pages
37 rows where page = 31
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body
date (date) 37 ✖
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-12-18 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2022-05-03 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 31 | TUESDAY- - -MAY 17, 2005- - -7:25 P.I M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint meeting at 7:35 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner/Board Member deHaan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : louncilmembers / Commissioners / Board Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-226CC/05-024CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting of May 3, 2005. Approved. (05-025CIC) Recommendation to approve an Amended Contract with Michael Stanton Architecture (MSA) by increasing the Contract amount an additional $40,000 for design review services for the proposed Civic Center Parking Garage Project. Accepted. ( 05-026CIC) Recommendation to receive and file revised Alameda West Strategic Retail Implementation recommendations. Received and filed. AGENDA ITEMS ( 05-027CIC) Recommendation to approve a First Amendment to an Acquisition Agreement by which the Community Improvement Commission acquired an Affordable Housing Covenant from the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority for thirty units of very low income housing at the Bachelor Officers' Quarters located within the Alameda Point Improvement Project. Commissioner/Board Member deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 31 | the establishment of seventeen movie theaters in town. (05-370) David Kirwin, Alameda, expressed concern about the megaplex theatre and parking structure project and funding; questioned whether there would be a $1,000 parcel tax; stated parking lots adjacent to businesses are sufficient; there is a need for increased public awareness regarding the project. Mayor Johnson responded there is not a parcel tax; requested staff to inform Mr. Kirwin where he should go for information. The Acting City Manager stated Mr. Kirwin, and others, could meet with staff in the City Manager's Office or Development Services Department. Mayor Johnson stated information could also be mailed or e-mailed, if preferred. (05-371) Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, stated people opposed to the [theater and parking structure) project have been providing misinformation; stated PSBA would have opposed the project if a $1,000 parcel tax were involved; noted the Downtown Vision plan from May, 2000 indicated that informal talks about a mutli-screen - theater were underway COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-372) - Councilmember deHaan stated that he visited the Bayport site; the transit shelter on Tinker Avenue is less than adequate; the size of the sidewalks at Bayport are extremely narrow, do not match other sidewalks in Alameda, and are not pedestrian friendly; said matters should be considered when other developments are built. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 11:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 31 July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 31 | and Development Agreement Amendment and a new Disposition and Development Agreement to replace 1,300,000 square feet of approved, but not yet constructed, office and research and development uses with 400,000 square feet of a Health Club and up to 300 residential units in the Catellus Mixed Use Development. Continued to November 21, 2006. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lana Stoker, Acting City Clerk Acting Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 2 Community Improvement Commission October 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 31 | Mr. Marshall stated said development was Pacific Commons. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan stated some of the Planning Board members visited the site and expressed a deep concern about project direction; inquired whether Council and the CIC could be assured that the same direction would not be taken. Mr. Marshall responded the nature of the project dictates tenant quality; stated 50,000 square feet of retail would be at the waterfront portion of the project, which leaves 250,000 square feet for core retail; big footprint buildings would be limited; the strategy would be followed. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog stated the nature of the project is pedestrian-oriented and well designed, which results in a certain elf-selection; work is still required to get the type of desired tenants. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that she appreciates Catellus's hard work to nail down Miracle League commitments. (06-599A CC) Resolution No. 14047, "Certifying the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Revised Catellus Mixed Use Development (State Clearinghouse #2006012091) . " Adopted. Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599B CC) Resolution No. 14048, "Making Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Making Findings Concerning Alternatives, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project (State Clearinghouse #2006012091. Adopted. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution incorporating amendments made prior to the meeting. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599C CC) Resolution No. 14049, "Approving General Plan Amendment, GPA-06-01: General Plan Amendments to: (A) Amend the Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Counc… | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 31 | also the first African American Councilmember on the Oakland City Council ; extended condolences to the entire Gilmore family; adjourned the meeting in a moment of silence for the loss of former President Gerald Ford and Carter Gilmore. Respectfully submitted, Lana Stoker Acting City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 31 January 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 31 | Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the golf course had more of a shortfall than was anticipated; inquired how much is left in the golf course fund, to which the Finance Director responded $1.9 million. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the golf course fund is burning through approximately $60,000 per month. louncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated the $15.5 million [reserve] is pretty well obligated; he believes that staff has the skills in getting requirements in order; having an outside review process would be a shame; actions have to be weighed; AP&T and the golf course are other concerns. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether a 1.5% reduction is aggressive enough for the next six or seven months. The City Manager/Executive Director responded the 1.5% reduction is a beginning; stated the matter will be monitored; she believes that the reduction fits at this point; direction can be changed if necessary. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated Council needs to consider how cuts are made. The City Manager/Executive Director stated the matter would be brought back to Council mid year. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the first quarter financial report and requested recommended appropriations. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 11:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 17 and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Commission December 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 31 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 5:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 31 February 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 31 | The Planning Services Manager responded possibly; stated the initiative is a community plan; community plans differ under the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) and call for a single EIR upfront i all future phases can rely on the first EIR. