pages: PublicArtCommission/2007-02-28.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PublicArtCommission | 2007-02-28 | 3 | The Commission then proposed the idea of a catalog, or record of art projects. The catalog would be for future Commission Members and would consist of several items: 1. The original art proposal for a given project 2. A review of the finished product 3. Commission Member comments and opinions on the finished product and how accurate it was to the original proposal. The Commission felt this would be a valuable asset and a good reference for creating and updating the art review process. d. Performing Arts Program at Bridgeside Shopping Center Chair Huston felt the conditions of approval did not reflect the programming that the applicant and Commission agreed to, and therefore, the resolution approving the Bridgeside amphitheatre project was inaccurate. She expressed that the applicant should be held to their agreed details, even though specific details weren't reflected in the resolution. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Chair Huston expressed concern regarding whether the renovation of the Historic Alameda Theater will fulfill the public art requirement. She stated that any restoration work already being done as part of the project's scope couldn't also be used to fulfill the public art requirement. She stated there were inaccuracies identified in Development Services' staff report to City Council. Commissioner Wolfe stated that he disagreed with Chair Huston's assessment of the Ordinance and its Policy Guidelines regarding what aspects of a project can be used to fulfill the public art requirement. Chair Huston and Commissioner Wolfe agreed to review the Ordinance and its Policy Guidelines and discuss their findings at the next meeting. 7. ADJOURNMENT: 8:45 pm Respectfully submitted, Douglas Vu, Secretary Public Art Commission | PublicArtCommission/2007-02-28.pdf |