pages: PlanningBoard/2009-03-09.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2009-03-09 | 3 | Board member McNamara stated she thought it was a thorough document, addresses issues, and is a good tool to assist the Board moving forward. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft stated that with the current economic situation the document takes on urgency and addresses the possible need for additional housing for all income levels. Board member Autorino stated that it is a good plan to increase all levels of housing needs in a city with limited space. President Kohlstrand stated she thought the document was comprehensive and suggested including an executive summary or paragraph describing the background of the Housing Element, or staff analysis. She would like it to include a summary of where the City is, what the City can accomplish and how the City plans to meet these objectives. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft referred to page III-16. She would like to understand what items staff considers priority items. President Kohlstrand stated the report should stress that Alameda is an island and has limited opportunities for housing development. Staff stated an introduction and or summary at the beginning of the Housing Element would be included and additional public hearings will take place. A Board discussion ensued on public input to the Housing Element. Staff suggested sending the document to HCD for review, and during the 60-day review period staff can discuss with the Board opportunities for community input. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft referred to page II-1 Housing Policies and stated this section appears to be directed towards the Northern Waterfront. The Housing Element discusses allowing housing in areas zoned for industry and commercial use. She would like staff to address what issues surface when locating housing next to commercial uses to ensure compatibility. Staff stated that conformance rezoning is an existing project in the department and staff plans to start with areas designated for housing in the Housing Element. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft referred to policy II-6 3d and asked staff to elaborate on the Island High site's availability for non school district employees. She asked if there were a specific number of units set aside for school district employees. Staff responded that the use of redevelopment funds precludes the City from restricting which applicants can apply for housing on this site. There is no specific number of units set aside for school district employees but they are being given priority. President Kohlstrand referred to policy II-2 (b.i) and asked if the home ownership goal was a result of a 2001 policy adopted by City Council. She asked if the policy should be revisited. Page 3 of 11 | PlanningBoard/2009-03-09.pdf |