pages: PlanningBoard/2008-04-28.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-04-28 | 3 | Vice President Kohlstrand noted that she had a similar request for the following meeting for the Draft Pedestrian Plan. She noted that City staff's Gail Payne had done a lot of work on that document, and that it may take two meetings to cover it. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft suggested that for future agenda scheduling, whenever an item had a voluminous amount of reading, that staff could determine when the documents would be ready, and give the Planning Board members a longer window of time to review the documents before the meeting. President Cook noted that the office condominium project at Harbor Bay went to City Council on appeal, and the appeal was rejected, so project approval was upheld. She noted that she had spoken to an appellant, who expressed concern about the lack of sufficient notice. She had told President Cook that over 1,300 had signed a petition. President Cook believed that there should be more time to inform the public, as well as time to review the materials. Vice President Kohlstrand noted that the 300-foot radius noticing had been complied with, and added that there were a number of homeowners associations within Harbor Bay Isle, as well as a Master Association. She suggested that the Association put themselves on the list to receive the packet online. Board member Lynch noted that about two years ago, the Board held a discussion regarding revising how it interacted with the public in terms of noticing. They believed that given the staff needs, that a break in the schedule be taken, and a Planning Board agenda projecting forward a month was suggested. He believed it would be simple to do, and would not take any additional dollars or staff resources; he noted that management scheduling would be able to accomplish that goal. b. Zoning Administrator Report - Meeting of April 15, 2008. Mr. Biggs provided an update on the latest Zoning Administrator Report, and noted that the Action Agenda was also included in the packet. 7. ORAL COMMUNICATION: None. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: None. 9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 9-B. Capital Improvement Projects Fiscal Year 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 The Planning Board will review the proposed Capital Improvement Projects Proposal for the next two year City Budget. The Planning Board will consider whether the proposed expenditure plan is consistent with the City of Alameda General Plan. Page 3 of 17 | PlanningBoard/2008-04-28.pdf |