pages: PlanningBoard/2012-08-27.pdf, 12
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2012-08-27 | 12 | Board member Knox White stated that most houses on the block are two stories but the distance between the buildings are much wider. He stated that he is considering approving the appeal and denying the addition. He concurred that the lighting will be impacted. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she spoke with Board member Burton and determined that the design review could be improved. She suggested that the Board consider going back and redesigning the addition. Mr. Suji, stated that he is going by the recommendation of planning and that although it is difficult to consider a redesign, it is something he would consider. Board member Knox White confirmed that if the appeal is upheld then the project is denied and the applicant must start over. Board member Knox White motioned to extend the meeting until 12:15 Board member Henneberry seconded the motion Motion carried, 5-0; no abstentions. Board member Knox White clarified with the applicant that the applicant is not interested in applying for new permits when his neighbors are probably going to oppose the redesign. He stated that he may be interested in approving something that is consistent with the code, but not necessarily this particular design, stating that if the applicant is following the rules it is very difficult for the Board to not approve the permit. President Zuppan stated that based on the staff report it is clear that the neighbors are not interested in a redesign since they oppose the addition of a second story. Vice President Burton clarified with staff that a variance is not being asked for. He stated that there are no rules against a second story addition, and that there won't make much difference with the amount of light and air if the leaves height is maintained and the addition is set back two feet. He stated that since the applicant has designed according to the code and he has a hard time upholding the appeal. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that the one applicant is concerned with privacy, while the other neighbor is concerned with lighting. Board member Henneberry stated that he will support staff's recommendation. President Zuppan stated that she is not inclined to uphold the appeal. Board member Knox White stated that if Board chooses to deny the appeal then the municipal code needs to be changed due to adverse effects of blocked lighting and views. He stated that there are very specific finding that he cannot make and to. He stated that he will be vote to uphold the appeal. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 13 July 23, 2012 | PlanningBoard/2012-08-27.pdf |