pages: PlanningBoard/2019-06-24.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2019-06-24 | 3 | Board Member Teague moved approval of the staff recommendation. Board Member Curtis seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0. 7-A 2019-7011 Alameda Marina Master Plan Amendments and Tentative Map - 1829 Clement Avenue. Applicant: Alameda Marina, LLC. The Planning Board will hold a public hearing to consider Alameda Marina Master Plan Amendments and the Alameda Marina Tentative Subdivision Map for the Alameda Marina property generally located between Clement Avenue and the Oakland Estuary and between Alameda Marina Drive and Willow Street. The Planning Board will also hold a study session to review the initial design for the first residential structure in Phase 1 of the project. The environmental effects of the proposed project were considered and disclosed in the Alameda Marina Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2016102064). No further environmental review is required under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed improvements. Andrew Thomas, Director of the Planning, Building, and Transportation Department, gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3983631&GUID=10F56481. IC9F-42AB-BD22-72BFD2ED5402&FullText=1. President Sullivan asked how trucks would retrieve a motor boat from the dry storage. Staff Member Thomas showed on the site plan where in the parking lot trucks could pull up to retrieve their boat trailer. Board Member Saheba asked if the view corridor and pedestrian easement would take people through the parking lot and boat storage area. He said it is not clear on the site plan how pedestrians in the view corridor would access the waterfront. Staff Member Thomas said the pedestrians would have to move east on a sidewalk when they reach the parking lot before continuing north to the Bay Trail. Board Member Saheba said there needs to be clear demarcation of how pedestrians would move through the site to the water. He asked if a similar situation was awaiting us at Chestnut Street. Staff Member Thomas said they are not as far along with the plans for that phase of the project and are not proposing any changes in that area at this time. Board Member Rothenberg suggested being more prescriptive in how the open space gets programmed. She asked who had the burden to pay for the upgrades of utility services to the site. She continued by saying that the fire code requirements should be more explicit in the plan. Approved Planning Board minutes Page 3 of 9 June 24, 2019 | PlanningBoard/2019-06-24.pdf |