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated have mitigation be in conflict with the language of the initiative would be possible; a dispute could occur on how to resolve the issue. The Planning Services Manager stated the Disposition and Development Agreement could be used to resolve the conflict. Councilmember/Board Member Matarrese stated a draft would be presented in August; the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) ends in July; inquired what would happen if the City does not finish and the ENA terminates. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded the developer could stop at any point. Councilmember/Board Member Tam inquired whether Environmental Science Associates understands the issue, to which the Planning Services Manager responded definitely. Speaker Helen Sause, Home Ownership Makes Economic Sense (Homes) . Vice Mayor/Board Member deHaan stated the EIR could have been kicked off eight months ago and would have been good business. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated Oakland Chinatown and the City have an agreement that the City and developer would move forward with an EIR at the time the initiative qualified. Vice Mayor/Board Member deHaan stated a specific plan has not been approved; the ballot initiative was surprising. Councilmember/Board Member Tam stated the plan took two years of public meetings to develop. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the EIR would be consistent with the established timeline, to which the Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded in the affirmative. ADJOURNMENT (09-425 CC/ARRA/09-47 CIC) There being no further business Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission October 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 31 | Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commission deHaan inquired whether an executive summary would be included. Mr. Faye responded that he is not sure whether an executive summary is required but would be happy to provide one. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated an update could be provided under City Manager Communications. The Interim City Manager/Interim Executive Director responded information would be provided at the April 6 Council Meeting. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the document would be public when submitted on March 22nd The Interim City Manager/Interim Executive Director requested that Mr. Faye introduce new team members. Mr. Faye stated Robert Hertzberg has joined SunCal and will provide an additional set of eyes; that he [Mr. Faye] is a partner and will be at every hearing; that he withdraws the request for the 60-day tolling period; a project would be submitted by the deadline; stated SunCal would lift confidentiality requirements in the ENA with exceptions. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 2:54 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 6 Community Improvement Commission March 16, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 31 | Vice Mayor/Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether Mr. Faye is referring to the flood plane, which was identified in the Preliminary Development Concept. Mr. Faye stated there were a number of physical changes to the real property and there continue to be a number of changes to the condition of the real property; new information continues to come forward which affects costs; cost affects the need for revenue; costs and revenue are what derive project profit and internal rate of return. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether SunCal would release information regarding infrastructure, public amenities and the cap, which SunCal documents ran up to $700 million. Mr. Faye responded all information would be released; stated the cost cap was removed two months before the election. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese noted even though SunCal lifted the cap two months before, the cap was in the initiative; if it had passed, the initiative would have been the law of the land. (10-182 CC/ARRA/10-22 CIC) Election Costs and Request for Reimbursement The Interim City Manager/Executive Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether half of the Interim City Manager/Executive Director's salary has been paid by SunCal, to which the Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded that she does not charge anything to SunCal. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese requested future clarification of the matter; stated the matter should be sorted out and posted. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the actual draws need to be posted. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated SunCal needs to understand what they are paying for. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated that she is willing to disclose everything but the City cannot go as fast as SunCal; continued the presentation. Mr. Faye stated that he is not disputing the budget; the Deputy City Manager - Development Services indicated that the City Attorney/Legal … | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 31 | Adjournment There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:23 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 31 | on whether binding interest arbitration is a mandatory, permissive subject of bargaining; both the Public Employment Relations Board and District Court of Appeal found interest arbitration is a permissive, non-mandatory subject of bargaining and expressly held that meeting and conferring with the union first is not necessary prior to putting the matter on the ballot. The City Clerk restated Councilmember Tam's motion: to move approval to reconstitute the Charter Subcommittee in preparation for the November 2011 election. Councilmember Tam stated that her motion includes beginning discussion in 2011. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there is a March election next year. The City Clerk responded elections are held in March in odd numbered years and in June and November every year. Councilmember Matarrese stated the three proposed amendments are critical and need to be put before the public because of serious budget implications and good government. Councilmember Tam stated that her motion remains the same; in all fairness to the proposed fire fighter initiative, it should be juxtaposed against each other and should not separately preempt the measure. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the matter would not be discussed until November. Councilmember Tam stated that her motion is to have discussions starting in 2011 in preparation for the November 2011 election and to reconstitute the Council Charter Subcommittee because the Subcommittee might change after the November 2010 election. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Subcommittee could start working on the matter before January, 2011; stated the start time should be flexible so that the current Council Subcommittee could start working on the matter sooner. Councilmember Tam stated under the Mayor's advisement, the Subcommittee would have the option to work on the matter sooner rather than later. Mayor Johnson stated the Subcommittee should start earlier because more cleanup language might be needed. Councilmember Gilmore stated the same process should be… | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 31 | The Community Development Director stated Council will have an opportunity to review the components of the plan. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated there has to be some evidence that substantial work is going to occur; inquired whether staff does not mean every capital plan would be approved by Council. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated Council would approve the program requirements; provided examples; stated the number of no cause evictions allowed in one year could have a cap to prevent mass evictions; the ordinance includes a sliding scale; concern has been raised about staff's proposed 50% cap; inquired whether the cap should be changed to 25%. Councilmember Daysog responded definitely. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired in the case of mass evictions, would landlords be able to raise rents not at all or by the allowable cap, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City is trying to prevent clearing out buildings unless something such as soft story work has to be done. The Community Development Director stated tenants could be temporarily relocated while work is completed. The City Attorney inquired whether or not allowing a rent increase after major capital improvements allows for a fair return on investment. The Assistant City Attorney responded the capital plan would allow the housing provider to recover costs over a period of time. The City Attorney clarified there could be a rent increase. Councilmember Oddie stated there could be an increase in the case of capital improvements, which would be an exception. The Community Development Director clarified no fault evictions are being addressed, not just cause evictions, which include capital improvements; stated the concern is landlords might find mass evictions more streamlined or cheaper than going through a capital improvement plan. Mayor Spencer noted tenants will have difficulty relocating while vacancy rates are very low; inquired whether Councilmem… | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-02 | 31 | CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (16-057) The Interim City Manager stated the City of Alameda has an advertisement in the San Francisco Examiner, Big Game Guide; staff would like to organize a driving tour of the northern waterfront. Mayor Spencer stated there were no objections. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (16-058) Consider Directing the City Manager to Prepare Analysis and Recommendations Regarding Reviving the Airport Operations Committee. (Councilmembers Daysog and Oddie). Councilmember Daysog stated the impact of the altered flight plan are a concern to residents; Alameda needs its own entity to address airport issues. Councilmember Oddie stated it would be a short term Committee; he would like to make sure Alameda has a say in this issue. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City pays a Federal lobbyist in Washington, D.C.; inquired what could be done to lobby the Federal Government. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated he would like an analysis and recommendation to reinstate the Committee. Councilmember Daysog stated the City could work with the lobbyists and others to get some ideas on how to proceed effectively. Mayor Spencer stated that she supports the proposal; requested information on the dormant Airport Operations Committee and how it was formatted. The Interim City Manager stated the City now monitors 6 Committee's on airport noise, which is very time intensive for staff; the City would need to rely heavily on the citizens that have the expertise and connect them with the lobbyists to assist staff. Mayor Spencer stated the Mayor of San Leandro is connecting with the FAA and is trying to set up a phone conference. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is strength in numbers, so the City should connect with other cities to move forward. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 30 February 2, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 31 | Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is nothing preventing the parties from working out an agreement between themselves. Mayor Spencer stated the language is just clarification and is not a substantive change. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft Section 6.58-90D on parties failure to appear for the hearing; should allow an agent or a designee to attend the hearing; many of the smaller landlords are elderly or live out of town; someone with authority should attend the RRAC meeting to bind the owner to what the RRAC recommends. Mayor Spencer stated that she wants someone with ownership interest. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council agreed to change the requirement; the penalty would be if someone attends with no authority to make a decision, then the rent increase is null and void. Mayor Spencer stated the decision was to have someone with ownership interest; if there is a hardship, then someone else could attend; the default is that it be someone with ownership interest. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated if something prevents the person with ownership interest from attending, they must send someone who has the authority to act. Mayor Spencer agreed; stated the default is someone with ownership interest. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a property owner could attend who has no knowledge of the day to day operations of the property; questioned what is gained by requiring the owner attend. Councilmember Oddie stated the intent is to have larger corporation landlords, who want the 20% rent increases attend the hearing. Mayor Spencer agreed; stated she is fine with leaving ownership interest. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated to be fair and balanced for both sides, making someone get on a plane for a 6% rent increase is not justified. Councilmember Oddie stated the corporate landlords who want to increase the rent should come justify it; an elderly mom and pop landlord wanting to send their child to represent them is understandable. Mayor Spencer stated that she agrees; if the landlords are elderly or have an issue, it … | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-06-06 | 31 | the amortization schedule and how much the City would save in the CalPers contribution each year; more is saved in the long term than the short term; all options will be brought to Council. Mayor/Chair Spencer stated that she would like money allocated for the Jean Sweeney Open Park space parcels; she believes the public safety contracts are not fiscally sustainable; she would like more money to go towards parks and other items important to the community. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella requested an update on the costs of the parcels and a progress report whether grants are available; stated if Council is asking employees to pay a portion of benefits or pensions, she would like to review the benefits that Council receives. Mayor/Chair Spencer stated Council's pay rate should be reviewed. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the City Council/SACIC Budget resolutions. Councilmember/Commissioner Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Vella, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor/Chair Spencer - 1. Councilmember/Commissioner Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of workforce change resolution. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie moved approval of amending the Pension Rate Stabilization Program and Other Post-Employment Benefits Funding Policy. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Vella, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Chair Spencer - 1. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella moved approval of directing the City Manager, or designee, to deposit $6,043,000 of Committed General Fund. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice votes: Ayes: Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Vella, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Chair Spencer - 1. ADJOURNMENT Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 5 to the Community Im… | CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 31 | Councilmember Oddie stated when staff comes back, he would like to see options and examples of what other cities are doing with regards to zoning. Mayor Spencer stated her referral is very specific regarding including options like preferences for owner operators who currently live in Alameda, conditional zoning regulations and limiting the number of dispensaries; she would like the support of Council to give further directions and have staff provide specific options on September 5th and return by September 19th; she would like the process to move faster and not wait until January. The City Manager responded that January is when the State regulations will take effect and recreational use becomes legal. Mayor Spencer stated the City should be able to do the ordinance now and be prepared to go forward with recreational use in January; she does not want to wait until January to go forward with medical use; she would like to expedite the process. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Mayor Spencer is asking to have medical dispensaries before January 2018. Mayor Spencer responded that is what the City Manager stated. The City Manager responded she understood Mayor Spencer is requesting medical dispensaries to come in before recreational use. Mayor Spencer stated medical dispensaries are currently legal within the State; medical marijuana is available at dispensaries in other cities and not in Alameda; she does not want to wait until 2018 to discuss medical dispensaries; it is important to move forward with the medical portion now. Vice Mayor Vella inquired what is Mayor Spencer's timeline; stated the referral addresses other options; she does not see anything in the language of the referral that prioritizes medical dispensaries. Mayor Spencer responded since medical use is now legal, she would like to focus on proceeding with the medical aspect now. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether a draft ordinance would be presented September 5th meeting; stated that he would like to have language for the Council to review. The City… | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 31 | ordinance. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the site will be very attractive to uses that need to be on the water. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the water taxi commitment and hours, the Assistant Community Development Director stated the Master Plan commitment is that there will be a public water shuttle facility dock constructed; phasing needs to be approved before being constructed; the Transportation Management Association (TMA) will ultimately make the determination. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a commitment to have a water shuttle. Sean Whiskeman, Catellus, responded the hard work is building the infrastructure for the water shuttle; stated the actual service will fall to the TMA to generate the funds to operate the shuttle. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the City is going to have a water shuttle or only a dock. Mr. Whiskeman responded the City will receive the dock and the vessel,; stated the operating funds will be generated by the TMA; additional revenue will be allocated to the TMA from the new housing. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Catellus has had discussions with WETA. Mr. Whiskeman responded in the negative; stated Catellus plans on speaking with WETA. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the TMA will make the final decisions on the water shuttle. Mr. Whiskeman responded in the affirmative; stated the TMA board is made up of a representative of Catellus, TriPointe, the shopping center and the City. Mayor Spencer inquired whether TMA would have public meetings; and whether the public be notified of the meetings and be a part of the dialogue, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer stated the shuttle would need to be very accessible to be a part of the traffic solution; she does not want to end up with a shuttle sitting at a dock not being used; inquired whether the project will be 100% visit-ability, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer inquired whether every project can be required to… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 31 | Vice Mayor Vella inquired the base rate for the unfunded liability; is it based off current rates or a change and doe the employment numbers remain stagnate; how many employees are classic versus PEPRA employees and does that change the modeling; is there a drop off eventually; when is the City predicting employees will be retiring; does the model assume the City will maintain the current number of employees getting paid the same rate. Mr. Meyer responded the model is based off current number of employees in the classic versus PEPRA plans; slide 12 shows what is attributable to the unfunded liability and the normal costs; the bulk of the cost is the unfunded liability, which will not change much over the next 30 years; stated other cities like Alameda with reserves are also trying to pay down pension costs. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she supports the recommendation. The City Treasurer stated the recommendation is something the City needs to do; it addresses a short term need by keeping some money liquid and a long term problem by putting some money towards CalPERS; the increases in CalPERS is unavoidable and it is important to get ahead of it. Mayor Spencer requested the $2 million to the 115 Trust and the $6 million to CalPERS be bifurcated and discussed separately. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would like to see more go to OPEB; stated not all cities have the same OPEB liability; he is comfortable with the $8 million going to pension. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Councilmember Oddie stated that he understands OPEB can be dismissed in a city that declares bankruptcy, but the city is still on the hook for the pensions no matter what. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Oddie is requesting that more money go to pension. Councilmember Oddie responded he is requesting that more money go to OPEB because he believes that there will be State action on pension; he would prefer to see the City be more balanced with half to OPEB and half to pension. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Coun… | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-03-06.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2018-03-06 | 31 | The City Manager responded the issue cannot be brought back at the next meeting but would be included in the mid-cycle budget. