pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2012-06-06 and page = 3
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2012-06-06 | 3 | Council every three years. In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry about what established the requirement, Mark Allen, ACLPPP, stated the original Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) required approval every year, which was changed to 3 years in 2006. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Council could take said action tonight. The City Attorney responded the title indicates the agreement is for three years. The Development Manager stated that the proposed change could be brought back. Councilmember Tam stated the agreement has been renewed ten times; inquired about the related grant. The Development Manager responded the grant is separate and is through Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Councilmember Tam inquired whether the City Council would continue its role even though the Housing Authority is now separate, to which the Development Manager responded in the affirmative. The City Attorney inquired whether the agreement should continue indefinitely when the matter is brought back, to which Councilmember Johnson responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation; noted Council would consider continuing indefinitely when staff brings the matter back. Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*12-279) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for Urban Forest Maintenance Services (Citywide), No. P.W. 06-11-16. Accepted. (*12-280) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for Sewer Point Repairs and Asphalt Concrete Replacement within the City of Alameda, No. P.W. 05-12-09. Accepted. (*12-281) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for Bids for Vegetation Management, Debris Management, and Water Quality Monitoring for the South Shore Lagoons, No. P.W. 05-12-11. Accepted. (*12-282) Recommendation to Accept Work of Weber Tractor Service for Repair of Portland Cement Concrete. Accepted. (*12-283) Resolution No. 14678, "Approving and Amending Part Ti… | CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf |
CivilServiceBoard/2012-06-06.pdf,3 | CivilServiceBoard | 2012-06-06 | 3 | their discretion if they want additional time to look at documents. The Board may want additional information before it is said and done as well. It is up to the Board's discretion. Mr. Gossman stated that the Union has no objection to moving forward. Vice President Horikoshi moved that the meeting/hearing continue; Member Batchelor seconded the motion which passed by a 5-0 vote. President Peeler invited the appellants to speak. Mr. Gossman stated that he would provide an opening statement and then he has three appellants that would like to give a three minute speech and then we could proceed from there. Mr. Riddle agreed they would have a full 10 minutes between all of them to begin. Mr. Gossman provided a six-page document/report (with attachments) to the Civil Service Board. Mr. Gossman stated that he was at the meeting today to represent three appellants who were former employees of the City of Alameda and that they have been program park coordinators for 10 to 11 years working for the City. In March 2012, they were informed that the City was planning to eliminate their positions. At that time there were four positions occupied. They were advised that the Alameda Recreation and Park Department (ARPD) would be eliminating the Park Program Coordinator to create a new classification of Recreational Program Specialist and that one of the four would be laid off because there would be four positions cut down to three. Mr. Gossman also stated that the resolution was taken to City Council and it was stated that this was going to save $400,000 for the City by going to this new classification. In essence, that is a false smoke screen because these employees were already being paid out of the Athletic Trust Fund and not paid out of the General Fund. The fact that they were changing to a new position had nothing to do with the $400,000. But, when we went to a union meeting, a meet and confer, the reason for the new classification was to save $400,000. Mr. Gossman continued that prior to the testing, two managers who work… | CivilServiceBoard/2012-06-06.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );