment to the Measure B Funding Agreement and fourth amendment to the Measure B Project Implementation Agreement by and between the City of Alameda, the Alameda County Transportation Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 2 | Authority, the Port of Oakland, and the City of Oakland for the Cross Airport Roadway Project (Ron Cowan Parkway) Accepted. ( *06-035) - Recommendation to accept and authorize recording a Notice of Completion for the Bayport Stormwater Pump Station System Improvements. Accepted. (*06-036) Recommendation to authorize execution of a lead-based paint hazard reduction Grant Agreement with Alameda County Lead Poisoning Prevention Program. Accepted. (*06-037) Resolution No. 13920, "Approving the Application for California Cultural and Historical Endowment (CCHE) under the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection Act of 2002. " Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (06-038) Resolution No. 13921, "Appointing Michael B. Cooper as a member of the City Recreation and Park Commission. Adopted and (06-038A) Resolution No. 13922, "Appointing Dora J. Dome as a member of the City Social Services and Human Relations Board. " Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of appointment to Ms. Dome. (06-039) Resolution No. 13923, "Commending Alameda Police Lieutenant Bob Cranford for his contributions to the City of Alameda. " Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson read the Resolution. The Acting Police Chief accepted the Resolution on behalf of Lieutenant Cranford and expressed Lieutenant Cranford's appreciation for the Resolution. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 3 | (06-040) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Bayport Alameda Community Building and Park Project. The Redevelopment Manager provided a brief presentation. The Acting Recreation and Park Director presented drawings outlining the schematics for the proposed park site. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the restrooms would be separate from the community building. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded that the restrooms would be separate for park access. Councilmember deHaan stated the adjacent school property area has asphalt; inquired whether the area would be accessible at all times, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the proposed trees are appropriate for the climate, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there would be adequate drainage. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative; stated adequate drainage has been stressed throughout the design process. Mayor Johnson inquired whether sprinkler systems would cover the infield area. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded that the specifications would address specific sprinkler systems for the site. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the older parks have a lot of tree root issues; inquired whether root guards were considered. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative stated the design team was very conscience of tree type and placement. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the square footage of the multi-purpose room, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded 1,700 square feet. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 4 | Councilmember deHaan inquired whether other multi-purpose rooms were comparable in size. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the proposed multi-purpose room would be larger than most. Councilmember Daysog inquired what are the anticipated uses for the baseball and softball fields. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the use would depend on the age of the participants; stated two practices could be held at the same time for age groups under 12. Councilmember deHaan requested an explanation of funding sources. The Redevelopment Manager responded the funding sources come from project revenues such as land sale proceeds, residential profit participation, and tax increment. Mayor Johnson inquired whether adequate benches would be provided. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative; stated the play areas would have benches also. Mayor Johnson stated that the Joint Use Agreement was a great success; the City and School District benefit when resources are pulled together. The Acting Recreation and Park Director noted the new park would be the first park built since Tilden Park in 1993. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-041) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 2-18 (Alameda Film Commission) to Chapter II (Administration), Establishing an Alameda Film Commission, and Prescribing Membership and Duties of Said Commission. Introduced. The Development Services Director provided a brief report. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether neighborhoods, business districts, and areas at Alameda Point had filming opportunities in the past, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 5 | Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned with having only one neighborhood representative; he would prefer to have two at- - large neighborhood representatives neighborhoods are impacted business district representatives might not be Alameda residents. Mayor Johnson stated that she understood the Commission's role to be marketing, not daily management. The Development Services Director stated the permitting process would not change deposits are provided for police services. Mayor Johnson stated that times were restricted when filming was done on the bridge; police officers were present; pedestrians were notified of detours; the Commission's role should not be coordinating the activities. The Development Services Director stated that the Business Development Division Coordinator would work as the staff liaison to coordinate various activities; the Commission would help with inquiries and marketing; the State has developed a program to educate neighborhoods and raise awareness. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated filming has been done on her street over the last few years; the film production company sent someone out to explain the filming process; stated that the experience was positive. Councilmember deHaan stated that his neighborhood had mixed reviews with the filming processi the neighborhood needs to be involved with handling location requests. Mayor Johnson stated having someone familiar with the historical areas of Alameda is important. The Development Services Director suggested reducing the number of members with working knowledge of the film/video industry to three, adding a resident with knowledge of historic districts, and changing the "neighborhood member or Alameda Victorian Preservation Society representative" to "neighborhood member" Councilmember Matarrese suggested all members be Alameda residents, except business representatives. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated some film industry people work for employers in town and should be able to be considered; the bulk of the Commission should be Alameda residents… | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 6 | Alameda residents. The Development Services Director stated that the initial terms could be shortened to no longer than two years. Councilmember deHaan concurred with the Development Services Director; stated the terms should be staggered and reviewed; the number of business representatives could be reduced; he would prefer to eliminate the Chamber of Commerce representative. The City Attorney outlined the sections of the ordinance to be revised. Mayor Johnson clarified that the terms should be a maximum of two years. The Development Services Director stated terms could be for one and two years. Councilmember deHaan noted he would like the membership brought down to nine members. Councilmember deHaan moved introduction of the ordinance with the proposed amendments : [1) reduce the number of members with working knowledge of the film/video industry to three; 2) change the "neighborhood member or Alameda Victorian Preservation Society representative" to "neighborhood member; 3) add a neighborhood member with knowledge of historic districts; 4) require that the majority of the commissioners be Alameda residents; and 5) shorten terms to one and two year staggered terms) Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-042 - ) Public Hearing on Housing and Community Development needs for the Community Development Block Grant Annual Plan. The Development Services Director provided a brief report. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative (APC) , stated that he supports the recommendations of staff and the Social Services Human Relations Board (SSHRB) ; APC is building the capacity of the community; Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliance is a growing issue. Jim Franz, Alameda, stated he supports continued funding for safety Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 7 | net services special consideration should be given to organizations that provide education along with services; a disaster preparedness kit should be provided to low-income families. Robert Bonta, SSHRB, stated the SSHRB was pleased to weigh in on the public service needs employment, transportation, and child care are needed in addition to improving access to affordable housing; services are not being maximized; he hopes that SSHRB'S four focus areas guide in the decision making. Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated that extraordinary maintenance issues are coming up for the Housing Authority facilities the final Town Hall Meeting is scheduled for Thursday. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the meeting's focus was to gather information about extraordinary maintenance. Mr. Torrey responded that extraordinary maintenance is part of the focus information on proposed improvements is provided to residents; resident input is requested. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Mayor Johnson inquired whether extraordinary maintenance funding was available. The Acting Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated Housing Authority reserves and bond funds would pay for housing complex repairs; a physical needs assessment was conducted and approved; the physical needs assessment determines the type of improvements needed over the next 20 years. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the SSHRB did a terrific job in developing criteria; the criteria used to measure the performance of the organizations receiving the grants should align with the SSHRB's four focus areas to ensure that the money is well spent and goals have been achieved; improving access to affordable housing should include upholding anti-discrimination laws individuals need to be provided with an avenue to bring discrimination issues to the proper authorities; SSHRB'S criteria needs to be incorporated into the measurement of success to ensure that contractors know what is expected. Councilmember deHaan in… | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 8 | The Development Services Director responded staff was working on a new scope of work and information would be provided to Council. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was a possibility to receive more than the $1.3 million grant. The Development Services Director responded next year's total budget will be approximately $1.5 million with recaptured funds from loans; the outright grant will be approximately $1.3 million; program revenues and reclaimed dollars will be approximately $200,000. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the CDBG funding takes care of the Housing Authority's needs, to which the Acting Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Development Services Department's funding portion takes care of housing over and above the Housing Authority. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the majority of CDBG funding is for housing and rental rehabilitation. The Acting Assistant City Manager stated that the Housing Authority has used CDBG, HOME, and redevelopment funds in the past but does not plan to use the funding this year. Mayor Johnson inquired whether anyone's needs would be left out with the proposed Action Plan, to which the Development Services Director responded in the negative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether community service needs are reviewed periodically. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated Alameda goes beyond what is required; stated safety net provider participation is unbelievable. Mayor Johnson thanked the SSHRB and staff for all the hard work. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 9 | (06-043) Brien Burroughs, Glass Eye Media, stated that he is producing an independently financed television pilot at City Hall on Thursday and Friday barriers sometimes come up when filming at government sites; all his contacts in Alameda have been great ; stated he appreciates the support. (06-044) Patrick Lynch, Alameda, stated there is corruption in the Planning Department a resolution was passed by the Council on June 21, , 2005 which required the owner of a vacant lot adjacent to his home to conduct a specific soil test prior to receiving design review; the testing was submitted; the design review was approved and has been appealed to the Planning Board; he is unable to get a fair hearing with the Planning Board; staff refuses to provide accurate information; the City denies using the wrong section of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in approving the development; he received a $100 invoice to file a new form with the State; he received a $1600 invoice, which includes over five hours to discuss the project with City Attorney's office; the facts are undisputable; urged members of the Council to appeal the decision of the Planning Board. Mayor Johnson stated that Mr. Lynch should communicate his concerns with the City Manager. Mr. Lynch stated that he spoke with the Acting Assistant City Manager on Thursday and has not received a reply. The Acting Assistant City Manager stated that he spoke to Mr. Lynch, the Planning Department staff, and City Attorney's office last week; he still has one more person to contact; he will get back to Mr. Lynch. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (06-045 - ) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Economic Development Commission. Continued. (06-046) Councilmember deHaan stated streetscape funding was discussed at the last Council meeting he hopes that electrical provisions have been included to allow for embedded pedestrian lights [ on Park Street] between Central Avenue and Santa Clara Avenue when funding is available. ( (06-047) Councilmember deHaan stated … | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 10 | Mayor Johnson stated that she was concerned with the building at the corner of Central Avenue and Park Street the boards are down, but nothing is being done; inquired whether more controls are needed to ensure that owners remedy buildings within a certain amount of time. Councilmember deHaan requested information on applicable ordinances. The City Manager stated that information would be provided to the Council. (06-048) - Councilmember Matarrese stated that a vehicle inventory was discussed a few months ago; he would like Council to consider establishing a vehicle use resolution or policy so that the City can set an example; the resolution should include how vehicles are purchased, where to purchase alternative fuel vehicles such as natural gas and electric, and City vehicle use to reduce the number of single occupancy trips; requested that the use policy be brought back to the Council for consideration; the purchase of vehicles should follow. (06-049) Councilmember deHaan stated vehicle inventory is important ; he would prefer a separate line item in the budget to indicate the amount spent up front excess vehicles were auctioned over the last three or four months; a number of vehicles are no longer usable; the number of excess vehicles and future needs should be reviewed; uniform vehicle markings are extremely important. The City Manager stated that the replacement criteria were being reviewed; a general policy for alternative fuel would be provided to Council. Councilmember deHaan congratulated Alameda Power and Telecom for using hybrid cars; stated an inventory should be established vehicles should be replaced in a logical manner. (06-050 - ) Mayor Johnson stated that the athletic facilities' use policy should be brought to the Council for adoption by resolution or ordinance; the current policy is not compliant. The City Manager stated that staff is in the process of rewriting the policy. Mayor Johnson stated that she would prefer a formalized Council resolution. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 Januar… | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 11 | ADJOURNMENT (06-051) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:40 p.m. in a moment of silence for City Employee Matt Plumlee's family loss. