pages: PlanningBoard/2008-10-27.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-10-27 | 4 | definition about when certain improvements will be constructed and who will pay for them. The Transportation Plan needs to be "front loaded" with "Day One" improvements to the maximum extent feasible. The BRT proposal could become very controversial given what has occurred recently in Berkeley and Oakland with AC Transit's BRT proposal. Regarding the phasing of the Ferry Terminal relocation, increasing the frequency of ferry service from the Main Street Terminal earlier in the phases may be more important than relocating the terminal to the Seaplane Lagoon in the earlier phases. A copy of the presentation should be made available on the City Website. 4. MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of July 14, 2008 (continued from October 13, 2008). Board member Ezzy moved and Board member Autorino seconded the motion to approve the minutes of July 14, 2008 as amended. The amendments include p. 11 "Eugenie Thompson asked that the Board not certify the EIR". Page 7 should state "conditions" not "mitigation measures". The motion passed with the following voice vote - 4, Noes: 0, Absent 2, Abstain: 1 Minutes from the meeting of August 11, 2008 (pending) Minutes from the meeting of August 25, 2008 Continued to the meeting of November 10, 2008 Minutes from the meeting of September 8, 2008 (continued from October 13, 2008) President Kohlstrand requested a change to the last statement on the last page - add "focus on how to address issues of sea level rise and geotechnical issues". Continued to the meeting of November 10, 2008 Minutes from the meeting of September 22, 2008 (pending) Minutes from the meeting of October 13, 2008 Board member Cook moved and Board member McNamara seconded the motion to approve the minutes of October 13, 2008 as amended. Board member Cook requested the following changes on page 3 second to last paragraph "she also specifically would like the applicant to provide". Page 6: "staff would provide more info regarding the approval process for the overall project". The motion passed with the following voice vote - 4, Noes: 0, Absent 2, Abstain: 1. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff presented the future agendas. 10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. Page 4 of 5 | PlanningBoard/2008-10-27.pdf |