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of accepting the reports. Councilmember/Commissioner Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried a unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Spencer adjourned the meeting at 7:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk and Secretary, SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission March 6, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-03-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 31 | Francisco adopted the resolution; the new law is going to create a number of issue that staff will have difficulty figuring out; not having a process in place could cause issues for staff; she understands staff's intent is to engage in good faith negotiations around the issue and to adhere to the current contract language in line with the provision; enacting the resolution tonight is imperative. Councilmember Oddie noted many cities adopted the same provisions while negotiating new contracts; the resolution does not say how to mitigate impact and only prescribes good faith discussions. Mayor Spencer stated the City Charter is very clear that the Council hires the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk; the City Manager works with the employees; the City ended up paying $900,000 to resolve an investigation about staying in appropriate lanes; Council hires the City Manager and the City Manager works with the employees, union or not; Human Resources handles contracts; raising the matter during negotiations is appropriate; she is comfortable with a broad statement, not directing the City Manager how to implement employee contracts; other cities do not have the same Charter provisions; she does not support the second resolved statement because she wants to honor the Charter; she does not want to support anything that suggests the City does not operate in good faith already. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution with the amendment to the further resolved statement to read: "that the Alameda City Council urges the City Manager and appropriate staff to work with the public sector unions at the City of Alameda post a Janus V. AFSCME Supreme Court case by cooperating to mitigate impacts and by engaging in good faith discussions to explain and mitigate the negative impacts of the Janus decision.' Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Acting City Manager and City Attorney would propose any draft language. The City Attorney responded the matter could come back on June 19th; discussed changes … | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 31 | In response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, the City Clerk stated Councilmembers Matarrese and Oddie have voted aye. Vice Mayor Vella requested clarification on the question being called. Mayor Spencer responded Councilmember Matarrese's motion eliminates the green area, among other things. The City Attorney inquired whether Vice Mayor Vella needs the motion re-read, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. The City Clerk restated the motion: approval of the Master Plan with items one through five listed on the handout provided by Planning staff dated July 10, 2018; with only commercial maritime in the The Assistant Community Development Director stated elimination of the artist studio and artist studio industrial from the maritime commercial. The City Clerk continued the motion: specifically eliminating the two items flagged on page 48; and re-designating the 1,900 square feet west of Building 19 as commercial maritime space. On the continuation of the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Vice Mayor Vella: Aye. Mayor Spencer stated that she could not hear; inquired whether Vice Mayor Vella voted aye, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. On the continuation of the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Vice Mayor Vella: Aye. Mayor Spencer: Aye. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would make it a unanimous vote, but she stands on her objection to getting rid of open space. The City Clerks stated the motion carried by 5 ayes. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (18-411) The Acting City Manager stated 2,500 people showed up at the Makers Faire, which had 65 exhibits, 70% of which were based in Alameda. On behalf of the Acting City Manager, the City Attorney continued the announcement regarding the success of the Alameda Mini Maker Faire. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 23 July 10, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2019-07-16 | 31 | The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 26 July 16, 2019 | CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 31 | and the mayor on respective roles. At times there can be a conflict between the role the mayor views themselves as playing and the expectations of the remainder of the council. It is difficult if the manager gets caught in a dispute over these respective roles. In particular, how the city manager relates to the mayor versus the other councilmembers needs to be clear. Don't blame the manager or staff for carrying out the direction of the city council: The city manager and staff are required to faithfully carry out the direction of the city council, regardless if they did or did not recommend it and regardless if some councilmembers oppose it. Respect the staff for faithfully carrying out the will of the council, whether or not you share the view of the council majority. If the council/manager relationship is not going well: If you or the council are having difficulty with the city manager, try your best to resolve the issue. First of all, find an appropriate way to communicate the concerns. The manager can't respond if he/she is not aware of the concern. As noted earlier, try to obtain clear council consensus for the expectations for the manager and communicate those expectations clearly. Try to be optimistic regarding the possibility of the manager making adjustments to satisfy the concerns of the council and give sufficient time to do so. Additionally, provide the manager opportunities to respond to the feedback and communicate how he/she will address the concerns. If all else fails and there needs to be a "parting of the ways": A forced separation of the manager is not a good experience for the council, the manager or the city. It can be costly, controversial and can cast everyone in a negative light. It can also erode citizen confidence in the city. Assuming all 11- 25 | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2020-03-03 | 31 | should focus shift to DePave Park; that she can research an RFP process of this type; there is no funding attached to issuing an RFP. Councilmember Oddie expressed support. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (20-139) The City Manager made an announcement regarding the Coronavirus and the Cross Alameda Trail event. