pages: PlanningBoard/2012-05-14.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2012-05-14 | 8 | maintained. She also asked how continuity of the street grid will be maintained with private streets. Mr. Thomas replied that the retail shopping center site plan and parking plan show where both the private and public roads go. President Zuppan asked who sets the standards for maintenance of the private roads. Mr. Thomas replied that the City sets the standards; and it is a public-private partnership. President Zuppan clarified that the private roads will not be subject to private ownership standards. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that the project will be a great improvement from the current pile of rock, weeds, and broken concrete that currently exists. Board member Burton stated that the project is clearly broken into four parcels, yet there is a fifth parcel that is approximately 4.8 acres. He asked who owns the "remainder" parcel, what it is for, and what its plans are. Mr. Thomas replied that the remainder parcel is primarily the public rights of way. Bill Kennedy, Vice President of construction for Catellus, stated that Public Works has requested that the existing easements and any future easements, be identified on the map. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft asks if the parcel mentioned in the resolution, which is being divided in to four smaller parcels, is inclusive of the remainder parcel that is currently being discussed. Mr. Kennedy answered that the parcel does not include that remainder Board member Ezzy Ashcraft asked that since the 9.3 acres of land for the public right of way is not the remainder parcel currently under discussion, then where is it. Mr. Thomas stated that the 9 acres are for the streets. Mr. Kennedy stated that usually project maps start with the large piece, create the parcels, and dedicate the rights of way. Board member Burton stated that it now makes sense why the remainder is included on the map and asked if the City owns it. Mr. Thomas stated that the land was conveyed from the Navy to the City in 1999, the City still owns it, but has committed it to Catellus as part of the Catellus project in 2000. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft asked if any mention of the remainder needs to be included in the resolution. Mr. Thomas replied that it does not need to be stated in the resolution. Board member Köster asked if in the future the entire Master Plan of the area could be included. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 12 May 14, 2012 | PlanningBoard/2012-05-14.pdf |