pages: PlanningBoard/2021-02-22.pdf, 10
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2021-02-22 | 10 | Staff Member Tai said currently it is the Planning Board's decision based on findings such as distance and that the public space would be beneficial to the occupants of the development project. Board Member Ruiz also wanted to address Board Member Curtis's concern on Affordable Housing. She said that the state does mandate that Affordable Housing had to have open space, each of the units had to have private open space in order to meet state funding requirements. This would be a given regardless of what the local zoning ordinance said. Board Member Curtis said that information from Board Member Ruiz solved his issue. Staff Member Tai clarified the standardized amount of open space across districts. He shared information about the North Park District and what the open space requirements were. Board Member Hom said he was supportive of the uniform open space across the board. He saw the main constraint was the high density. He made sense that open space should correlate with density. Board Member Rothenberg made a motion to approve the resolution adopting amended and restated objective design review standards subject to the revisions that were put forth by President Teague and Board Member Ruiz, Board Member Curtis seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1, Board Member Hom voted against. 8. MINUTES 8-A 2021-669 Draft Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2021 Board Member Ruiz made a motion to approve the minutes and Board Member Hom seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS 9-A 2021-667 Planning, Building and Transportation Department Recent Actions and Decisions Staff report and actions can be found at https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4795900&GUID=004F8381 - B630-4F25-923D-730209A3E105&FullText=1. Board Member Rothenberg wanted to pull item PLN20-0538, 1215 Peach Street. She also wanted to know if the Nason Street Project had come back as the minutes had said it would be. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 10 of 12 February 22, 2021 | PlanningBoard/2021-02-22.pdf |