pages: PlanningBoard/2021-06-14.pdf, 12
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2021-06-14 | 12 | when he and his fellow board members joined this board they swore an oath to protect the City Charter as much as he had issues with Article 26. Board Member Rothenberg asked about the legal bindings of the resolution with and without the references to Article 26 suggested by President Teague to be struck. President Teague said it would be a different message altogether and once it went to City Council they would have more room to work in. He added that this was just a recommendation and he believed that with the proposed edits the resolution had a better chance of being approved by the City Council. Board Member Cisneros summarized her understanding of the intent of the original wording and noted that keeping the language would bring the issue of Article 26 to the forefront. President Teague and Board Member Hom exchanged comments on the suggested wording. Board Member Hom asked how important it was to mention Article 26 in the resolution. Director Thomas explained that this is ultimately the Planning Board's resolution and understood that how the board was conflicted with the issue. President Teague made a motion to approve the Draft Resolution to the City Council with the following modifications. In the title remove everything after "and finds that the City Charter", also strike everything in the "therefore" paragraph, and in the "be it" paragraph strike the word "further". Then in the 2nd bullet add the wording "contrary to the City Charter Article 26 as necessary to comply with State Law". Board Member Rothenberg seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed 4-0 with Vice President Saheba and Board Member Curtis absent and Board Member Ruiz abstained. 7-C 2021-1018 Public Hearing to Receive Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update. President Teague opened public comments. There were no public comments. President Teague closed public comments and opened the board's discussion. Board Member Ruiz asked if only one of the two volumes were available for review since she had only received one. She wanted to know if there was still time to make comments. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 12 of 14 June 14, 2021 | PlanningBoard/2021-06-14.pdf |