pages: PlanningBoard/2015-03-23.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2015-03-23 | 2 | multiple floors. Mr. Ernst explained that the buildings on the site would be used for event space, public meeting space, dining and retail, and the buildings would be no more than 35 feet high. Board Member Köster asked Mr. Thomas if there would be a bus terminal at the site to complement the proposed ferry service. Mr. Thomas said that the ferry terminal would be built at the end of Pacific Avenue, and that staff has been working with AC Transit to determine the routes. Board Member Köster asked about the definition of a "naked street". Mr. Israel defined the term. Board Member Zuppan asked about the inclusion of universal design in the draft resolution. Mr. Thomas explained that the universal design plan was still under discussion. Board Member Zuppan asked about the definition of solar-ready homes. Mr. Israel explained that the concept of having solar-ready homes is a state requirement. The Board opened public comment: Mr. Jim Strehlow asked about the status of the non-profit museums that are currently at the space. Mr. Thomas said that the Naval Air Museum would not be affected by these designs. Ms. Jennifer Ott, Chief Operating Officer for Alameda Point, explained that staff would work with all tenants affected by these plans. The Board closed public comment: Board Member Knox White said that he appreciated the plans. He said that the plan's cover image shows the park in the middle of the road, but it is not in the updated plan. He wanted staff to change the image to prevent confusion among members of the public. He also expressed concern about the 12 diagonal parking spaces proposed for the naked street area. He wanted to see successful examples of shared space with similar parking. He believes that the use of the central space at Site A would decide whether or not the entire project would be successful. Board Member Burton said he believes it is important to get the diagram of the site plan correct. The townhouse blocs seem to have gaps between each other, and he wondered if there could be a way to offset these gaps between the houses. He commended the design team for trying to create a vibrant and pedestrian street front, with the fronts of the buildings having either retail or residential units. He said he also appreciated the imagery chosen in order to highlight the vibrant environment planned for the site. Board Member Burton asked about the scheduling to remove fencing around Seaplane Lagoon, and said he wants the site to be used as often as possible. He reminded the team to provide spaces Approved Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7 March 23, 2015 | PlanningBoard/2015-03-23.pdf |