pages: PlanningBoard/2017-10-09.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2017-10-09 | 4 | The applicant thanked the Board for their input and said he believed the M-X zoning was a good fit. Board Member Teague said they should look at making 50% of their parking carshare to see if they can make the site a hub for carsharing in the area. Board Member Köster said the Parkmerced apartments in San Francisco partnered with UberPool and provide the tenants with a free $100 rideshare voucher monthly. He said that could be a good partnership given the likelihood that the many of the artist residents of a project like this might drive for Uber on the side. No action was taken. 7-B 2017-4799 PLN17-0465 - Building 8 Rooftop Addition - Applicant: Alameda Point Redevelopers, LLC. The proposed addition requires Historical Advisory Board approval of an amendment to a previously approved Certificate of Approval to modify a contributing structure to the Naval Air Station Alameda Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The proposed addition also requires Planning Board approval of an amendment to a previously Development Plan and Design Review. The City of Alameda certified the Alameda Point Final EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 201312043), which evaluated the environmental impacts of redevelopment and reuse of the lands at Alameda Point. No further environmental review is required for this project Staff Member Thomas introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3165569&GUID=8F1C4849- EB4-4632-A78C-F4AFF41FA327&FullText=1 Board Member Köster asked if there was a beer facility in the room 101 facility. The applicant said they are putting a brewery in there. He said the brewery would have a rooftop beer garden. Board Member Köster asked if the rooftop beer garden could be expanded. The applicant said they are in negotiation over that topic now. Board Member Köster asked if the public would be able to walk through the interior commercial spaces from one to the next. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 4 of 7 October 9, 2017 | PlanningBoard/2017-10-09.pdf |