pages: PlanningBoard/2015-10-26.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2015-10-26 | 3 | located within an R-4 (Neighborhood Residential) zoning district. This project is categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301 (e) - Existing Facilities - additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 square feet. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A CONTINUANCE UNTIL THE NOVEMBER 23, 2015 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. 7-C 2015-2205 PLN15-0198 - 1926 Park Street - Applicant: Bridgett Shank on behalf of Park Esquire, LLC. The applicant requests approval of Design Review and a Use Permit to construct an approximately 4,200-square-foot, five- building mixed use complex using repurposed shipping containers. Four (4) buildings will be single tenant office buildings, and one (1) building will be retail/café on the ground floor and a residential unit on the second floor and third floor. A Use Permit is required for ground floor office space and outdoor seating in the NP-G (North Park Street, Gateway) zoning district. This project is categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332 - Infill Development Projects. David Sablan, Planner I, introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2485518&GUID=92FOBD6B- 4DB6-458A-A449-DAF459B3A552&FullText=1 Board Member Burton asked about the stormwater runoff considerations. Staff Member Sablan said that Public Works looked at the plan and found it to be compliant. Staff Member Tai said that the small size of the lot does not require specific percentage requirements for pervious surface and that the landscaping in the plans would be an improvement over the current 100% impervious surface. Board Member Mitchell asked about existing street lighting that may affect the design. Staff Member Sablan said that the plan was reviewed to make sure there was enough clearance. Page 3 of 8 Approved Minutes October 12, 2015 Planning Board Meeting | PlanningBoard/2015-10-26.pdf |