pages: PlanningBoard/2008-07-14.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-07-14 | 9 | Randy Kyte, Harsch Investment, replied that Paoli did the base building redesign and OSH's own architect did the inner workings of the facility. Regarding the nursery area, this is the first time an open-air concept has been used at Alameda Towne Centre (ATC). The design was a collaboration between the two architectural firms to keep the area open, light, and secure. Board member Kohlstrand stated she thought the overall increase in square footage was 1,500 sf, but it excludes the garden center. She asked if it was being picked up by extending the west wall. Mr. Kyte responded yes. When the loading dock is relocated an area will be reconfigured, the building pushed back slightly, and the former large deep loading dock will be infilled. Board member Kohlstrand asked if there was an extension towards the Willows, to which Mr. Kyte responded no. President Cook asked if the square footage included the 35,000 sf building currently located there plus 1,500 sf and staff responded that the building is 37,200 sf and the additional square footage is 1,575. Board member Kohlstrand stated that she liked the design of the building. She expressed concerns about the additional square footage of the garden center and the sidewalk along the north/south driveway, which disappeared with the new design. She also expressed concern about the lack of landscaping on the west elevation given that it is closer to residential uses. She would like landscaping in this area similar to what is being done inside the Centre. The Board members asked questions about the landscaping for the project and staff responded. Board member Autorino believed it was a good use of the property and it would be good to have OSH in Alameda. He does not believe OSH would have a significant impact on local businesses. He agreed that some additional landscaping would be nice, but that he liked the proposal as it was presented. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she generally liked the proposal. Her concern is the delivery truck route, and the impact on other businesses. Staff responded that deliveries are addressed in the next agenda item. Board member McNamara approved of the design and believed it was consistent with the other buildings in the Centre. Board member Lynch agreed that the design was harmonious. He acknowledged that moving the loading dock inside was a great idea. He stated that the area is zoned for this type of use, and the Alameda Economic Development Commission approved of this type of business. President Cook stated that she was comfortable with the design along with the landscaping improvements. She believed the outdoor area was additional GLA. She expressed concerns Page 9 of 13 | PlanningBoard/2008-07-14.pdf |