pages: TransportationCommission/2009-04-22.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
TransportationCommission | 2009-04-22 | 14 | DRAFT Chair Knox White noted the threshold of significance for Alternative 1 was taken. Commissioner Krueger stated he didn't realize there had been a split. Chair Knox White indicated this should have been an action item. The Commission made its recommendation, so if needed it could be brought back at the next meeting for a vote. Chair Knox White noted there were thresholds of significance that had not been voted on yet; taking no action on those. Referred to Alternative 2, page 1, 1 bullet, last 2 bullets, and staff recommendation about including removal of crosswalks. He suggested recommending those four points. The Commission recommended approval of the staff recommendation. The Commission recommended the addition of the following to the thresholds of significance: "if a segment has a Class I facility and has not been recommended for future bike lane, the degradation of LOS to E would be not considered a significant impact". Commissioner Krueger stated the presentation was very well done, especially the charts. 8. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Broadway/Jackson Update Staff Khan noted had received responses from Caltrans in terms of PSR. Noted ACTIA was about to issue an RFP for the analysis of the "horseshoe". Chair Knox White inquired if Caltrans was allowing it to move forward. Staff Khan noted that staff's approach was to use them to do the analysis. Upcoming development-related traffic studies and plans Staff Khan noted that Boatworks' Project has been slowed down. Future meeting agenda items Staff Khan stated casual carpool will be coming to the May meeting, including a presentation on what has been done, and a recommendation. Chair Knox White stated hopefully the long-range transit plan update will be agendized. Staff Khan stated it could be brought forward for discussion but not sure how it would be funded. Staff Khan noted a final recommendation would be presented. Staff Bergman noted the CMA was interested in brining in a draft of its Community Based Transportation Plan for input. ILC Update Staff Khan noted several issues were discussed; Line 51 & performance measures from AC Transit; when those are received they will be shared with the Commission; Line 63 - AC Transit Page 14 of 15 | TransportationCommission/2009-04-22.pdf |