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (20-140) Consider Directing Staff to Provide Health Insurance to Part-Time Employees Working Over 20 Hours per Week in Time for Fiscal Year 2020-21. (Councilmember Oddie) Not heard. (20-141) Consider Providing Direction to Staff on Handling Late Rent Payments. (Councilmember Oddie) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (20-142) Councilmember Vella discussed the Lead Abatement meeting last week, a Girl's Inc. event, and the Cross Alameda Trail event. (20-143) Councilmember Oddie requested the meeting be adjourned in memory of Frank Munoz. (20-144) Councilmember Daysog announced Nick Cabral's birthday. (20-145) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding the Cross Alameda Trail event; discussed the League of California Cities meeting discussion on housing; and an Alameda Healthcare District Board meeting and discussion addressing Coronavirus. ADJOURNMENT (20-146) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting with a moment of silence in memory of Frank Munoz at 11:44 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 28 March 3, 2020 | CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2020-05-19 | 31 | stated Webster Street does not have a parking structure; urged the City to plan for a Webster Street parking structure or solution; expressed concern about partially closing of Versailles Avenue without advance public discussion: Jim Strehlow, Alameda. The Senior Transportation Coordinator stated a recent report showed a child on a bike almost hit by a speeding car at Pacific Avenue and Schiller Street; the intersection is without a barricade; a barricade is be requested at the intersection. Vice Mayor Knox White stated that he appreciates the network map included in the staff report; noted the map shows developing the program into the business portion; slower streets are safer than what exists; noted a pedestrian was hit earlier in the day at a properly designed intersection of Constitution Way and Buena Vista Avenue; stated current streets are not hospitable to those walking and bicycling; expressed support for the program, and prioritizing signage at every intersection; stated it is not a shelter in place program, it is a social distancing program; the program is going to be needed at least through the end of 2020. Councilmember Vella expressed support for more signage and barricades, especially where near misses have occurred; stated the design should be as safe as possible; expressed concern about limited information being provided and learning about programs after-the-fact; signage and barricades are critical at pass-through traffic areas; the program is related to social distancing and many people will be working and learning from home until the end of the year; the program should be continued until at least the end of 2020. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the program; stated that she regrets the lack of notification to residents; the program was brought by a series of unfortunate incidents; the program should be expanded over time under the Active Transportation Plan to allow for community input; discussed walking through town; stated residents support slowing streets; people are still shelterin… | CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 31 | bureaucratic; urged Council move out of the formal roles to have real, ordinary communications: Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda. Comments read into the record: Stated it has been almost two months since Mali Watkins was arrested; other Councils around the Bay Area have taken steps toward reimagining public safety; justice delayed is justice denied; urged Council to take action to declare racism an emergency and take actions to counteract racism in the community: Carly Stadum-Liang, Alameda. Urged Council to release the Police Chief; discussed the detainment of Mali Watkins and the Police Chief: Seth Marbin, Alameda. Expressed support for some of the initial efforts made to address transforming Alameda's public safety; expressed concern about how the efforts are beginning; inquired the reason for no community engagement by the subcommittee, the purpose of the work done in the past four weeks and ways in which Council will amplify the needs and contributions of Black Alamedans: Savanna Cheer, Alameda. Expressed support for adding the voices of health care providers to the steering committee and that each steering subcommittee be comprised of 50% BIPOC members and compensated; stated there will be an increase in inclusive structures which support diverse participation: Jyothi Marbin, Alameda. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the City Manager address the committee selection process; stated this is the first attempt at an ambitious undertaking; stated Brown Act meetings can span a number of hours and be time consuming, including public comment; outlined the public requests for moving out of formal meeting roles; stated Council must remain respectful of community volunteers' time commitment; expressed support for stipends paid for participants and for meals being provided. Councilmember Vella stated direction and authorization was given by Council at previous meetings to allow stipends; expressed support for staff providing the selection process; instant change does not allow for a community process; a balance is being attempt… | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 31 | In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Vice Mayor Vella stated one of the points of clarification of the first motion that she requested was relative to Councilmember Knox White's comment that the City look at different regional changes being implemented regarding non-armed response, including use of technology which is part of the AB 550 legation. Councilmember Knox White stated that he supports the motion, with the understanding it is at the bottom of the priority pile. Vice Mayor Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter was contained as part of the first motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. (21-175) Recommendation to Consider Options for the Alameda Police Department's Emergency Response Vehicle. Not heard. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS Not heard. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Not heard. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-176) Consider Establishing a New Methodology by which the Number of Housing Units are Calculated for Parcels Zoned C-2-PD (Central Business District with Planned Development Overlay). Not heard. (Councilmember Daysog) (21-177) Consider Directing Staff to Provide an Update on a Previously Approved Referral regarding Free Public WiFi throughout the City. Not heard. (Councilmember Spencer) (21-178) Consider Directing Staff to Extend Webster Street Physical Improvements/ Beautification. Not heard. (Councilmember Daysog) (21-179) Consider Directing Staff to Review an "Adopt a Spot" Traffic Triangle, Traffic Circle and Traffic Corners Program. Not heard. (Councilmember Daysog) (21-180) Consider Directing Staff to Provide a Public Analysis of: 1) When the Brown Act Applies to Commissions and Committees, 2) Documents and Information Released Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 31 March 16, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 31 | consequences for families as well as the vibrancy of the community; discussed neighbors that have moved away due to displacement; the City has a responsibility to the past to build a better community and ensuring residential zoning results in 5,300 units between 2023 and 2031: urged Council adopt the staff resolution: Gaylon Parsons, Alameda. Expressed support for the City staff resolution; stated it is important that affordable and multi-family housing is dispersed around the City and not pressed onto the base; AFFH ensures the benefits and opportunities of having neighbors of different class statuses and ages; urged Council consider the future when investing in creating the needed community: Grover Wehman-Brown Alameda. Discussed a letter submitted; expressed support for filing the appealfor the Planning Board recommendation to delete the Article 26 clause; stated alternative language should be included should Council wish to leave the clause,; he would like input from the City Attorney as to the necessity of including a statement; State law only partially preempts Article 26; the overall strategy presented in the staff report is good; expressed support for further promotion of Alameda Point and Encinal Terminal sites, including a request from the Navy to remove the cap on Alameda Point: Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society. Urged Council to direct staff to develop a comprehensive game plan to successfully renegotiate Alameda Point's residential cap with the United States Navy; stated there is agreement in adopting a Housing Element which maximizes the use of City owned land at Alameda Point; the space is a tool for meeting the RHNA number; it is clear that the City cannot maximize the use of City owned land at Alameda Point without lifting unreasonable and outdated caps on housing units; the effort must begin now and be on a parallel track with preparing the Housing Element; expressed support for adding language to the resolution which acknowledges the City taking action to renegotia… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 31 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed concern about Council not having an ability to review proposed projects; noted the recommendation provided by the City Manager addresses the concerns. Councilmember Daysog stated staff may return in one or two years if issues with change orders and small grants persists; expressed support for the recommendation provided by the City Manager. