pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2012-06-06 and page = 9
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2012-06-06 | 9 | Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the funds could be used for the additional work if a commercial opportunity creates land sale proceeds, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative. In response to Councilmember Johnson's inquiry about the impact on the value, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the amount is not known at this point. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the residential area would not be marketed, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative. In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry about impacts of not completing the residential work, the City Manager stated staff was betting that having all the residential work done would draw people in because the process would be so streamlined; however, not completing the work would allow more flexibility. Councilmember deHaan inquired how the City would balance interest in pads, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the City would hold the cards as the property owner. In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry, Mayor Gilmore stated the master infrastructure work would be complete; further stated previous attempts have shown developers want to develop housing at Alameda Point, due to the location and fantastic views; getting the commercial aspect to work is harder; the commercial development would also create jobs. Councilmember Tam stated both options include the master infrastructure plan which is critical to understanding cost exposure; inquired whether the EIR is required as part of the Oakland Chinatown Settlement Agreement. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative; stated the Settlement Agreement requires a project level EIR before construction can start; programmatic level EIRs have been performed. Councilmember Johnson stated residential is the one part that can be removed; going forward with the commercial is focusing on job creation; doing the residential part would give the City more control. Speak… | CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf |
CivilServiceBoard/2012-06-06.pdf,9 | CivilServiceBoard | 2012-06-06 | 9 | that Mr. Lillard could call these people and say he wants them to rate certain people down so they are not given a promotional opportunity, when the evaluators do not even know who the authors are, it is hard to say. Mr. Low responded the interviews were also conducted by subject matter experts who with the exception of one, Mr. Patrick Russi, did not have any intimate knowledge of the applicants. The interview panelists again were Assistant City Manager Lisa Goldman, Recreation Supervisor Patrick Russi, and Amy Wooldridge. At this point, the City does not believe that there is a basis for an appeal of the Recreation Services Specialist recruitment results or subsequent appointments. All three appellants before the Board applied for the promotion, participated in the selection process, and all three achieved a rank on the eligible list. The City Manager, who is the appointing authority, approved the appointments of the top three ranking candidates who are considered to be the best qualified based on their relative performance through the selection process which was how people responded to the supplemental questions and how they responded to the questions in the structured oral interview process. All of the applicants answered the same supplemental questions and all of the applicants answered the same structured oral interview questions. The City recommends that the Civil Service Board uphold the recruitment and selection process as well as the subsequent appointments. Mr. Peterson asked what percentage was based on written and what percentage on the oral exam. Mr. Low stated that scores were based on 40% supplemental questionnaire and 60% on oral. Mr. Riddle stated that it is up to the Board to determine if they want questions from the public to be answered. Mr. Peterson stated that the Board said the public could ask questions. President Peeler stated the Board did say they would allow questions. Don Peterson, Alameda resident and former president of Local 595 IBEW, stated that in the old days, 20-30 years ago, … | CivilServiceBoard/2012-06-06.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );