pages: PlanningBoard/2015-06-22.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2015-06-22 | 5 | addition. He feels the architecture is complementary without trying to mimic the style and City Ventures has engaged the community and incorporated as much as it can. Joseph Woodard, neighbor, stated that his home is not far from the development and he welcomes more neighbors. He is glad to work with staff, the Planning Board, and the applicant who have listened to the neighbors. Ginni Dofflemyer, neighbor, stated that the project has made huge progress, but it is not complete yet. She feels that they still need to keep working on the plan, save the trees, and make the project harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. Penny Cozad, neighbor, feels that the bulk and effect of the project on the neighborhood with the setbacks so close it makes the street feel narrow Michael McDonough, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of the project stating it will increase jobs for the area stating that the Chamber of Commerce recommends approval. Dick Rutter, AAPS, cited a development in Cape Cod is half as dense has 2100 Clement Avenue with 63 units on 8 acres built using East Coast architecture with four paths of travel to the beach. He feels that Clement Avenue can do something similar utilizing gabled areas for bedrooms. Stephanie Butler, neighbor, stated she still has concerns with the open space and the guest parking in the middle of it. She agrees that maintaining guest parking is important and would like to see a minimum of 6 and prefers more. Tess Meier stated she is not from neighborhood and is moving to Oakland but feels the city needs more housing. She feels that City Ventures has accommodated the neighbors on architecture, and electric cars. Helen Sause, Alameda Home Team, feels the project is compatible and City Ventures has been receptive to the neighbor comments. She feels the project is a complementary addition to the area and it provides diverse and transit oriented housing. She recommends approval. Christopher Buckley, AAPS, thanked City Ventures for working close with AAPS stating that they have made significant changes but there are still some changes to be made. Steve Aced, resident, stated that he supports the work from City Ventures, but feels there is still work to be done for the project to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Matt Cotter, neighbor, stated he is happy to see the project progress and is glad to see that connection is a concern. He agrees that the open space should be bigger, but does not feel the need for 15 guest parking spaces. The project is better than what is there. Approved Minutes June 22, 2016 Planning Board Meeting Page 5 of 7 | PlanningBoard/2015-06-22.pdf |