pages: PlanningBoard/2021-04-26.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2021-04-26 | 15 | with Vice President Saheba that developers had to be specific about everything else and that they can also be specific about the proposed art. Director Thomas said it would be part of the Design Review Approval for the project. He then discussed the process and when the staff could bring something back to the Planning Board. They would not be approving the art because that would still be with the PAC. Board Member Ruiz asked if the Community Development Director's role would be struck out in this iteration. Director Thomas said it would. Staff Member Butler said if they were talking about location then the PAC was fine with that. She then said they could add that it be the Planning Director who it would go back to. Board Member Hom and Director Thomas said it depended on the conditions. Staff Member Butler and Director Thomas discussed the language in the provision about moving the location of the on-site art and what wording was unnecessary and what the role of the Director needed to be. President Teague suggested striking a part to cause the process to fall in line with how other changes are handled. Board Member Hom agreed and said letting the regular process to govern made sense. He was in favor of simplifying and deleting parts of the wording. Staff Member Butler was concerned that with the new iteration it would not come back to the PAC at all. After much discussion, it was decided to continue this item to the next meeting to revise the language. Board Member Curtis wanted the language to give the most flexibility to the board to get things done quickly. Board Member Hom wanted language that made it clear that money in the in-lieu fund was meant for maintenance for public art on public property. Staff Member Butler also said they would clarify the language around the City Manager's expense limit. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 15 of 18 April 26, 2021 | PlanningBoard/2021-04-26.pdf |