pages: PlanningBoard/2019-10-28.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2019-10-28 | 2 | Staff Member Barrera said that the staff level design review and lot line adjustment for the other building did not include any parking requirements. Board Member Teague asked if there were any existing easements or agreements to require this application to provide parking for the other building. Staff Member Barrera said there is no existing requirement. She added that the project is proposing a deed restriction for shared access to the driveway. Board Member Teague asked why we were treating two different parcels as if they were one. Staff Member Barrera said staff approached the project with the understanding the two properties have historically shared parking. Board Member Teague asked if we could add more parking spaces on this property without triggering the need for an additional Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking space. Staff Member Barrera said they could technically add four more parking spaces before requiring an additional ADA space. Board Member Saheba asked if Planning Staff had any concerns about the frontage on Minturn Street not having direct access to the building. Staff Member Barrera said staff felt the access and design fit the location and proposed use well. Board Member Saheba said it seems like there is an opportunity for at least the one unit facing Minturn to have a door facing the street. He asked about the introduction of the stucco in the new building and whether it would be compatible with the rest of the materials which mirror the historic Listo building. Staff Member Barrera said the stucco helps differentiate the new building from the old building, consistent with the Secretary of Interior standards. President Curtis asked what would happen with the reciprocal parking agreement if one of the buildings was sold. Rick Stewart, applicant, said he does not see the building going into a high occupancy type business model in the future. Board Member Teague asked the applicant if he would be willing to do more parking if it did not trigger the second ADA space. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 2 of 5 October 28, 2019 | PlanningBoard/2019-10-28.pdf |