pages: PlanningBoard/2008-06-23.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-06-23 | 3 | noted that PSBA supported the demolition of the current building. He was happy to hear that a parking exception was not needed. He noted that the new building would be better-looking and better-functioning. Mr. Christopher Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Avenue, agreed that the new design would be a big improvement over the current building. He was surprised that the signage would not be considered at this meeting, and he believed it was an integral part of the overall design. He noted that the existing pole sign was 12 feet tall, which he believed was too tall. He believed a monument sign should be placed on a base, not a pole. He suggested that the sign be six feet tall, rather than 12 feet tall. He noted that the drive-through signs were also pole-type signs, and suggested that they be converted to a monument sign with a solid base. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that she liked the new design, which was much more harmonious with the neighborhood. She was concerned with the drive-through effect on the environment and air quality. She noted that a car idling for two minutes uses the same amount of fuel as it took to drive one mile, and that idling cars cause a negative impact on health. She noted that an alternative to idling is to park the car, order, and return to the car. She understood that the restaurant was set up more as a take-out restaurant. She believed that the City should be a good steward of the environment. She would like to see a slight redesign to provide on-site parking instead of the drive-through. Vice President Kohlstrand shared Board member Ezzy Ashcraft's concerns with respect to the drive-through and trash cleanup. She endorsed a daily cleanup. She agreed the building design had improved, and she was concerned that the restaurant rested up against the sidewalk. She inquired about the limitations on drive-through restaurants in any zoning area in the City. Mr. Brighton noted that drive-through restaurants were prohibited in some areas on Webster Street, but not on Park Street. Mr. Thomas believed the current drive-through was done with permits, although staff had not located those records. Board member Cunningham would like to hear from the applicant regarding the drive-through element. He inquired about employee break areas. Mr. Thomas noted that they were not discussed in reviewing the application. Board member Cunningham inquired whether the Police Department had reviewed the security of this project. Mr. Thomas confirmed that they had, and that they were satisfied. Board member Cunningham inquired if wood windows had been considered to blend with the historical elements. Board member Autorino shared the concerns regarding the trash pickup, and believed that daily pickups were significantly better. He believed the design was significantly improved over the Page 3 of 23 | PlanningBoard/2008-06-23.pdf |