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 12 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 17, 2006- -6:05 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:05 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. [Note : Councilmember Daysog arrived at 6:35 p.m. ] Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (06-025) - Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda V. City of Alameda. Rosemary McNally stated that she was not a party to the lawsuit, but had followed the Cineplex project since the Historical Advisory Board meeting in 2005; cited the Indemnificatior Clause in the Disposition and Development Agreement with the developer, Kyle Connor questioned why the City is paying for Mr. Connor's defense costs when the City says it does not have enough money for services. The City Attorney responded that the developer has his own attorney; the City has a large investment risk in the project and chose to retain its own counsel in order to best protect its own interests in the project. Ms. McNally thanked the Council for clarification and submitted copy of her statement for the record. (06-026) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees Association. *** Mayor Johnson called a recess at 7:55 p.m. and reconvened the Special Meeting at 9:45 p.m. (06-027) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators: Marie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee: City Attorney. . Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened Special Meeting 1 Alameda City Council January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 13 | and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, the Council discussed the case and stated staff would provide an Off-Agenda Report on the upcoming process; regarding Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees Association, the Council obtained briefing from labor negotiators; regarding City Attorney, the Council gave direction to labor negotiators. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting 2 Alameda City Council January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 17, 2006 -7:29 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 8:02 p.m. Councilmember Matarrese led the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call - Present : ouncilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. Agenda Item (06-028) Resolution No. 13919, "Authorizing Open Market Purchase Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter for the Repair of the Bay Farm Island Seawall Dike, along Shoreline Park, and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Such an Agreement. " Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the requested funding was for interim repair, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired when full repair would be completed and what the plan was for preventive maintenance. The Public Works Director responded the schedule for the full repair was being reviewed; larger ripraps would be added to strengthen the armoring of the slope; the design process would take approximately two to three months because a lot of surveying is required; funding is the big issue; the estimate is approximately $2 million for the riprap. Mayor Johnson inquired whether information has been provided to the public. The Public Works Director responded the area has been barricaded, and warning signs have been posted. Mayor Johnson requested that additional signs be posted along Shoreline Park to provide information on the seawall restoration and to thank the public for their patience. Councilmember deHaan stated the damage occurred because of high tides ; inquired whether further deterioration was evident. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 1 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 15 | The Public Works Director stated the entire length of the seawall has been inspected; the interim repair would take care of significant deterioration; the intent is to beat the high tides forecasted for the end of the month. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether erosion occurred in other areas. The Public Works Director responded the $500,000 should cover all areas that need repair. Mayor Johnson inquired whether periodic inspections are conducted. The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated future periodic inspections are being considered. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Governor added Alameda County to the disaster list; inquired whether funding would be available for the repairs. The Public Works Director responded that staff was working with the County and Office of Emergency Services (OES) to secure Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the deterioration was standard or the result of circumstances. The Public Works Director responded that the current situation is extremely accelerated; a resident raised the issue in March; staff examined the area in April and determined that immediate attention was not needed. Councilmember deHaan stated hopefully budget issues would not prevent performing a temporary fix if the City witnessed some deterioration. Mayor Johnson stated that issues should be called to the Council's attention if something similar arises. Councilmember deHaan thanked the Public Works Director for planting trees in front of Alameda College on Appezzato Parkway. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 2 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,16 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 16 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:11 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 3 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -FEBRUARY 1, 2005 - -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:21 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (05-047 - ) Proclamation declaring January 30, 2005 through April 4, 2005 as A Season for Nonviolence in the City of Alameda. Mayor Johnson read the Proclamation and presented it to Pat Dilks of the Children's Learning Center representing the Youth Collaborative. Ms. Dilks thanked the Council for their support. (05-048) - Update on the new main library project. The Project Manager submitted a timeline and provided an update on the project. Mayor Johnson inquired when the construction budget would be submitted, to which the Project Manager responded that the construction budget was set by the $17.4 million contract. Mayor Johnson inquired when the spending schedule would be provided, to which the Project Manager responded that a schedule would be provided this month. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the steel prices were locked in before the end of 2004, to which the Project Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the rebar subcontractor withdrew because of bankruptcy. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Johnson announced that the minutes [paragraph no. 05-049], and the Resolution Authorizing the Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission [paragraph no. 05-054] were removed from Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 2 | the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number . ] (05-049) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council meetings held on January 18, 2005. Mayor Johnson requested that the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting should be revised to reflect that she was not absent. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Special City Council Meeting and revised Regular City Council Meeting. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*05-050) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,627,942.61. (*05-051) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report for period ending December 31, 2004. Accepted. (*05-052) Recommendation to approve Agreement with Ameresco Half Moon Bay, LLC for the purchase of power from Landfill Gas Generation. Accepted. (*05-053) Resolution No. 13812, "Authorizing the Application to CalTrans for a Bicycle Transportation Account Grant for Improvements to the Bay Farm Island Bicycle Bridge Approach. Adopted. (05-054) Resolution No. 13813, "Authorizing the Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for a Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Grant for the Cross Alameda Trail Phase I." Adopted. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the purchase of the right-of- way for the linear park was part of the Alameda Belt Line property, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. The City Attorney stated that the Alameda Belt Line litigation Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 3 | involves the exercise of the right to purchase the entire Alameda Belt Line property, not just the 22-acre site. Mayor Johnson stated that the purchase of the right-of-way for the linear park was separate from the down zoned area [Measure D, 2000]. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the curb on Ralph Appezzato Memorial Parkway was under the City's jurisdiction, to which the Public Works Director responded the street from curb to curb is within the public right-of-way Councilmember deHaan inquired whether improvements have been made to the area, to which the Public Works Director responded that there were no improvements on the south side of Appezzato Memorial Parkway because the City only owns the area to the curb; the Alameda Belt Line property runs from the back of the curb to the fence line. ouncilmember deHaan moved adoption of the Resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*05-055) Resolution No. 13814, "Approving Submittal of a Revised Application, Incorporating a Flat Parking Lot and Budget Adjustments, to the Office of Library Construction Under the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000. Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS ( 05-056) - Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board's approval of Design Review, DR04-0101, to allow a 5,300 square foot new commercial building (veterinary hospital) to replace approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial buildings, with a parking lot expansion to 23 spaces; and adoption of related resolution. The property is located at 1410 Everett Street in the C-C Community Commercial and R-5 Hotel Residential Zoning Districts. Appellant: John Barni, Jr. Applicant : Park Centre Animal Hospital. The Supervising Planner provided a brief overview of the project. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether rezoning from R-5 to C-C would make the existing property conform to the General Plan designation, to which the Supervising Planner responded in th… | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 4 | 4 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 5 | receive notification live within 300 feet regardless of the Everett Street or Central Avenue address. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether someone would be unaware that Central Avenue was involved if they did not review the plans, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether use permits run with the current proprietor or with the property, to which the Supervising Planner responded that use permits run with the land; stated use permits do not change the zoning. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the notice is valid, to which the City Attorney responded that the notice complies with the requirements of the Municipal Code and the current practices of the Planning Department. Councilmember deHaan requested clarification on the dog walking practices. Mr. Busse stated that currently the dogs are walked on the existing bank property as well as in the neighborhood. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether dogs are boarded, to which Mr. Busse responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is design latitude on the Central Avenue side, to which Mr. Busse responded enhancements have been made; additional latticework is being added. Councilmember deHaan stated he was concerned with trees covering the sign. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether landscaping was one foot from the lot line and five feet from the edge of the sidewalk. Mr. Busse responded that there would be a five foot two inch landscape buffer from the existing sidewalk. Mayor Johnson stated that she supports the project Design Review is the only issue before the Council; good improvements have been made. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned about the notification. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the project should be re- noticed, and Design Review should be sent back to the Planning Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 6 | Board. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she would like to go on record as liking the design, especially the changes the architect has made ; she is concerned about the noticing issue. Mayor Johnson stated that she concurs with Vice Mayor Gilmore; not including the address on Central Avenue in the notice may have caused confusion; she feels badly for the business because of the project delay. Councilmember Daysog stated that speakers mentioned that the design does not fit the residential character of the neighborhood; arguments could be made that the design is an improvement over the existing structure; the project is a positive step. Councilmember deHaan moved that the matter be sent back to the Planning Board for proper notification. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmembers Matarrese, Gilmore, Daysog, and Mayor Johnson went on record that the only reason the matter was being sent back to the Planning Board was to allow proper notification. (05-057 - ) Public Hearing to consider Amendment to Zoning Map to rezone approximately 7,800 square feet (1/5 acre) at 1410 Everett Street, APN 070-170-15, from R-5 Hotel Residential to C-C Community Commercial; and (05-057A) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., from R-5 (General Residential Zoning District to C-C (Community Commercial Zoning District, for that Property Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett Street. Not introduced. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. Proponents (In favor of rezoning) : Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association; Steve Busse, Park Centre Animal Hospital. Opponents (Not in favor of rezoning) : John Barni, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 7 | Vice Mayor Gilmore moved that the matter be sent back to the Planning Board for proper notification. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson called a recess at 10:05 p.m. and reconvened the Regular City Council Meeting at 10:21 p.m. * Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to direct the City Manager to prepare an ordinance [paragraph no. 05-058] would be heard before the discussion regarding options for relocation assistance [paragraph no. 05-059]. (05-058 - ) Recommendation to direct the City Manager to prepare an ordinance establishing a Theatre Combining District in Chapter XXX, Development Regulations. Lars Hanson, Park Street Business Association (PSBA) , stated that PSBA supports establishment of the ordinance. Mayor Johnson announced that the following speakers are in favor but would not comment Pauline Kelley, Alameda Abigail Wade, Regency Antiques; Nick Petrulakis, Books Inc. ; Elizabeth Pinkerton, Dog Bone Alley; Gene Oh, Alameda Bicycle, Robb Ratto, PSBA. Councilmember deHaan moved to approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog inquired whether accepting the staff recommendation allows the Central Cinema to continue operating, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-059) Discussion regarding options for relocation assistance legislation and a temporary moratorium on all new construction, demolition and condominium conversion in the "West End Atlantic Corridor Area" (bounded by Webster Street, Main Street, Pacific Avenue and Ralph J. Appezzato Memorial Parkway). Proponents : Mosetta Rose London, Alameda; Donald Cummingham, Alameda ; Modessa Henderson, Harbor Island Tenant Association (HITA) ; Motoe Yamada, Alameda; Emily, Lin; Michael Wharton, Alameda Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 7 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 8 | Unified School District i Gerbrehiwot Tesfandrias, Alameda Michael John Torrey, Alameda. Samya Ahmed, HITA; David de la Torre, Alameda; Lorraine Lilley, HITA; Tom Matthews, Renewed Hope; Lynette Lee, Renewed Hope; Isolina Cadle, HITA; Michael Yoshii, Buena Vista United Methodist Church; Judge Richard Bartalini, Alameda; Arnold Fong, Alameda resident and RPO; Lily Lueng, Alameda. Neutral Dr. Mary Abu-saba, Alameda; Deborah James, Alameda; Craig Miott, Alameda. Opponents: Jack Sullivan, Alameda resident and Rental Property Owner (RPO) i Jun Saraspi, RPO; John Goerl, RPO; Shirley Green, Alameda resident and RPO; Paul Anders, Alameda resident and RPO; Merle Pagel, Alameda resident and RPO; Maewood Zarback, Alameda resident and RPO; Roger Armstrong, RPO; Rosemary McNally, Alameda resident and RPO; Angela McIntyre, Alameda Association of Realtors; Harry McMillan, RPO; Ann O'Rourke, Alameda resident and RPO; former Councilmember Hadi Monsef, Alameda; Chris Mazala, Mason Management Don Camara, Alameda resident and RPO; Lisa Fowler, Gallagher and Lindsey Eileen Walker, Alameda resident and President of Alameda Association of Realtors; Ann Bracci, Alameda; Dave Gallagher, RPO; Hanna Fry, Alameda resident and RPO; Mark Palmer, Alameda resident and RPO; Ellen Purdy, Harbor Bay Realty; Ed Murphy, Alameda resident and RPO; Arch Woodliff, Alameda resident and RPO; Suha Erdem, Alameda resident and RPO; Cynthia Ridenour, Alameda resident and RPO; former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda; Thomas Cooke, Bonanza Apartments; Carol Martino, Realty World Martino Associates; Kathy Lautz, Apartment Owners Association; Steve Edrington, Rental Housing Association of Northern Alameda County. (05-060) After speaker Cynthia Ridenour, Councilmember Matarrese moved that the Regular Meeting be continued past midnight. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Daysog stated that as a graduate student he worked on a project analyzing the impacts of rent control in Berkeley and Santa Monica; … | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 9 | other than an ordinance that speaks to short notice mass evictions and voluntary relocation assistance. Mayor Johnson requested staff to determine how local and State statutes could be put to better use; stated the maintenance and quality of life issues at the Harbor Island Apartments could have been handled better. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he has not met one person who has defended the 15 Asset Management Group's action; requested staff to review whether there is a hole in the condominium conversion ordinance and whether there is an attempt to circumvent the ordinance; the proposed ordinance does not address the impact of not providing a reasonable, fair amount of public notice for vacating the complex completely; the Alameda Unified School District is trying to close a gap of over a million dollars ; perhaps the 15 Asset Management Group should pay an impact fee; the Harbor Island Apartment issue will not be resolved soon; encouraged investment and improvement in the West End; stated process should include social impacts. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the goal should be preventing a Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again; the question is how to go about it; the City needs to work to enforce current laws the former residents suffered greatly; West End residents need to know that they are just as important as residents in other sections of the City; landlords have stated that the proposed ordinance will not work from their standpoint i challenged the landlords to work with the City and the residents and come up with a way of preventing the situation from happening again; stated steps need to be put in place to have it happen sooner rather than later. Councilmember deHaan stated that redeveloping the West End will cause displacement; a good social eye is needed for what is occurring the City knew that something was going astray; a wedge has been driven between the landlords and tenants; the size of the Harbor Island Apartments makes it difficult to manage; the property cannot afford to be ke… | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 10 | Gilmore's challenge to have property owners and residents work together and provide suggestions; no one in Alameda has not been offended by the actions of 15 Asset Management Group. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is looking for some type of quantifiable action in going forward; over the last year and a half, Council had knowledge of the crime situation around the complex; Housing Authority reports stated Section 8 units were being decertified because standards were not being met; requested the City Manager to compile indicators such as crime, Code Enforcement complaints, and Housing Authority Section 8 de- certification which would allow Council to set a policy on how to react should there be another large complex that is spinning in the same fashion as the Harbor Island Apartments situation. Mayor Johnson requested an inventory of ordinances that have not been strongly enforced to allow Council to set a policy on enforcement. Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to review the Harbor Island Apartments in relation to Alameda Municipal Code Section 13-11.3 Mayor Johnson requested an inventory of ordinances that apply to Alameda, whether State or local. Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to review how other cities have utilized the State ordinances and whether other cities have been effective. Mayor Johnson stated that it is important for the Council to set a policy utilizing existing ordinances. Councilmember Daysog requested feedback from staff on his draft voluntary relocation assistance. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that going through the process has raised public awarenessi a committee of tenant and landlord representatives should be formed to keep the momentum going and discuss the issues; landlords have been reactionary to tenants' ideas; landlords and tenants should work more cooperatively in developing ideas for preventing the situation from occurring again. Mayor Johnson requested that suggestions on the framework of the committee be brought back to Council at the next City Council meet… | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 11 | Counci lember Matarrese clarified that the motion was to direct staff to: 1) provide a compilation of indicators relating to crime, Code Enforcement, and Housing Authority Section 8 de-certification which would enable the Council to develop a policy on how to react, and 2) provide a framework for a committee which would include defining what happened at the Harbor Island Apartments and how to prevent the situation from happening again. Mayor Johnson stated Councilmember Daysog's voluntary relocation assistance draft should be included. Counci lmember Daysog stated the proposed committee could review his suggestion. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-061) Former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda, stated the City Attorney received a copy of the State law on rentals two years agoi noted Committees, except those she has chaired, often do not sunset on time; stated landlords would get together to respond to Councilmember Gilmore's challenge [to come up with a something to prevent a Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again] . (05-062) Judge Richard Bartalini, Alameda, thanked Councilmember Daysog for returning property he left in the Chambers at a previous meeting. (05-063) Steve Edrington, Rental Housing Association, stated that he could provide Council with copies of the rental housing laws. (05-064) Arch Woodliff, Alameda, noted that he chaired the committee which dealt with rent in 1974 and first founded the Rent Review Advisory Committee. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-065) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board. [Partial term expiring June 30, 2007] Mayor Johnson nominated Dennis Hanna for appointment to the SSHRB. (05-066) - ) Vice Mayor Gilmore request staff to provide information on the cost for filing an appeal; stated Mr. Barni indicated his Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 12 | Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 13 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -FEBRUARY 1, 2005 -6:45 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : ( 05-044) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Younger-Wunar, Inc. V. City of Alameda. (05-045) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case: Gallagher & Burke, Inc. V City of Alameda. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Younger-Wunar Inc. V. City of Alameda, the Council obtained briefing and instructions were given to Legal Counsel; and regarding Gallagher & Burke, Inc. V. City of Alameda, the Council obtained briefing and instructions were given to Legal Counsel. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING TUESDAY- - - -FEBRUARY 1, 2005- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 8:05 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners/Board Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA ITEMS JOINT ACTION: (05-046CC/05-005CIC) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Financial Report and approve mid-year budget adjustments. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated that the report shows the revenues and expenditures for the first six months of the Fiscal Year and recommended adjustments. The Finance Director stated the report provides a snapshot view; matters could get better or worse; the amended budget has a $4.8 million deficit; a report on closing the deficit would be presented at the February 15 City Council Meeting; 45% of the estimated revenues have been received; expenditures are at 43.5% of budget the estimated fund balance is based on estimated revenues and appropriations. Councilmember/Commissioner/Board Member Daysog inquired how much of the projected $13.4 million fund balance is designated, to which the Finance Director responded approximately $8.5 million. Councilmember/Commissioner/Board Member Matarrese inquired whether there would be a budget adjustment due to the 43.5% run rate. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded that a budget adjustment would be made that would equal the estimated overrun of $4.8 million. