pages: PlanningBoard/2021-04-26.pdf, 11
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2021-04-26 | 11 | Alameda's community of artists and hoped the Planning Board supported these amendments to the Public Art Ordinance. President Teague closed the public comments and opened board discussions. Board Member Rothenberg agreed with President Teague that while the staff report was good it didn't tell the whole story of what they were trying to achieve. The intent had merit and she believed the changes as explained should have an overall benefit to the city. She also believed that the staff report belied that the ordinance revisions as indicated by the underlining text did something she didn't read in the report. She said there should be another bullet since there were two delegations of authority to the Community Development Director. She pointed out these examples and added that with delegations it needed to be as clear as possible. She believed that the proposals appeared to have merit subject to subsequent comments. Board Member Hom thought the amendments were good. He had only one suggestion, he thought it would be good to clarify in section 30-98.10 that the Alameda Public Art Fund was only to be used for public art located on public property. He understood there could be exceptions. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 11 of 18 April 26, 2021 | PlanningBoard/2021-04-26.pdf |