pages: TransportationCommission/2007-05-23.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
TransportationCommission | 2007-05-23 | 3 | monies would not cover the developer's pro rata share for any new signals. This would be funded separately and independently as project impact mitigations. 7. Table 3.12-6: There is a projected increase in delay from 280.9 seconds to 328.2 seconds during the AM peak, although there is no increase expected during the PM peak. According to 3.1207, delay during the AM peak is projected to increase from 648.3 seconds to 747.6 seconds. Delay during the PM peak is projected to increase from 431.5 seconds to 912.1 seconds, which exceeds the City's threshold of significance. 8. Page 3.12-16 (TR-2): The DEIR indicates that if the intersections of Harbor Bay Parkway at North Loop Road and South Loop Road, and at Harbor Bay Parkway at South Loop Road and B Street, it is expected that traffic signals would eventually be required should further development occur. The DEIR states that the project would pay towards these signals as part of the TIF, but it should be more specific that this will be a pro rata share based on the project impacts. The TIF monies would not cover the developer's pro rata share for any new signals, and they would need to be funded independently as project impact mitigations. 9. Mitigation Measure TR-2.1: This discusses only the signal at the intersection of Harbor Bay Parkway and North Loop and South Loop. 10. Table S-1: Summarizes the mitigation measures also does not mention the signal at Harbor Bay Parkway and South Loop and B. 11. The developer must pay the Citywide Developer Fee to mitigate for cumulative impacts associated with the project. Staff recommends that the Transportation Commission review the DEIR for the Harbor Bay Village VI, and provide comments, which will be forwarded to the Planning Board. Staff Bergman projected the project map on the overhead screen. Chair Knox White invited comment from the AC Transit representatives. They had no comment. Chair Knox White recommended that because this change would require a General Plan Amendment, from commercial-business to residential, and that as such it represented a significant change in policy, which is the purview of the Transportation Commission to make recommendations on. Before the DEIR moves forward, he requested that policy change for the General Plan be brought to the Transportation Commission for comments on the transportation issues. Commissioner Krueger noted that would presuppose a change to the General Plan. Commissioner Ratto requested that because Item 7A would entail a lengthy discussion, that the Transportation Commission hear Item 7B first, and then return to Item 7A. Chair Knox White agreed with Commissioner Ratto's suggestion, and postponed the discussion until Item 7A has been heard. Transportation Commission May 23, 2007 Page 3 of 12 | TransportationCommission/2007-05-23.pdf |