pages: PlanningBoard/2019-05-28.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2019-05-28 | 7 | President Sullivan said she feels the project should come back. She added that approving the project piecemeal will not result in a good project. Board Member Teague said he does not believe the window plan for the rooms can be excluded from the approval and allow the project to move forward, saying he therefore would not amend his motion. He said he would accept the addition of the first floor clerestory windows. The motion passed 4-3 (Sullivan, Saheba, and Rothenberg voted No.) Staff Member Thomas summarized the decision saying the structural design of the building is approved, but the colors and materials would come back. He added that the parking, setback, and massing are settled issues. Board Member Teague made a motion to have the landscaping plant materials and a cross section of the berm come back for review. Board Member Curtis seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0. Board Member Curtis asked when the item would be coming back to the Board. Staff Member Thomas said that they would bring the item back for the first meeting in July. Board Member Saheba asked that planning staff review the submissions internally for consistency before distributing them. Board Member Rothenberg asked for a partial set of plans that shows the floor plans and sections. President Sullivan declared a five minute recess. 7-B 2019-6940 Review and Comment on the Draft Climate Action and Resiliency Plan Erin Smith, Deputy Public Works Director, gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3953031&GUID=91EEC739- SEBO-4C5D-AE7D-8C52FA9B2740&FullText=1 President Sullivan asked what the cost would be for a typical 2,000 square foot home to convert from gas water heater and furnace to all electric and what the impact would be on the monthly electric bill. Staff Member Smith said they have an estimate of approximately $20,000 to perform the average retrofit. She said they have not identified the specific impact on the monthly electric bill. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 7 of 11 May 28, 2019 | PlanningBoard/2019-05-28.pdf |