pages: PlanningBoard/2021-07-26.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2021-07-26 | 15 | Mr. Ebert added there would not be licensed medical care 24 hours a day, licensed medical care would only be available in the clinic. He then discussed that they would be all-electric. They had been looking at all the code requirements and would meet all the Title 24 California Code Requirements and the City of Alameda's requirements. Board Member Hom thanked the applicants for the presentation and had no further questions at this time. Board Member Cisneros stated that she too had previously met with the applicant and had no further questions. President Teague asked how the trash would be handled on-site for this building. Mr. Ebert explained how trash would work. President Teague opened public comments. He reminded everyone that this was an opportunity to speak on the proposed design only. He stated if anyone deviated from this he would ask that they hold their comments until the Oral Comments section of the meeting. Zac Bowling thought this was a great addition to Alameda and fit in well with the other buildings on McKay Ave. He thought it would well serve the people who needed a facility like this. He was in strong support and asked that the board support this as well. Jay Garfinkle was unsure of what fell under "Design Review" and wanted to discuss the uses as well. He wanted to discuss the function of the building*. *President Teague clarified again what fell under the Design Review and cut off Mr. Garfinkle when he kept discussing the use of the building. Bronwyn Harris was very excited about this addition to the neighborhood. She thought it looked beautiful and went really well with the setting. She hoped the board would approve the design. Carmen Reid wanted to discuss the preservation of the building and wanted to make the applicant use adaptive reuse*. *President Teague reminded her that this was a Design Review and when she continued to speak off-topic she was cut off. He reminded her that her comment would be best at the Oral Communication portion. John Healy discussed the application and how this was the first they had heard of it. He also thought the EIR was wrong*. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 15 of 21 July 26, 2021 | PlanningBoard/2021-07-26.pdf |