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would not bring change orders to Council; the City has a competent PAC; she has faith in staff; expressed concern about being in the weeds and causing project delays; stated art can be subjective; questioned the standards to be held and applied by Council; expressed support for staff's recommendation; stated the City Manager's proposed recommendation is reasonable. Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for the City Manager's recommended modification; expressed concern about the number of matters run by Council; stated there are many items for Council to deal with; she understands the concern posed by Councilmember Knox White related to outlier scenarios; the proposed change relates to an issue that has not necessarily arisen and that would be a rarity; expressed concern about the process being misused. Councilmember Knox White stated everything currently comes to Council; noted staff has proposed to have nothing come to Council. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is comfortable with the staff recommendation. The Economic Development Manager stated all public art matters can be appealed through the City Council; a 10 day period after approval can occur for appeals sent to City Council. Councilmember Daysog stated that he feels like Santa Claus when art projects are approved; he is helping bequeath an item which will be an artistic benefit; expressed concern about giving up Council approval; expressed concern for appeal processes. The City Attorney stated the proposed language to include in the ordinance will read: "The Alameda City Council shall authorize expenditures from the Alameda public art fund cons… | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 31 | employment; the benefit is being added on; she understands the service credit in the department; expressed support for AFD; stated Firefighters are breathing harmful and unhealthy air and deserve lifetime medical benefits; she can justify the service credit for those working in AFD; however, she has a difficult time seeing the credit applied to someone coming in from the outside; the City will have to grapple with how to pay its unfunded OPEB liabilities. Councilmember Daysog stated the time limit allows the City to experiment. Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of resolution, with a caveat to have it sunset in five years. Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion. Under discussion, the City Manager stated that he recommends the motion be consistent with the staff recommendation to amend the resolution to indicate the benefits are only for similar benefits held at a previous organization, and will not exceed said previous benefits. Councilmembers Daysog and Knox White accepted the recommendation as an amendment to the motion. Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for training first responders in order to allow for promotions; stated the City has historically tried to promote from within; she will not be supporting the matter due to being concerned about the policy. On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3. (21-554) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to the Lease with Dreyfuss Capital Partners, a California Limited Liability Company to Extend the Term for Five Years for Building 29, Located at 1701 Monarch Street, at Alameda Point. Introduced. The Management Analyst gave a brief presentation. The City Attorney stated the title of the matter reads five years; the substance of the staff recommendation is for 4 years and 11 months; he would like to clearly reflect that the Council action will b… | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 31 | meters. The Police Captain responded sworn Officers can enforce parking violations; stated APD tries not to use sworn Officers for parking enforcement; however, APD Parking Technician staff is low; Technicians are not sworn Officers. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how APD knows whether a car is stolen; whether Public Works staff will be able to run license plates to check for stolen vehicles; what follow up will occur under Public Works. The Police Captain responded a vehicle found by Public Works staff that is believed to be stolen will require staff to reach out to APD; stated a stolen vehicle will necessitate a sworn Officer response; staff will also need to contact APD if a vehicle needs to be towed for blocking a driveway or citation is needed for parking on private property, both of which require license plates to be run; Officers use CLETS to identify registered owners. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how Public Works parking enforcement staff will suspect a vehicle is stolen. The Public Works Director responded APD will be able to provide Public Works staff with a hot list that can be loaded into the handheld device; Public Works parking technicians will not be able to see owner information; however, vehicle on the hot list will be seen for coordination with APD. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether Amber Alerts will immediately be placed on the list. The Police Captain responded stolen vehicles are entered into CLETS by the initial reporting agency; the update is dependent on the originating agency; sometimes the update is immediate and other times the report updates after several hours. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the information normally goes to APD; however, will now go to Public Works staff; inquired how the information will flow from APD to Public Works. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the functions of the handheld devices. The Public Works Director responded that she can speak generally on the devices but does not yet have detailed knowledge; stated that she does not have infor… | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 31 | programs require the City to have a certified HE; the City needs to take the HE seriously and comply with State law; expressed support for the various options and creative ways to provide compliance; stated the City can add a number of different housing units and sizes in order to satisfy the affordable by design approach; discussed concerns raised by WABA and area residents; stated there is an opportunity to provide form based zoning cones similar to Park Street; expressed support for more right-sized residential, and doing more in the historic area of Webster Street with corner buildings being anchors; stated that she advocates for a walking tour of the area; there is potential to add housing stock in the transit corridors; she supports making the business districts more vital and visited; urged the building of more housing in order to address homelessness; expressed support for the next steps. