pages: PublicArtCommission/2007-11-29.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PublicArtCommission | 2007-11-29 | 8 | Mr. Wolfe said that they may want to go back and be very strict about performance spaces because the 1% doesn't cover performance spaces very well. He wants more foresight instead of hindsight. Ms. Rosenberg stated that the better performance area is outside Nob Hill foods; it's not behind the dog wash. She questions who approved the project. Mr. Wolfe suggested that the item of looking back at the yearly program be agendized for January. He referenced the library and suggested more open dialog. Ms. Huston asked Mr. Vu if there was anything that could be done about Bridgeside. She asked what they could recommend to press the space so it could actually be used as a performance space. The commission asked if there was a person who was supposed in charge of the programming for the space. Ms. Rosenberg stated that it is crucial that they come back to the commission and wanted to ask that they come to the commission to present a program for comments and revisions. Ms. Huston feels that it is a very complicated issue and that enforcement is huge. Mr. Wolfe asked about enforcement and if anyone had gone out to check what the grades are. He feels that if the grades are not accurate, they are not acceptable Ms. Huston had a couple of assignments for staff, check the grades and check the amendments, and ask planning what are they allowed to do for enforcement. Mr. Wolfe mentioned the temporary permits. Mr. Vu said that they developer has received the temporary certificate of occupancy. He said that the commission has some leverage to make the developer compliant before they receive their certificate of occupancy. He also suggested that staff make the developer check the grades and come back to the commission. Ms. Huston wants the to go all out and give them a report on letterhead and she wants a fact sheet before the developer comes back to the commission. What the commission needs to know is what the amended agreement was. She wants to send out a request for information. Mr. Vu clarified the agenda items for January 9 meeting. Ms. Huston wanted to talk about the possible expenditures. Ms. Rosenberg asked about agendizing the cap. Ms. Huston replied that her top priority was hearing back from City Council. She suggested a subcommittee to look at the cap. 6. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 8:53 pm 8 | PublicArtCommission/2007-11-29.pdf |