pages: PlanningBoard/2008-01-14.pdf, 1
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2008-01-14 | 1 | Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting Monday, January 14, 2008 1. CONVENE: 7:03 p.m. 2. FLAG SALUTE: Board Member Ezzy Ashcraft. 3. ROLL CALL: President Cook, Vice President Kohlstrand, Board Members Ezzy Ashcraft, Lynch and McNamara. Board Member Cunningham was absent from roll call. Also present were Planning Services Manager Andrew Thomas, Assistant City Attorney Farimah Faiz. 4. MINUTES: a. Meeting of November 13, 2007 (Not available) b. Meeting of November 26, 2007. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that on page 3, under the description of 9-A, the spelling of ProLogis was misspelled as ProLogic. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 6, paragraph 2, should be changed to read, "He noted that the goal of the plan was to make finding a parking easier for the shopper.' Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the second to last paragraph on page 6 should be changed to read, "He did not believe the users of the handicapped stalls would be being able to get out easily with the traffic flows." Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 7, paragraph 1, read, "The Master Plan now states that for a particular use, the maximum should be 4.5, but shared parking for multiple uses, the maximum shall be 4.5 per 1000." She did not believe this sentence was explanatory, and requested that some clarification be added. Member McNamara noted that on page 10, the approval date for the minutes were listed as December 10, 2007, and should be January 14, 2008. President Cook noted that the summary paragraph after Mr. Berry spoke read, "Mr. Steve Kendrick displayed the changes and noted that they retained the concept of the continuous island along the east-west drive aisle, but to provide head-in parking, moving the drive aisle back to keep the circulation within the parking pod." She had difficulty picturing what had been approved, and requested that a smaller version of that section be attached so the Board could visualize it before the final approval was made. Page 1 of 12 | PlanningBoard/2008-01-14.pdf |