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated the next steps include staff meeting with the Historical Advisory Board on Thursday and the Planning Board on Monday; staff will finish consolidating all comments received and perform additional cleanup and adjustments to the draft HE to put the City in the best possible position with HCD; the draft HE will be sent to HCD and staff will spend the next three months working with the Planning Board and community to continue to refine the zoning and start getting into the details; staff will hear back from HCD towards the end of August; once staff knows what HCD thinks of the City's HE, the Planning Board and Council will hold public hearings and start making tough decisions about what needs to be done in response to HCD comments to ensure certification; once staff hears back from HCD, another Council workshop will be held; the Planning Board will have the first round of heavy lifting; Council may provide direction to the Planning Board; the current schedule is to have Council see the HE in November or December; the HE needs to be completed by January 2023. Councilmem… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf,31 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-05-09 | 31 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MUTES OF Wednesday May 9, 2018 6:30 p.m. Beth Kenny: Thank you. Commissioner Deutsch, do you have any announcements you'd like to make? Susan Deutsch: No. Beth Kenny: Vice Chair Barrett? Jenn Barrett: No. Beth Kenny: Commissioner Hall? Commissioner Aghapekian? I have a few. First, I think it's also on the 19th, a sub-section of the Alameda PTA for students with disabilities usually has a resource fair, but this year instead, they've opted to have a picnic and they wanted to let you all know that you're invited. I'll be sending out something via Laurie, but I wanted to keep that on your radar. And all community members are invited. So if you're able to, please attend. Beth Kenny: And then I wanted to mention quickly that there were two things sent out about a job fair in San Francisco Public Library, and then also the Exploratorium is going to be hosting a job fair for people with disabilities to get jobs in that, not only with the Exploratorium but with a few other museums in San Francisco. So please, if you know anyone, send them out that information that has been sent out to you. And if anyone needs that information, they can contact Laurie or myself and we can resend that to you. Beth Kenny: I attended the Marina Shores, they had an open house this past weekend, and that is the development that's going to be going along the estuary over along Clement Street there. And it was very interesting. It was on a barge, where they're going to have four of these barges to make them like a community center where there will be makerspace and recreation. I got the card of a woman who is going to be working on the recreation stuff because I wanted to talk further. Commissioner Deutsch, I know you're connected with BORP [Bay Area Outreach and Recreation Program]? I always get that name wrong. Susan Deutsch: Well, I've contacted them many times, but we've never been able to get them here. Beth Kenny: Yes. They're very into the idea of having accessible ways for people to get on the water, whic… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf,31 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-11-28 | 31 | ITEM 2-A COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, November 28, 2018, 6:30 PM Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: And then she's the one who reported it, but I'm sure that it happens to people a lot more often than we know of. So I definitely want to take it seriously and look into it. Jennifer Roloff: Do we know, so if you actually call the fire department, they would say, "Sorry, no"? Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: That's what an email correspondence that Laurie had said, yeah. It's not part of their. Arnold Brillinger: They may show up though. I've had occasion where I was dropped off, and instead of turning right on the sidewalk, I went over on the grassy area, and it was right after a big rain, and if I would have kept on going, I would have gotten back to the sidewalk, but stupid me, I stopped for a moment, and then tried to get going again, and just dug a big old pit in the people's lawn. And in that case, I did call the fire department, they sent out some burly guys and they alley- ooped me back to the sidewalk. So, there are certain situations where they will, but in this one, I don't remember, it was some kind of a mechanical problem, I think. Laurie Kozisek: Madam Chairman, I believe in your case, Commissioner Arnold, it was a lift assist. They were getting you back up on your feet, so to speak. And they do that a lot. They do it every day with people. Whereas this person that contacted you and contacted us was in good health, but had a chair that wouldn't move, and so she essentially needed another way to get home. And so the staff got her out to the curb and got an Uber or something like that for her to get her home. So the fire department wouldn't have been able to drive her home. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Okay. So, it's understanding the differences of what is under their role, and then what is beyond their role that is the gap that we're missing. Does anyone have any further comments or announcements? Jennifer Roloff: I just wanted to remind everyone, or share that December 15th, between 10:00 AM an… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,31 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 31 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,31 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 31 | rve Courts 1-6 at Fairfield Tennis Comale piokie We the ball undersigned, courts since call the on the City of Alameda and ARPD to drop the consideration to converting court #4 or any of the tannis courts at WAPA, Krusi or Leydecker pario couris into after 4pm and on all the higher demand for tennia courta that has also occurred this year. The walt times to play tennis at WAPA. Kruoi, Leydeckor are excessive during the weekdays logking into meeting Longletow courts are alreedy home to pickle bati We request the city and ARPD look into other solutions for the pickle ball demand and we also request College of Atameda, weckendu, base courts The existing tennie courto are not enough to meet this demand for tennia courta currently in Alameda Tennis courts currently not being used: AHS FHS zil Full name Posteode Email address Signature 94501 He LEARA SUMRALL 94501 MiTCHCOBLUE@AT for Bill Griesel William 94501 bilgrieselfritional can Science AurelioPalmania 94606 Kwok Yin Chan 94501 Kwookyiuchou@me id Takeen Runi 94612 kholo app a unney 7 UNE 94552 no Lawrence yee 94501 AILIANA FATRICK 94578 jybpsyy4me@yahoo.com Curt Paige Ivey 94501 lenorepaige@gmail.com Sira c. 94501 Sive If staron Gooz24501 UgnicMically 94501 Patrick Kim 94001 hotinat one patrick. Kim@ bioneer. 45.com oz Published and promoted by the Alameda Happy Tennis Group at Fairfield Tennis Complex When complein, please return to: The Alameda Happy Tonnis Group at Fairfleld Tennis Complex or email diristly to both gov and awooldidge@alamedace.gov For tmoreinte please join our Facebook Croup, We may contact you fur spolatos on DE IVE will not une your information fer wy other purposs or shan # with any other | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );