pages: PlanningBoard/2017-05-22.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2017-05-22 | 3 | Vicki Sedlack said we are so close to seeing things happen at Alameda Point and need to support this plan amendment and build all the housing we can for the community and to attract teachers. Bill Smith said he supports the project because it provides much needed affordable housing. Karen Bey said she supports the amendment. She said the developer has been very transparent and we should do what is needed to get the project built. Laura Thomas, Renewed Hope, said they support the amended plan. She said Site A is essential to the city's reputation as a successful and sustainable city. Brad Shook, Bladium co-owner, said they are in full support of the project. He said they are in dire need of infrastructure at the point. Angela Hockabout said she supports the proposed amendment. She said we need to increase our density in Alameda to provide housing for all residents. President Köster closed the public hearing. Board Member Zuppan said she met with the applicant. She said the changes do not increase the amount of housing, and the changing location of some of the housing helps in some ways. She said the project provides many benefits and she is in support of the amendment. Board Member Knox White said not moving forward with this plan now would be against many things that the city says they want. He said he supports the plan. Board Member Curtis said it is a great project but he is concerned that it presents more risks to the city and taxpayers. He suggested requiring the developer put up a bond to ensure phase III gets completed. Board Member Mitchell said he prefers this revised plan over the previous version and fully supports the plan. President Köster said he has spoken with the developer about the plan and fully supports the proposal. Staff Member Thomas said they are focused on making sure phase I is successful. He said the risk to the taxpayers is relatively low and the city would keep possession of the phase III property if nothing moves forward at that time. Approved Minutes Page 3 of 9 May 22, 2017 Planning Board Meeting | PlanningBoard/2017-05-22.pdf |