pages: PlanningBoard/2012-11-13.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2012-11-13 | 4 | violations of these conditions within a 12- month period, the City shall automatically set a date for a revocation hearing before the Planning Board" be changed to a 13 month period. Board member Köster feels that the 12-month period will be easier to track and remember. Board member Knox White agrees that since the Use Permit can be called for review at any time the 12-month period is fine. Motion to approve the Use Permit as amended by Board member Köster. Seconded by Board member Knox White. Approved 5-0, no abstentions 7-C Public Hearing on Draft North Park Street Area Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Design Review Manual, and Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) - The Planning Board will consider approval of draft amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and a draft Design Manual to regulate future development within the area bounded by the Oakland Alameda Estuary, Tilden/Lincoln, and Oak Street (approximately 20 blocks of commercial, residential and industrial land uses). Board member Köster recused himself from the discussion as he lives in the district. Mr. Thomas stated that the comment period on the Zoning Amendments has been extended to November 26, 2012 and final action will be taken by the Planning Board at the January 15, 2013 (Tuesday) meeting. He gave a brief presentation pointing out the major changes and the five sub districts. President Zuppan opened the public comment period. Patsy Paul, resident, spoke in support of the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPSO recommendations that the area not be zoned mixed use but remain residential. Karen Bey, resident, stated that she is excited about the project and believes the rezoning will bring more tourists to Alameda. She also stated that she would like to see a visitor's center located on Park Street to help attract people to town and would like to see the City return to its roots as a resort destination. Robb Ratto, PSBA, questioned why drive-thru's need to be eliminated from the area stating that they should be reviewed on a case by case basis with approval being granted through a use permit. He also stated that see through windows are not always feasible for the business owner. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 November 13, 2012 | PlanningBoard/2012-11-13.pdf |