pages: PlanningBoard/2016-10-24.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2016-10-24 | 3 | Mr. Winstead explained the mix of regular and oversized picnic tables. Board Member Mitchell said he would also like to see the final details come back. He said he liked the design and landform elements. Staff Member Thomas said they would add a condition to bring back the final landscaping plan. He said they would bring back the bike access plans and amend the resolution to specifically allow leashed dogs in the park. He said they would also bring back details of the lighting plan, and water fountain type and placement. Board Member Zuppan made a motion to approve the design review with the conditions listed by Staff Member Thomas. Board Member Knox White seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. The resolution can be found at: https://alamedaca.gov/sites/default/files/document-files/department- files/Planning/2016 planning board resos july-december.pdf 7-A 2016-3500 Hold a Public Hearing to Consider a Development Plan, Design Review and Use Permit (PLN16-0468) for Building 8 on Alameda Point located at 2350 Saratoga Street Staff Member Thomas introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2858657&GUID=682D8768- CCEO-497C-BA5D-457869E36EE2&Options=&Search=&FullText=1 Eric Mikiten, project architect, gave a presentation on the proposed project. Board Member Sullivan asked what kinds of residents they expect moving in. The owner said that people working from home is becoming more common. He said designers, artists, consultants, and other users compatible with residential use could live there. He said the ground floor would likely have a variety of tenants. Board Member Curtis asked if there were requirements for space allocation between the work and live spaces. Mr. Mikiten said Alameda does have code requirements for how much space is used for work. Board Member Sullivan asked what the price points would be and whether the universal design would add to the cost. Approved Minutes Page 3 of 9 Planning Board Meeting October 24, 2016 | PlanningBoard/2016-10-24.pdf |