pages: PlanningBoard/2008-08-11.pdf, 20
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-08-11 | 20 | early and closing late, and the Christmas closing hours of midnight. President Kohlstrand stated she thinks they would have to alter overall operating hours to change that. Board member McNamara stated that perhaps these extended holiday hours are becoming the norm. She does not see a problem with that and believes store hours should be driven by a business decision. President Kohlstrand stated she believes there is a general consensus to stay with the hours of operation and the time limitations that the staff has put forward, along with the 200 feet limitation adjacent to residential uses, and also with respect to outdoor activities. Board member Cunningham moved to approve items 8, 9, and 10. The motion passed unanimously. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft requested that the next time this item comes before the Board it is placed at the beginning of the agenda. President Kohlstrand stated that the Board had already approved item 11. She asked when the item would be before the Board again. She asked if it could be presented on September 22, 2008. She asked if at that time the public hearing would be open or closed. The Assistant City Attorney stated the public comment period does not have to be reopened. President Kohlstrand stated there is always an open public comment period at all Planning Board meetings, and the public can comment on items not specifically listed on the agenda. Board member Lynch believed the public comment period should be reopened, the project should be renoticed, and it should be stated that specific items are open for comment and discussion by the Board. Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft agreed with Board member Lynch. President Kohlstrand stated there was consensus among the Board to keep the public comment period open. Staff asked to clarify the Board discussion regarding the sign program. There was a condition in the resolution related to the signage, there weren't any findings in the resolution, and there was a reference to an attachment four by one of the planning board members and that attachment was the Master Sign Program that was being proposed (page 6 of 14). Page 20 of 21 | PlanningBoard/2008-08-11.pdf |