pages: PlanningBoard/2019-02-11.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2019-02-11 | 2 | Board Member Cavanaugh asked if the original ferry terminal site was owned by someone else. Staff Member Thomas explained that there are two parcels. One parcel along the waterfront, which would be dedicated to the City. He said Mina Patel purchased the other parcel closer to the road. President Sullivan asked how many uncommitted lots are left in the business park. Mr. Reidy said they are all owned by someone. He described potential plans for different undeveloped parcels. He said infrastructure requirements and funding would continue beyond the end of the development agreement. He said new development fees would now apply to future applications for parcels not already in the pipeline. Staff Member Thomas explained that assessment districts that fund park maintenance will be ongoing. President Sullivan asked whether HBIA homeowners could get sucked into any problems with BCDC because of how the agreements are structured. Staff Member Thomas said the settlement agreement that runs with the land and are not tied to individuals. Board Member Teague asked if they could add a condition to the resolution that it becomes effective upon the transfer of the remaining parcel be recorded. Staff Member Thomas said that they could add that condition. Board Member Teague made a motion to approve the staff recommendation with the condition that the resolution become effective upon successful transfer of Parcel 4 (map 6024) to the City of Alameda. Board Member Mitchell seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0. 7-B 2019-6536 Planning Board Recommendation that the City Council Accept the City of Alameda 2018 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report and Adopt Recommended General Plan Text Amendments to resolve conflicting language between the residential density standards in the 1991 Land Use Element with the residential density standards adopted in the 2012 Housing Element to bring the General Plan into conformance with state housing law. The amendment also includes clarifications regarding business park development standards. The review of the annual report and Land Use Elements are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 2 of 7 February 11, 2019 | PlanningBoard/2019-02-11.pdf |