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the budget situation is a very serious problem. ouncilmember/Commissioner/Board Member Daysog moved acceptance of the staff recommendation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 15 | Councilmember/Commissioner/BoardMember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION ACTION: 05-006CIC) Resolution #05-133, "Approving and Authorizing Execution of an Assigment and Assumption Agreement and First Amendment to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement between MovieTECS, Inc. and the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda. (2305 Central Avenue, Video Maniacs) Adopted. Lars Hanson, President of the Park Street Business Association (PSBA), stated that PSBA supports the resolution; adoption of the resolution would be the first step toward restoring the historic Alameda theatre. Duane Watson encouraged building the parking structure. Debbie George, Alameda, urged adoption of the resolution. Robb Ratto, PSBA, thanked the Council for taking a historic step in moving forward with the parking structure, the restoration of the Alameda theatre, and the new theatre complex. Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Commissioner deHaan stated that the theatre project has been a long time coming. Chair Johnson stated that many people still do not believe that the theatre project is moving forward; affirmative steps need to be taken to let people know that the theatre is going to reopen. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the special meeting at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 2 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,16 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 16 | Agenda for meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 3 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,17 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 17 | MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL ALAMEDA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION MEETING TUESDAY - -FEBRUARY 1, 2005- -7:25 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Annual Meeting at 8:03 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Board Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (05 5-01) - Minutes of the Annual Alameda Public Improvement Corporation Meeting of February 3, 2004. Board Member Daysog moved approval of the minutes. Board Member Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Board Members Daysog, Gilmore, Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 4. Abstentions : Board Member deHaan - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Annual Meeting at 8:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Alameda Public Improvement Corporation The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Annual Meeting Alameda Public Improvement Corporation February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -FEBRUARY 15, 2005- -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 7:37 p.m. Councilmember deHaan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5. [Note: Mayor Johnson left the meeting at 9:02 p.m. to travel on City business. ] Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (05-072) Proclamation supporting the Navy League's efforts to designate the City of Alameda as an official "Coast Guard City. " Mayor Johnson read the proclamation and presented it to Hadi Monsef and Barbara Price representing the Alameda Council of the Navy League. Ms. Price presented a book on the history of the Coast Guard to the Mayor and City on behalf of Coast Guard Admiral Breckenridge. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar with a correction to the February 1, 2005 regular meeting minutes. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number . ] ( *05-073) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on February 1, 2005. Approved. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the February 1 regular meeting minutes adjourn time be corrected to indicate a.m. instead of p.m. ( *05-074) - Ratified bills in the amount of $2,200,868.59. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 2 | (*05-075) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the second calendar quarter of 2004. Accepted. ( *05-076) Resolution No. 13815, "Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2. " Adopted. (*05-077) Resolution No. 13816, "Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove) . Adopted. (*05-078) Resolution No. 13817, "Amending the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Salary Schedule by Establishing a Salary Range for the Position of Inventory Control Clerk. " Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (05-079) Resolution No. 13818, "Appointing Dennis J. Hanna as a Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Mr. Hanna with a Certificate of Appointment. (05 -080 - ) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission from Five to Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2-9.1 (Commission Created; Composition), 2-9.2 (Membership; Appointment; Removal) and 2-9.3 (Voting) of Section 2-9 (City Golf Commission). Introduced. Mayor Johnson stated that she suggested the membership increase because there is a lot of upcoming activity at the golf course, including the new clubhouse; having two more members would help with the workload; the Golf Commission Chair supports the idea. The Interim City Manager stated the golf course has become a large operation; the golf budget is over $5 million; there will be major changes at the golf course that require financial overview in the next few years. Councilmember deHaan stated the Transportation Commission was lowered from nine to seven members; the Recreation and Park Commission has five members; inquired whether the membership of the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 3 | Recreation and Park Commission should be reviewed. Mayor Johnson stated the matter could be reviewed; commissions are established by ordinance and Council has flexibility to make changes boards established by Charter would be difficult to change. Councilmember deHaan stated having seven members provides flexibility to bring people with different expertise aboard. Mayor Johnson concurred the matter should be reviewed. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-081) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $2,110,000, including contingencies to Ghilotti Brothers, Inc. for Park Street Streetscape and Town Center Project, Phase I, No. P. W. 10-02-13, and authorize the allocation of additional funds from the Merged Areas Bond Issuance of 2003. Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA). stated the new streetlights will look like 1927 streetlights on the outside, but are state-of-the-art inside; hopefully, a later phase to complete Alameda Avenue will happen quickly; urged Council to approve the Contract. Mayor Johnson stated that she is pleased with how well the Webster Street Streetscape project is going; that she has not received any complaints. Councilmember deHaan stated the City decided to replace the entire sidewalk on Webster Street; inquired how the decision was made regarding Park Street. The Public Works Director responded the entire sidewalk on Park Street is not being replaced due to cost and basements extending into the public right of way; stated replacing the Park Street sidewalks would require roofs to be built above basements, which would be very expensive; PSBA agrees with the approach. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 4 | money by the end of March; the City can deposit the money and begin earning interest to mitigate the reduction. Councilmember Matarrese stated the City would sell bonds inquired how the liability would be covered. The Interim City Manager responded there would be no liability to Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 5 | the City because the bondholders would demand insurance to cover any State default; Covenants and Conditions of the bond will state the bondholders recourse is not to any cities involved, but to the State. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a default on the bonds would have no impact on the cities, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Gilmore congratulated staff for the creative solution to deal with the budget deficit for the current year and next year. Mayor Johnson noted that Assemblywoman Chan thought the idea was very interesting and a good strategy. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( (05-083) Recommendation to accept budget adjustments to revenue and appropriations. The Interim City Manager gave an overview of the budget adjustments. Mayor Johnson inquired why there is a cost to be part of the Alameda County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system. The Interim City Manager responded the cost is for providing emergency medical coordination. The Deputy Fire Chief stated the County provides quality assurance overview; every city in the County pays a fee to the County EMS, which is the medical authority responsible for administering licenses, classes, and protocol the fee is for overhead and quality assurance. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City reviews the County EMS budget, to which the Deputy Fire Chief responded the City receives a copy of the budget. Mayor Johnson inquired whether every city pays $500,000, to which the Interim City Manager responded the fee charged is per parcel. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City has to pay for training, to which the Deputy Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 6 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether the County sets policy. The Deputy Fire Chief responded in the affirmative; stated the County reviews compliance with protocols and licensing. Mayor Johnson stated the City should review the County's budget to determine why it is so expensive to be part of the system. The Interim City Manager stated staff could provide a report with more detailed information and obtain a copy of the budget. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City provides more assistance in mutual aid outside Alameda or whether Alameda receives more mutual aid assistance from outside agencies. The Deputy Fire Chief responded the County requires the City to enter into a mutual aid Contract to have American Medical Response (AMR) provide backup AMR comes into town to backup Alameda and Alameda provides backup for AMR; the amount of assistance provided and received is probably about even; yesterday, paramedics were in Oakland nine times because the trauma center was on bypass; often times it goes the other way; if paramedics are at a fire scene, AMR takes all medical calls; noted when Alameda was ramping up the Advanced Life Support (ALS) system, the City was receiving money back from the County contract. Mayor Johnson stated the amount that the City can charge for ambulance service is set by the County contract the City should charge as much as insurance companies pay, which is often higher than the cap set by the County the City should review the rates charged for ambulance services and request the flexibility to charge more to recover service costs from users. The Deputy Fire Chief stated that the County sets the maximum charge for transport and equipment used; the City is allowed to charge a little more since Alameda is unique and citizens do not pay a paramedic assessment; however, historically the City has not charged more and only charges a prevailing rate. The Interim City Manager continued reviewing budget adjustments. In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry whether an increased permit fee could be charg… | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 7 | Counci lmember Daysog inquired whether neighborhood park directors would remain, to which the Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative. The Interim City Manager completed his review; stated the total reduction in department budgets is $2,770,363; added to reductions in non-departmental areas, the total reduction is $6,295,983 the budget expenditure cuts and decreased revenues have no impact on the General Fund reserves for the fiscal year. Mayor Johnson stated there was a $1.2 million deficit in December; inquired how the deficit has reached $4.8 million. The Finance Director responded the budget adopted July 20 had expenditures exceeding revenues by $1.6 million; revenues decreased another $2 million because the 911 fee and Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) Return on Investment (ROI) were not adopted by the Council, resulting in a $3.2 million deficit; Council actions to appropriate funds for the City Manager recruitment, Interim City Manager, Chinatown agreement, and other activities had an approximately $256,000 impact. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether hiring additional Firefighters would have an impact on overtime. The Interim City Manager responded that the five Firefighters would start the academy March 15; there would be a cost of $322,000 in salaries for the five Firefighters in the academyi there will not be a net benefit for the current fiscal year. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there would be an impact in future years, to which the Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired the amount of the reserve that was required to be set aside. The Interim City Manager responded there is a $2,453,743 set aside for accrued vacation and $1,444,000 for post employment health; the total accrued liability is about $3.5 million of the reserves. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the general reserves are about $10 million. The Interim City Manager responded that after removing the $3.5 million required in set aside and removing loans to other funds, the amount remai… | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 8 | reserves could be used in 2 years; the federal and State governments have deficits other cities are making staff reductions, doing furloughs and closing City Hall one day per month; Alameda's financial problems are not unique the problem is due to the State taking property taxes and the large increase in the PERS contribution for retirements; since CalPERS investments have not done well in the last few years, contributions have to be raised significantly. Kevin Kennedy, City Treasurer, stated significant cuts are being made without cutting services that citizens find vital; there has been a dramatic shift in the State's economy ; the budget has to be brought in line with economic realities; the City might face equally or more difficult choices in the next budget the City needs to focus on core services; the ten-year budget forecast will be integral in forming the next budget the reserves do not allow the City to postpone dealing with the situation. Councilmember deHaan stated Department Heads would have to implement budget changes the budget would evolve over the next four or five years; the City needs to be prepared. Councilmember Matarrese stated additional police dispatchers were needed; inquired whether the positions are being filled to prevent overtime and short staffing issues. The Interim City Manager responded that he authorized filling two positions in dispatch; one or two more people might be hired, but he is holding off until he is convinced additional staff is absolutely required. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the open positions in police and fire constitute a reduction in public safety out in the streets. The Interim City Manager responded that positions cannot be reduced in a department without recognizing that there will be an impact; both the Fire Chief and Police Chief have made a concerted effort to have the least amount of impact to the citizens, such as a delay in processing abandoned vehicles; when the City does not backfill following officer promotions, there will be an impact. Co… | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 9 | 9 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 10 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is reluctant that the City has to take these stepsi requested that staff monitor service levels: if damage is being done and appropriations are needed, information should be brought to Council before the situation is an emergency the City is starting to nick away at the meat of its services; that he does not differentiate between hard and soft priorities; Council has laid out priorities the park and library services are intangibles that prevent the need for additional police officers in some cases; the situation should be monitored to ensure the City is not putting itself into an unrecoverable hole. Acting Mayor Gilmore complimented staff for the clarity and brevity of the report; commended the Alameda Journal for top coverage of the issue; stated citizens need to be aware; Council is making the best decision given the resources available; the City needs to continue to get out the word because sooner or later the average citizen will be impacted. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the Council consider direction to review terminating the police boat water services; stated upwards of 3,500 berths are occupied by boats that pay property taxes; that he assumes the fire boat is in jeopardy as well; that he would like to have options to help find an alternative funding source, whether it be a surcharge per slip or some other service levy that can be presented to the public; the matter should be brought back to the Council. Councilmember Daysog requested a report on the ARRA $2.5 million budget for public safety; stated that he understands the one-time expenditure will end June 30; in addition to the $1. 