pages: PublicArtCommission/2006-07-26.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PublicArtCommission | 2006-07-26 | 2 | 5. New Business -NONE 6. Old Business A. Alameda Towne Center Chair inquired as to why two different drafts of the proposal were issued. Tad was given a draft for his review that encouraged his edits and comments when the commission did not feel that was his position. Staff explained that Tad received a different draft per previous discussions and agreement between Andrew and Tad. Prior discussions regarding the "Brown Act" and discussions with the Commissioner resulted in the special review of only C Huston and Tad review the draft at this time. C Rosenberg requested they be given a copy of the draft upon completion for the PAC to review. Staff agreed to distribute to the entire commission upon completed draft. Commission requested written communication upon next meeting for review. Commission and staff agreed. C/VC/CM/Staff Approved (4) - Huston, Lee, Rosenberg, Wolfe Absent (1) - Cervantes 7. Subcommittee Reports A. Theater and Garage Project SC met with the City/Client and reviewed the current two submitted artist murals however, the council was not impressed with the current selections. They didn't feel the work was the artist strongest or best selections. They requested Jennifer Ott attend the council meeting in the future and supply the committee with additional artist for review and consideration. Jennifer and Staff will review the artist concepts and context of murals prior to the review of the SC. SC recommended the artist have a stronger and more narrative "pitch". Staff will check with Jennifer Ott and the artist prior to the sub-proposal. SC discussed that the Garage piece is a temporary canvas. Staff will confirm with Jennifer Ott regarding permanent nature of piece. 8. Commissioner Communications C Huston asked about the status of "Bridge Side". Staff stated project was recently assigned to him and current status unknown. Commissioner stated they previously made recommendations upon the "early" sketches that the PUC stay in contact with the commission, but no contact has been kept. There was also earlier discussion regarding the budget and calculation of the sculpture. They were waiting to find out what 1% of the proposed budget cost would be of the project. The previous figure given by the artist was $35,000.00 which didn't add up to the PAC Meeting Minutes 2 July 26, 2006 | PublicArtCommission/2006-07-26.pdf |