pages
2 rows where "date" is on date 2012-06-06 and page = 10
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2012-06-06 | 10 | encouraged clean types of industry in the inner harbor area. Councilmember Johnson stated that her preference remains proceeding with Option 1, which has a lot of advantages; other ways have not been successful. Councilmember Tam stated that her preference is Option 2; the master infrastructure plan would minimize fragmentation; a project level EIR is needed, would include housing, is required by the Settlement Agreement and deals with integration; finding residential should not be hard when the market is conducive. In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry about the amount of the existing bond, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the bond was $13 million; the debt is $350,000 per year. Councilmember deHaan stated that he supports Option 1; the entitlement process takes a long time and the City has missed market opportunities; not going forward in a timely manner would not put the City in a good position. Councilmember Johnson stated spending $3 million more is very small for such a large project; inquired about proceeding on a cash basis. The City Manager responded a staff report attachment outlines moving forward without bonding. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated Exhibit 4 shows the fund balance would drop to $2.6 million at the end of Fiscal Year 2012-13 and $1.17 million at the end of Fiscal Year 2013-14; proceeding on a cash basis would draw down on the fund balance. Councilmember Johnson stated the City cannot keep up with deferred maintenance; the Base continues to deteriorate, which will accelerate as time passes; the extra $3 million needs to be spent to try to be ready to go when the economy turns around. Mayor Gilmore stated that she objects to going forward with the bonds; she responds in the opposite to crumbling infrastructure concerns; shovels will not be in the ground for several years; questioned what would happen if telephone or sewer lines have an issue during said time and where the City would come up with funds for repairs. Councilmember Johnson expressed c… | CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf |
CivilServiceBoard/2012-06-06.pdf,10 | CivilServiceBoard | 2012-06-06 | 10 | the people that were reading the applications could figure out who they were by not being able to answer the questions. There were certain people who did not have aquatic experience or senior experience and you would have to leave it blank because they could not answer it. Ms. Blumkin stated that for Mr. Low to state that was unbiased because there were no names, Dale Lillard informed those people whose those papers were and they could figure it out themselves. Ms. Blumkin is almost 100% certain that if you gave her the other person's name from Hayward, they (appellants) would also know who that person is because the recreation community is very close and all work together. This was an unfair process, totally unfair by Human Resources and the outgoing ARPD Director Dale Lillard. He is no longer working here, but if he was brought into this room today you (the Board) would be totally shocked. Ed Tsang, Alameda resident, retired from Alameda County Superior Court and father of appellant Marcia Tsang, asked what is the racial makeup of the new Recreation Services Specialists and what the racial makeup of Recreation Program Coordinators are. Ms. Blumkin stated the ones that were hired are all white. The ones laid off were two Asians and a Hispanic. Sandi Bertero, Alameda resident and former employee (retired) with the City of Alameda- currently part-time, stated that she loves working for the City and working in ARPD. She really feels that this was an unfair process. She worked with the union for many years and worked to get the union in the City. Most of the time when they have to do budget cuts, they usually do layoffs and most of the time it has been by seniority. This was not by seniority. They decided to reorganize the Department which is fine, but she wanted the Board to know that in the past it had always been by seniority. Because it was a promotional thing, her personal opinion is that anybody that qualified in the specific area. She does feel that there is possibly one person that may not have been qualifie… | CivilServiceBoard/2012-06-06.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );