pages: PlanningBoard/2009-07-13.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2009-07-13 | 4 | President Kohlstrand closed the public comment period. Board member Cook moved, Vice-President Ezzy Ashcraft seconded continuation of 1913 Sherman to the next Planning Board meeting. Motion passed 6-0-0. PLN09-0112 - 1590 and 1616 Fortmann Way (APN 072-0231-018-00) / PLN09-0116 - 2015 and 2025 Grand Street (APN 072-0381-002-00 and 072-0381-001-00) A rezoning of three parcels from M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District, to R-4-PD, Neighborhood Residential Planned Development District. PLN09-0113 - 2201 Clement Avenue (APN 071-0289-004-00) / PLN09- 0114 - 2189 Clement Avenue (APN 071-0289-007-03) A rezoning of two separate parcels totaling approximately five acres from M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District, to R-2-PD, Two Family Planned Development Residence District. PLN09-0115 - 2100 Clement Avenue and 1924 Willow Street (APN 071- 0228-001-02) A rezoning of a 2.7 acre parcel from M-1, Intermediate Industrial (Manufacturing) District, to R-2-PD, Two Family Planned Development Residence District. Board member Cook moved, Vice-President Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the recommendation to City Council for the approval of rezoning 1590 and 1616 Fortman Way, 2201 and 2189 Clement Avenue, and 2100 Clement and 1924 Willow Street. Motion passed 6-0-0. 9-A. 2009-2010 Election of Planning Board Officers. The Planning Board will elect a new President and Vice President for the upcoming year, as required by the Planning Board By-Laws. President Kohlstrand continued this item until a new Planning Board member is appointed by the City Council. No motion was passed on this item. 9-B Appeal of Major Design Review Approval - DR07-0046 - 1611 Walnut Street - Cheryl Clemans Appellant. Design review approval for a two-story addition and remodel to an existing two-story duplex is being appealed to the Planning Board for consideration. Staff presented the project. Board member Cook asked for clarification on the location of the proposed decks on the rear of the property. C. Clemans, appellant, stated her reasons for appealing the design review: a) the distances between the two homes is five feet and the addition is located in the side yard setback, b) the new addition would shade her property and reduce her privacy, c) her Page 4 of 7 | PlanningBoard/2009-07-13.pdf |