pages: PlanningBoard/2008-09-08.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-09-08 | 6 | The developer presented the design concept for this site. There were three main objectives affecting the design: create a successful marina, create pedestrian friendly open space, and the financial consideration where the residential component pays for open space improvements and ongoing maintenance. There are 19 acres of residential and open space. The road is being redesigned to provide access to the marina and the residential development. A parking lot is included for marina users as well as public access parking for open space users. The residential area is designed with cul-de-sacs and each property has views of the bay. The total open space area is 10 acres and the bay trail will be incorporated into the open space design. The design includes 4 acres for streets and parking, and five acres for 61 residential units. These units will be single- family dwellings and includes a few duplexes. The public hearing was opened. No speaker slips were received. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. Board member Cunningham stated that he liked the project design. He would like the cul-de-sacs to be designed uniquely so they do not all look exactly alike. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft inquired about the vision for commercial uses. Staff responded that commercial uses would be office space and driven by the real estate market. Tidelands regulations restricts the area to marine uses only. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether predicted rising sea levels were taken into account with the design. The developer responded yes. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft moved and Board member Cook seconded the motion to extend the meeting to 11:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. A Board discussion ensued on safety and public access to the open areas. The developer stated that residential areas are considered 24 hour use areas. Restaurants that are open late provide a sense of safety but residents may be opposed to the increased traffic. Board member Cook inquired whether all the cul-de-sacs have roads that go all the way through, and how will it be clear to the public that the road is publicly accessible. Page 6 of 7 | PlanningBoard/2008-09-08.pdf |