4 million hole in the City's budget, there will be a $2.5 million hole in the ARRA budget next year; that he understands the Interim City Manager is reviewing alternatives. The Interim City Manager stated staff is very concerned about the ARRA budget; that he has discussed the matter with the Development Services Director; steps are being taken to pare down the ARRA budget as m… | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 11 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-084) - Michael John Torrey, Alameda, noted a Calgrant workshop would be held February 22 and a community meeting would be held February 23 to discuss extraordinary maintenance projects around the West End. (05-085) Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, encouraged residents and workers in Alameda to shop in Alameda stated sales tax revenues need to increase. (05-086) Reginald James, West Alameda Teen Club, invited everyone to attend the West Alameda Teen Club black history basketball event February 24 from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. at Chipman Middle School. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-087) Acting Mayor Gilmore stated an Association of Bay Area Governments meeting on April 28 in San Francisco is about Casinos on the Bay Area Landscape; suggested that a Councilmember attend the meeting or staff attend, if a Councilmember cannot, to listen to the discussion. (05-088 ) Councilmember Daysog stated the last representative to the League of California Cities was Barbara Kerr; that he has been involved in the East Bay Division employer subcommittee; that he would be willing to be the City's representative. Acting Mayor Gilmore stated the matter would have to be placed on a future agenda. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Acting Mayor Gilmore adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 12 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -FEBRUARY 15, 2005- -6:10 P.M. Acting Mayor/Chair Gilmore convened the Special Joint Meeting at 6:20 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmember/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, and Acting Mayor/Chair Gilmore - 4. Absent : Mayor/Chair Johnson - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (05-070CC/05-007CIC Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Name of cases Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, and City of Alameda V. Alameda Belt Line. Prior to the Regular City Council Meeting, Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that a briefing was given by the City Attorney's office. Adjournment There being no further business, Acting Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 13 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -FEBRUARY 15, 2005- -6:30 P.M. Acting Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese and Acting Mayor Gilmore - 4. Absent : Mayor Johnson - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-071) Conference with Labor Negotiator; Agency Negotiators: Human Resources Director and Craig Jory Employee Organizations: Management and Confidential Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Police Association Non- Sworn. Prior to the Regular City Council Meeting, Mayor Johnson announced that the Council obtained a briefing and instructions were given to Labor Negotiators. Adjournment There being no further business, Acting Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -MARCH 1, 2005- -7:30 P. .M. Mayor Johnson convened the meeting at 8:08 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES (05-091) - Mayor Johnson announced that the Resolution Approving Parcel Map 8574 [paragraph no. 05-096] would be addressed at a later date. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar, excluding the Resolution Approving Parcel Map 8574 [paragraph no. 05-096]. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number . ] ( *05-092) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Community Improvement Commission (CIC) and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting held on February 1, 2005; and the Special Joint City Council and CIC Meeting, the Special City Council Meeting and the Regular City Council Meeting held on February 15, 2005. Approved. ( *05-093) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,312,454.99. (*05-094) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the third calendar quarter of 2004. Accepted. ( *05-095) Recommendatior to authorize the Mayor, City Manager and/or designee to send letters opposing the proposed elimination of the Community Development Block Grant Program and related Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 1, 2005 1 | CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-01 | 2 | federal programs in the Administration's 2006 budget. Accepted. (05-096) Adoption of Resolution Approving Parcel Map No. 8574 for a Sixteen Lot Subdivision at Harbor Bay Business Park. Not heard. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (05-097) - Resolution No. 13820, "Commending Recreation and Park Director Suzanne Ota for Her Contributions to the City of Alameda. Adopted. Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the Resolution. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson read the Resolution and presented it to Suzanne Ota; stated that Ms. Ota has done an outstanding job. The Interim City Manager presented Ms. Ota with flowers. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she started her service to the City working with the Recreation and Park Department she always appreciated Ms. Ota's enthusiasm, energy and "can do" spirit. Councilmember Daysog stated that Ms. Ota brings so much joy to so many parts of the community. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the City would miss Ms. Ota; as a citizen as well as a Councilmember, he appreciates the great job that Ms. Ota has done. Councilmember deHaan stated that Ms. Ota should feel very comfortable in her accomplishments. (05-098) Public Hearing to consider rezoning ZA 05-0001/R 05-0001 Zoning Text Amendment/Reclassification to add a Theater Overlay District and rezoning certain properties to include the Theater Overlay Districti and (05-098A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 30-2 (Definitions) ; Amending Subsection 30-3.2 (Combining Districts) ; Adding a New Subsection 30-4.22 (T- Theater Combining District) ; and Repealing Subsection 30-6.23(2) (b) of Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) and Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain Properties Within the City of Alameda to Include the Theater Combining District. Continued to March 15, 2005. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 1, 2005 2 | CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-01 | 3 | (05-099) Establishment of a Task Force that will propose strategies to prevent future mass evictions from rental housing complexes in the City of Alameda. The Interim City Manager outlined the suggested structure and mission of the Task Force; stated the Task Force would meet on a regular basis and report back to the Council within 90 days. Carol Martino, Alameda, stated that she would like to serve on the Task Force. Steven Edrington, Rental Housing Association, stated that the matter should not overly politicized to ensure progress is made and there is a balanced committee. Kathy Lautz, Apartment Owners Association, volunteered to serve on the Task Force. Lorraine Lilley, Harbor Island Tenants Association, stated that new laws are necessary to protect tenants; suggested that the committee have two Harbor Island Tenant Association representatives and two ar-large tenants. Councilmember deHaan inquired how the nominations would be made. Mayor Johnson responded that she would like to receive input from Council; that Council should submit names for potential Task Force members. Councilmember Daysog stated there should be a specific period of time for application submittals. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Task Force would be an informal committee, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. (05-100) Ordinance NO. 2936, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission from Five to Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2-9.1 (Commission Created Composition), 2-9.2 (Membership Appointment ; Removal) and 2-9.3 (Voting) of Section 2-9 (City Golf Commission) Finally passed. Councilmember deHaan moved final passage of the ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 1, 2005 3 | CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );