pages: PlanningBoard/2019-07-08.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2019-07-08 | 2 | There were no other nominations. The nominations were approved 7-0. 7-B 2019-7069 Proposed Development Plan and Design Review Amendments and Lot Line Adjustment for the Del Monte Warehouse Building Project at 1501 Buena Vista. Applicant: TL Partners, L.P. Public Hearing to consider proposed amendments to the development plan and lot line adjustment to accommodate on-site parking requirements and design review amendments to revise surface materials and window materials on the addition to the approved addition to the building. A final environmental review document was approved for this project in 2014. No new significant impacts have been identified and no additional CEQA review is required. Board Member Ruiz recused herself from the item because she lives within 500 feet of the project location. Andrew Thomas, Planning, Building and Transportation Department Director, gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3997678&GUID=7BF771EB- C1F3-4CA5-BCAE-13042228091E&FullText= Board Member Saheba asked if there was a density increase being requested. Staff Member Thomas said that there is no change in the number of units on the site. He said there will be more units in the main building, but fewer units in Subarea C. Board Member Saheba asked if the increase in the number of units in the main building would result in a change to the elevations. Mike O'Hara, Tim Lewis Communities, explained that some of the loft units were changed into two levels of flats. He said the facades of the buildings are essentially unchanged. Board Member Teague asked a question about the pattern of score lines in the new plans, comparing the seemingly random pattern in the proposed plan to the symmetrical pattern in the previous plan. Mr. O'Hara said the goal was to have as few score joints as possible. Board Member Teague asked for clarification about the approved unit counts and how the work-live units would factor in. Staff Member Thomas explained that the ten work-live units would apply towards the commercial space, and are not considered residential units that count toward the Master Plan approval. He explained how the affordable housing pad included land outside of the Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 2 of 10 July 8, 2019 | PlanningBoard/2019-07-08.pdf |