pages: PlanningBoard/2021-03-22.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2021-03-22 | 6 | Board Member Curtis agreed with his colleagues and would support this. He too was disappointed that the applicant was not present. Board Member Cisneros did not have any issues and looked forward to the applicant incorporating these comments once it got to the Building Permit phase. President Teague was also disappointed in the plans. He was in favor of directing staff to have the applicant clean up their plans, he was not comfortable approving the provided plans. He was not against this plan but the plans needed to be complete and describe what they are doing. Staff Member Tai summarized the comments from the board. The applicant needed to submit revised plans and include specific details such as existing and proposed siding. As well as the restoration of the brackets and details about the stairs and railing (plans should reflect wood) and a color materials board. Board Member Hom added that there should also be an elevation showing the modification for the entrance to the ADU. He added that he only brought that up from a Design Review perspective that there was respect for the existing architecture of the house and not related to the ADU use at all. Staff Member Tia said that for information purposes, they could ask the applicant to include that. He also informed the board that in cases with code enforcement when a lot of the work was already done the goal was to quickly move the project through the Design Review stage and into the Building Permit stage. Many of the details are worked through during inspections. He did agree that the plans and the details could be better. Board Member Ruiz made a motion to approve the project with the conditions listed to staff. The applicant needed to submit revised plans and include specific details such as existing and proposed siding. As well as the restoration of the brackets and details about the stairs (plans should reflect wood) and railing and a color materials board. Board Member Curtis seconded the motion and a roll call vote was taken. The motion passed 7-0. 7-B 2021-759 Review and Comment on the General Plan Schedule of Planning Board Public Hearings. Andrew Thomas, Director of Planning, Building, and Transportation, gave a presentation. The staff report can be found at https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4836619&GUID=DB91DBAE- 82C0-45DB-ACAB-C542D5931F49&FullText=1 President Teague opened public comments. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 6 of 10 March 22, 2021 | PlanningBoard/2021-03-22.pdf |