pages: PublicArtCommission/2007-03-28.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PublicArtCommission | 2007-03-28 | 3 | Chair Huston clarified that the Commission is the filter by which the city acquires art and they do not get to select the art. They make sure the art is in public view. Ms. Woodbury suggested that people who are interested in public art take a look at the projects that are going to the Planning Board, go to the meetings and get involved in the developments. Chair Huston suggested creating a proposal for curatorial management and the in lieu fund could pay for this. Ms. Woodbury responded by clarifying that the in lieu fund could not be used for a curator but rather for hardware to hang pictures, etc. Ms. Burnett asked if the Commission gives developers a list of artists to choose from. Chair Huston responded by clarifying that the Commission cannot give specific names to avoid a conflict of interest. The amphitheater at the Bridgeside Shopping Center was mentioned. The general consensus was that the finished project was not what was proposed and that it is not suitable for most of the events that were proposed such as musical acts and literary readings. Ms. Woodbury clarified the role of the planning department and that they make sure the art for a project is feasible and they make sure the project is built according to the plans that were approved. Commissioner Wolfe clarified that the Commission only approves concepts and not plans. Mr. Vu stated that the developers at Bridgeside are required to submit an annual programming plan and when finished, an on-site manager will oversee the programming plan for three years. This must be submitted to and approved by Ms. Woodbury. Chair Huston replied by saying that the developer was required to provide a useful community performance space and an audience. She expressed concern as to who will oversee the programming for the space to make sure they fulfill their obligations. It was asked if the in lieu fund could be used for existing projects. A response was given that the in lieu fund cannot be used for existing projects, only new projects. Ms. Burnett offered her services and experience as an art consultant and developer for future projects. The Carnegie building was mentioned. Ms. Woodbury responded by saying that consultants are being recruited to submit ideas for its usage. General consensus was reached that the conversation needs to be expanded to include more people, ideas and proposals in the community. | PublicArtCommission/2007-03-28.pdf |